Cited by 3Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTopic ModelingMachine Learning in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing LLM-based clinical reasoning in anesthesiology via graph-augmented retrieval and explainable generation

Open access
Wang, Meng, Shen, Yangyang, Zhao, Bingcheng, Zhou, Xuefeng, Sun, Lan, Liu, Xing·2025·Health Information Science and Systems

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in anesthesiology decision support, leveraging a graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework to improve analytical reasoning and deliver evidence-driven results. Methods Based on various clinical guidelines and textbooks, we constructed an Anesthesiology Knowledge Graph using UMLS as a reference ontology. We present a graph-based RAG framework, AnesGraph-RAG, which integrates pre-retrieval judgment, hybrid retrieval, and tailored Chain-of-Thought prompting to enhance reasoning performance. Its variant AnesGraph-RAG-UD further incorporates unfamiliarity-driven graph retrieval and structural querying to improve token efficiency. Results The constructed anesthesiology knowledge graph comprises 212313 entities and 529845 relations. Evaluation on the expert-annotated dataset confirms its high entity recall (82.19%) and precision (82.13%). Evaluations on the Anesthesiology Attending Physician Qualification Examination dataset indicate that our framework achieves superior performance over ChatGPT - 3.5-turbo, ChatGPT-4o, and DeepSeek-V3, with relative improvements of 2.4%, 7.3%, and 3.7% in average accuracy, respectively. The performance gains are particularly pronounced in domains assessing professional knowledge and professional practical skills. In addition, our case study demonstrates that the enhanced post-hoc explanation module offers reasoning paths supported by more detailed evidence. Conclusion In conclusion, by integrating structured domain knowledge with adaptive reasoning mechanisms, our graph-based RAG framework improves both the accuracy and interpretability of LLM responses in anesthesiology tasks. These results demonstrate the practical value of combining domain-specific knowledge graphs with LLMs in clinical decision support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13755-025-00379-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alamo CEE, Diatta F, Monsell SE, Lane-Fall MB. Artificial intelligence in anesthetic care: a survey of physician anesthesiologists. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006752. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hurst A, Lerer A, Goucher AP, Perelman A, Ramesh A, Clark A, Ostrow A, Welihinda A, Hayes A, Radford A, et al.: Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 2024. · arXiv
  4. Bedi S, Liu Y, Orr-Ewing L, Dash D, Koyejo S, Callahan A, et al. Testing and evaluation of health care applications of large language models: a systematic review. JAMA. 2024;333(4):319. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Malek MA, Velzen M, Dahan A, Martini C, Sitsen E, Sarton E, et al. Generation of preoperative anaesthetic plans by chatgpt-4.0: a mixed-method study. Br J Anaesthesia. 2024;134:1333. · DOI
  6. Lim DY, Ke YH, Sng GG, Tung JY, Chai JX, Abdullah HR. Large language models in anaesthesiology: use of chatgpt for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131(3):73–5. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chung P, Fong CT, Walters AM, Aghaeepour N, Yetisgen M, O’Reilly-Shah VN. Large language model capabilities in perioperative risk prediction and prognostication. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(8):928–37. · DOI
  8. Fan W, Ding Y, Ning L, Wang S, Li H, Yin D, Chua T-S, Li Q. A survey on rag meeting LLMs: towards retrieval-augmented large language models. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024; pp. 6491–6501. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Edge D, Trinh H, Cheng N, Bradley J, Chao A, Mody A, Truitt S, Metropolitansky D, Ness RO, Larson J. From local to global: A graph rag approach to query-focused summarization. 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16130 · arXiv
  10. Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan JD, Dhariwal P, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020;33:1877–901.
  11. Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, Sutskever I, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog. 2019;1(8):9.
  12. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS’17, pp. 6000–6010. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook; 2017.
  13. Hoffmann J, Borgeaud S, Mensch A, Buchatskaya E, Cai T, Rutherford E, Las Casas D, Hendricks LA, Welbl J, Clark A, Hennigan T, Noland E, Millican K, Driessche G, Damoc B, Guy A, Osindero S, Simonyan K, Elsen E, Vinyals O, Rae JW, Sifre L. Training compute-optimal large language models. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS ’22. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook; 2022.
  14. Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, Petroni F, Karpukhin V, Goyal N, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020;33:9459–74.
  15. Bodenreider O. The unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(suppl–1):267–70. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Guo D, Wu F, Zhu F, Leng F, Shi G, Chen H, Fan H, Wang J, Jiang J, Wang J, et al. Seed1. 5-vl technical report. 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07062 · arXiv
  17. Asai A, Wu Z, Wang Y, Sil A, Hajishirzi H. Self-rag: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations; 2023.
  18. Wei J, Wang X, Schuurmans D, Bosma M, Xia F, Chi E, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2022;35:24824–37.
  19. Maheshwari H, Tenneti S, Nakkiran A. CiteFix: Enhancing RAG accuracy through post-processing citation correction. In: Rehm G, Li Y (eds) Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track), pp. 310–317. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vienna, Austria ; 2025. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-industry.23 . https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-industry.23/ · DOI
  20. Chen J, Cai Z, Ji K, Wang X, Liu W, Wang R, Hou J, Wang B. Huatuogpt-o1, towards medical complex reasoning with llms. 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18925 · arXiv
  21. Abi-Rafeh J, Xu HH, Kazan R, Tevlin R, Furnas H. Large language models and artificial intelligence: a primer for plastic surgeons on the demonstrated and potential applications, promises, and limitations of chatgpt. Aesthetic Surg J. 2024;44(3):329–43. · DOI
  22. Tustumi F, Andreollo NA, Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Future of the language models in healthcare: the role of chatgpt. ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (são paulo). 2023;36:1727. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zhang Y, Pei H, Zhen S, Li Q, Liang F. Chat generative pre-trained transformer (chatgpt) usage in healthcare. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2023;1(3):139–43. · DOI
  24. Bugaj M, Kliestik T, Lăzăroiu G. Generative artificial intelligence-based diagnostic algorithms in disease risk detection, in personalized and targeted healthcare procedures, and in patient care safety and quality. Contemp Read Law Soc Justice. 2023;15(1):9–26. · DOI
  25. Xiao D, Meyers P, Upperman JS, Robinson JR. Revolutionizing healthcare with chatgpt: an early exploration of an ai language model’s impact on medicine at large and its role in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2023;58(12):2410–5. · DOI
  26. Rajjoub R, Arroyave JS, Zaidat B, Ahmed W, Mejia MR, Tang J, et al. Chatgpt and its role in the decision-making for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative analysis and narrative review. Global Spine J. 2024;14(3):998–1017. · DOI
  27. Daher M, Koa J, Boufadel P, Singh J, Fares MY, Abboud JA. Breaking barriers: can chatgpt compete with a shoulder and elbow specialist in diagnosis and management? JSES Int. 2023;7(6):2534–41. · DOI
  28. Rizwan A, Sadiq T. The use of AI in diagnosing diseases and providing management plans: a consultation on cardiovascular disorders with chatgpt. Cureus. 2023;15(8):43106.
  29. Chen TC, Kaminski E, Koduri L, Singer A, Singer J, Couldwell M, et al. Chat gpt as a neuro-score calculator: analysis of a large language model’s performance on various neurological exam grading scales. World Neurosurg. 2023;179:342–7. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Xv Y, Peng C, Wei Z, Liao F, Xiao M. Can chat-gpt a substitute for urological resident physician in diagnosing diseases?: a preliminary conclusion from an exploratory investigation. World J Urol. 2023;41(9):2569–71. · DOI
  31. Grupac M, Zauskova A, Nica E. Generative artificial intelligence-based treatment planning in clinical decision-making, in precision medicine, and in personalized healthcare. Contemp Read Law & Social Justice. 2023;15(1):45. · DOI
  32. Atkinson D. Generative artificial intelligence-based treatment planning in patient consultation and support, in digital health interventions, and in medical practice and education. Contemp Read Law Soc Justice. 2023;15(1):134–51. · DOI
  33. Srivastav S, Chandrakar R, Gupta S, Babhulkar V, Agrawal S, Jaiswal A, et al. Chatgpt in radiology: the advantages and limitations of artificial intelligence for medical imaging diagnosis. Cureus. 2023;15(7):41435–41435.
  34. Gala D, Makaryus AN. The utility of language models in cardiology: a narrative review of the benefits and concerns of chatgpt-4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(15):6438. · DOI
  35. Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. Chatgpt in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell. 2023;6:1169595. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Cheng K, Li Z, He Y, Guo Q, Lu Y, Gu S, et al. Potential use of artificial intelligence in infectious disease: take chatgpt as an example. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(6):1130–5. · DOI
  37. Kottlors J, Bratke G, Rauen P, Kabbasch C, Persigehl T, Schlamann M, et al. Feasibility of differential diagnosis based on imaging patterns using a large language model. Radiology. 2023;308(1):231167. · DOI
  38. Schukow C, Smith SC, Landgrebe E, Parasuraman S, Folaranmi OO, Paner GP, et al. Application of chatgpt in routine diagnostic pathology: promises, pitfalls, and potential future directions. Adv Anat Pathol. 2024;31(1):15–21. · DOI
  39. Vaira LA, Lechien JR, Abbate V, Allevi F, Audino G, Beltramini GA, et al. Accuracy of chatgpt-generated information on head and neck and oromaxillofacial surgery: a multicenter collaborative analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;170(6):1492–503. · DOI
  40. Feng X, Jiang W, Wang Z, Luo Y, Xu P, Yu B, Jin H, Du B, Zhang J. Anesbench: multi-dimensional evaluation of llm reasoning in anesthesiology. 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02404 · arXiv
  41. Zhou B, Zhan Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhang C, Yu B, et al. Benchmarking medical LLMs on anesthesiology: a comprehensive dataset in Chinese. IEEE Trans Emerging Topics Comput Intell. 2025;9(4):3057–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2024.3502465. · DOI
  42. Wang Z, Jiang J, Zhan Y, Zhou B, Li Y, Zhang C, et al. Hypnos: a domain-specific large language model for anesthesiology. Neurocomputing. 2025;624:129389. · DOI
  43. Gao Y, Qiao L, Kan Z, Wen Z, He Y, Li D. Two-stage generative question answering on temporal knowledge graph using large language models. In: Ku, L-W, Martins A, Srikumar V (eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pp. 6719–6734. Association for Computational Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand; 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.401 . https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.401/ · DOI
  44. Khandelwal U, Levy O, Jurafsky D, Zettlemoyer L, Lewis M. Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models. 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00172 · arXiv
  45. Sen P, Mavadia S, Saffari A. Knowledge graph-augmented language models for complex question answering. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Reasoning and Structured Explanations (NLRSE), 2023; 1–8. · DOI
  46. Zhao P, Zhang H, Yu Q, Wang Z, Geng Y, Fu F, Yang L, Zhang W, Jiang J, Cui B. Retrieval-augmented generation for ai-generated content: a survey. 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19473 · arXiv
  47. Kang M, Kwak JM, Baek J, Hwang SJ. Knowledge graph-augmented language models for knowledge-grounded dialogue generation. 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18846 · arXiv
  48. Li H, Li S, Sun J, Xing Z, Peng X, Liu M, Zhao X. Improving api caveats accessibility by mining api caveats knowledge graph. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), 2018;183–193. IEEE · DOI
  49. Luo L, Li Y-F, Haffari G, Pan S. Reasoning on graphs: faithful and interpretable large language model reasoning. 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01061 · arXiv
  50. Varshney D, Zafar A, Behera NK, Ekbal A. Knowledge graph assisted end-to-end medical dialog generation. Artif Intell Med. 2023;139:102535. · DOI
  51. Yu D, Zhu C, Fang Y, Yu W, Wang S, Xu Y, Ren X, Yang Y, Zeng M. Kg-fid: Infusing knowledge graph in fusion-in-decoder for open-domain question answering. 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04330 · DOI
  52. Zhong L, Wu J, Li Q, Peng H, Wu X. A comprehensive survey on automatic knowledge graph construction. ACM Comput Surv. 2023;56(4):1–62. · DOI
  53. Izacard G, Caron M, Hosseini L, Riedel S, Bojanowski P, Joulin A, Grave E. Unsupervised dense information retrieval with contrastive learning. 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09118 · arXiv
  54. Jiang J, Zhou K, Zhao X, Li Y, Wen J-R. ReasoningLM: Enabling structural subgraph reasoning in pre-trained language models for question answering over knowledge graph. In: Bouamor H, Pino J, Bali K (eds) Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 3721–3735. Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore; 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.228 . https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.228/ · DOI
  55. Liu Y, Wan Y, He L, Peng H, Yu PS. Kg-bart: Knowledge graph-augmented bart for generative commonsense reasoning. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2021;35:6418–25.
  56. Tuan, Y-L, Chen, Y-N, Lee, H-y. DyKgChat: Benchmarking dialogue generation grounding on dynamic knowledge graphs. In: Inui K, Jiang J, Ng V, Wan X (eds) Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 1855–1865. Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China; 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1194 . https://aclanthology.org/D19-1194/ · DOI
  57. Wu S, Li Y, Zhang D, Zhou Y, Wu Z. Diverse and informative dialogue generation with context-specific commonsense knowledge awareness. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020; pp. 5811–5820. · DOI
  58. Zhang H, Liu Z, Xiong C, Liu Z. Grounded conversation generation as guided traverses in commonsense knowledge graphs. In: Jurafsky D, Chai J, Schluter N, Tetreault J (eds) Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2031–2043. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.184 . https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.184/ · DOI
  59. Zhou H, Huang M, Liu Y, Chen W, Zhu X. Earl: Informative knowledge-grounded conversation generation with entity-agnostic representation learning. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021; pp. 2383–2395. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Shen, Y., Zhao, B., Zhou, X., Sun, L., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Xing
Venue
Health Information Science and Systems
Published
2025-09-30
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
62-62
ISSN
2047-2501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414645631
Cited by
3
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Information Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2023YFC2506900)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62276063, U23B2057, 62176185)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20221457)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (L247008)
  • Undergraduate education and teaching reform research project of Central South University (2024jy154)
  • China International Medical Exchange Foundation (2017-24-2421)
  • MOE (China) Research Innovation Team on Design-Driven High-Quality Urban Development (20242717)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
large language models, anesthesiology, clinical decision support, knowledge graphs, UMLS, chain-of-thought prompting, post-hoc explanation, hybrid retrieval, token efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing LLM-based clinical reasoning in anesthesiology via graph-augmented retrieval and explainable generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13755-025-00379-x
The paper
Wang, M., Shen, Y., Zhao, B., Zhou, X., Sun, L., & Liu, X. (2025). Enhancing LLM-based clinical reasoning in anesthesiology via graph-augmented retrieval and explainable generation. Health Information Science and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-025-00379-x