Cited by 59Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgriculture and Rural Development Research

Indicators used by farmers to design agricultural systems: A survey

Open access
Toffolini, Quentin, Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène, Prost, Lorène·2016·Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Abstract

Agriculture is undergoing profound transformation in response to the global challenges of food security, pollution and climate change. In particular, some farmers are exploring and tentatively applying new practices based on agroecological principles. However, depending on biological regulation, these practices have uncertain results. In order to choose and monitor their changes, farmers use various indicators. In our study, we examined these indicators as they were applied in the implementation of technical changes, with a view to determining their exact nature, partly unexplored by agronomists. We held six interviews, performed a retrospective analysis of a redesign project involving five farmers and four advisors, observed collective visits at long-term field experiments, and organized a design workshop with eight farmers. We then coded the verbatim transcript in order to characterize the functions and attributes of the indicators, using the principles of grounded theory. Our results show that indicators have 22 different functions regarding the farmers’ technical action, grouped into five categories. The most common functions are more learning-oriented than assessment-oriented, e.g., “adaptation-monitoring” with 92 out of the 260 statements on indicators identified, and “understanding-reinterpretation” with 107 out of 260 statements. The attributes of the indicators are predominantly visual (62 %), relative (63 %), and passive (75 %). In addition, we found that indicators used at a strategic decision level are specific, as they are mostly quantified, concern large time and spatial scales, and are essentially dynamic, that is, interpreted in as trends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13593-015-0340-z

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toffolini, Q., Jeuffroy, M.-H., & Prost, L.
Affiliations
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
  • Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations, Sociétés (FR)
Corresponding author
Toffolini, Quentin
Venue
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Published
2015-12-22
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
np
ISSN
  • 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1774-0746
OpenAlex
W2230914004
Cited by
59
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Conseil Régional, Île-de-France
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Keywords
agroecology, farmer decision-making, adaptation monitoring, visual indicators, relative indicators, agricultural advisors, long-term field experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review