The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review
Open accessAbstract
With a growing world population, increasingly demanding consumers, and a limited amount of agricultural land, there is an urgent need to find alternatives to conventional meat products. Livestock production is, moreover, a leading cause of anthropogenic-induced climate change. To mediate this, more sustainable diets are needed, with reduced meat consumption or the use of alternative protein sources. Insects are promoted as human food and animal feed worldwide. In tropical countries, edible insects are harvested from nature, but overexploitation, habitat changes, and environmental contamination threaten this food resource. Therefore, sustainable harvesting practices need to be developed and implemented. We provide examples of (1) aquatic insects whose populations are threatened by pollution, (2) caterpillar species in Africa that are disappearing due to overexploitation and habitat change, (3) edible insects species that are considered pests in agro-ecosystems, and (4) edible insect species that can be conserved and enhanced in forest management systems. Insect farming can be conducted either on small-scale farms or in large-scale industrialized rearing facilities. We review the environmental sustainability of insect farming compared to livestock production. The major environmental advantages of insect farming compared to livestock production are as follows: (1) less land and water is required; (2) greenhouse gas emissions are lower; (3) insects have high feed conversion efficiencies; (4) insects can transform low-value organic by-products into high-quality food or feed; and (5) certain insect species can be used as animal feed or aqua feed. For instance, they can replace fish meal, which is becoming increasingly scarce and expensive. However, edible insect species intended for production should be screened for risks to humans, animals, plants, and biodiversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
State of the art on use of insects as animal feed.
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · Cited by 1,846
Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A. N., Gerber, P., Gill, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2925 · Cited by 1,045
Environmental impacts of cultured meat production
Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200130u · Cited by 891
Seaweeds for livestock diets: A review
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., Giger-Reverdin, S., Lessire, M., Lebas, F., & Ankers, P. (2016) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.018 · Cited by 640
A value added manure management system using the black soldier fly
Craig Sheppard, D., Larry Newton, G., Thompson, S. A., & Savage, S. (1994) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/0960-8524(94)90102-3 · Cited by 508
Food and feed products from micro-algae: Market opportunities and challenges for the EU
Vigani, M., Parisi, C., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E., Barbosa, M. J., Sijtsma, L., Ploeg, M., & Enzing, C. (2015) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.004 · Cited by 350
Lalander, C., Diener, S., Magri, M. E., Zurbrügg, C., Lindström, A., & Vinnerås, B. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.033 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review
van Huis, A. (2020) · Journal of Insects as Food and Feed · doi:10.3920/jiff2019.0017 · Cited by 544
Self-citationGold, M., Tomberlin, J. K., Diener, S., Zurbrügg, C., & Mathys, A. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.022 · Cited by 528
The Potential Role of Insects as Feed: A Multi-Perspective Review.
Sogari, G., Amato, M., Biasato, I., Chiesa, S., & Gasco, L. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9040119 · Cited by 395
Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges
Lange, K. W., & Nakamura, Y. (2021) · Journal of Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001 · Cited by 344
Singh, A., & Kumari, K. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109569 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- van Huis, A., & Oonincx, D. G. A. B.
- Venue
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2017-09-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
- 1774-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2754705897
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 43.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
- The paper
- van Huis, A., & Oonincx, D. G. A. B. (2017). The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.