Indicators used by farmers to design agricultural systems: A survey
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture is undergoing profound transformation in response to the global challenges of food security, pollution and climate change. In particular, some farmers are exploring and tentatively applying new practices based on agroecological principles. However, depending on biological regulation, these practices have uncertain results. In order to choose and monitor their changes, farmers use various indicators. In our study, we examined these indicators as they were applied in the implementation of technical changes, with a view to determining their exact nature, partly unexplored by agronomists. We held six interviews, performed a retrospective analysis of a redesign project involving five farmers and four advisors, observed collective visits at long-term field experiments, and organized a design workshop with eight farmers. We then coded the verbatim transcript in order to characterize the functions and attributes of the indicators, using the principles of grounded theory. Our results show that indicators have 22 different functions regarding the farmers’ technical action, grouped into five categories. The most common functions are more learning-oriented than assessment-oriented, e.g., “adaptation-monitoring” with 92 out of the 260 statements on indicators identified, and “understanding-reinterpretation” with 107 out of 260 statements. The attributes of the indicators are predominantly visual (62 %), relative (63 %), and passive (75 %). In addition, we found that indicators used at a strategic decision level are specific, as they are mostly quantified, concern large time and spatial scales, and are essentially dynamic, that is, interpreted in as trends.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sustainability performance indicators are often used for assessment purposes, rather than supporting stakeholder learning and actions.
“Moreover, sustainability performance indicators are often used for assessment purposes, rather than supporting stakeholder learning and actions.”
From An Actor-Oriented Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework to Support a Transition towards Sustainable Agricultural Systems Based on Crop Diversification (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,470 · see citing works
Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.-F., Ferrer, A., & Peigné, J. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic
Lardon, S., C, M., Marraccini, E., M, D., M, G., & S, L. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Diagnosis of the Nitrogen Status in Crops
Lemaire, G. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60684-7 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Horlings, L., & Marsden, T. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.004 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Doré, T., Makowski, D., Malézieux, E., Munier-Jolain, N., Tchamitchian, M., & Tittonell, P. (2011) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning
Heink, U., & Kowarik, I. (2010) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.09.009 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Adaptive management of biological systems: A review
Westgate, M. J., Likens, G. E., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.016 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Agri-Environmental Indicators to Assess Cropping and Farming Systems. A Review
Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Makowski, D., Aveline, A., Girardin, P., & Plantureux, S. (2008) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro:2007052 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Indicators: Tools to Evaluate the Environmental Impacts of Farming Systems
Girardin, P., Bockstaller, C., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (1999) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1300/j064v13n04_03 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Murage, E. W., Karanja, N., Smithson, P. C., et al. (2000) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00142-5 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Barrios, E., Delve, R. J., Bekunda, M. A., Mowo, J., Agunda, J., Ramisch, J. J., Trejo, M., & Thomas, R. J. (2006) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.12.007 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level
Marchand, F., Debruyne, L., Triste, L., Gerrard, C. L., Padel, S., & Lauwers, L. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06876-190346 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Agroecology in action: extending alternative agriculture through social networks
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6230 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Chantre, E., & Cardona, A. (2014) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2013.876483 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Integrating scientific and farmers' evaluation of soil quality indicators in Central Kenya
Mairura, F., Mugendi, D. N., Mwanje, J., Ramisch, J. J., Mbugua, P. K., & Chianu, J. N. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.01.019 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The information content of indicators in intercropping research
Connolly, J., Goma, H. C., & Rahim, K. (2001) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00278-x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures
Alaphilippe, A., Simon, S., & Hayer, F. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7927-3 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management
Clark, M. (2002) · Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.531 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Les pratiques des agriculteurs. Point de vue sur un courant nouveau de la recherche agronomique
Landais, E., Deffontaines, J.-P., & Benoît, M. (1988) · Études rurales · doi:10.3406/rural.1988.3226 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Replacing the nitrogen nutrition index by the chlorophyll meter to assess wheat N status
Prost, L., & Jeuffroy, M. (2007) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro:2007032 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationLimaux, F., Recous, S., Meynard, J.-M., et al. (1999) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004629511235 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Complex bioindication and environmental stress assessment
Fränzle, O. (2005) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.015 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Biological Indicator Systems in Floodplains – a Review
Dziock, F., Henle, K., Foeckler, F., et al. (2006) · International Review of Hydrobiology · doi:10.1002/iroh.200510885 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Dalgaard, T., Bieńkowski, J., Bleeker, A., et al. (2012) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-9-5303-2012 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Measuring the accuracy of agro-environmental indicators
Makowski, D., Tichit, M., Guichard, L., Keulen, H. V., & Beaudoin, N. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.023 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Le fait technique en agronomie. Activite agricole, concepts et methodes d'etude
Benoît, M., Deffontaines, J.-P., & Gras, R. (1989) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Duru, M. (2013) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.002 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
A dual indicator set to help farms achieve more sustainable crop protection
Wustenberghs, H., Delcour, I., D’Haene, K., et al. (2012) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3332 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Evidence for weed quantity as the major information gathered by organic farmers for weed management
Casagrande, M., Joly, N., Jeuffroy, M., Bouchard, C., & David, C. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0073-6 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iocola, I., Angevin, F., Bockstaller, C., Catarino, R., Curran, M., Messéan, A., Schader, C., Stilmant, D., Van Stappen, F., Vanhove, P., et al. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12135434 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“, Agri-Environmental Indicators [17]), rather than to support stakeholder learning and drive their actions during the sustainability transition [18].”
Background
- Authors
- Toffolini, Q., Jeuffroy, M.-H., & Prost, L.
- Affiliations
- AgroParisTech (FR)
- Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations, Sociétés (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Toffolini, Quentin
- Venue
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2015-12-22
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- np
- ISSN
- 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
- 1774-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2230914004
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Conseil Régional, Île-de-France
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
- Keywords
- agroecology, farmer decision-making, adaptation monitoring, visual indicators, relative indicators, agricultural advisors, long-term field experiment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review