Cited by 12Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Safety and Efficacy of Melatonin in Chronic Tension-Type Headache: A Post-Marketing Real-World Surveillance Program

Open access
Danilov, Andrei B., Danilov, Alexey B., Kurushina, Olga V., Shestel, Elena A., Zhivolupov, Sergey A., Latysheva, Nina V.·2020·Pain and Therapy

Abstract

Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most prevalent primary headache. Every year, about 2–3% of patients with TTH progress to chronic TTH with daily or near-daily headache, warranting preventive treatment. The treatment of chronic TTH is complex and very often associated with significant tolerability issues. To date, melatonin has been studied in only a few small uncontrolled trials. The aim of this surveillance program was to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin (Melaxen ® ) in patients with TTH and disruption of circadian rhythms in real-world practice. Sixty-one patients with chronic TTH were enrolled. After the 30-day baseline period, patients took 3 mg of melatonin at bedtime for 30 days with a follow-up period of another 30 days. VAS pain intensity assessments, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), HIT-6 and Levin sleep quality scores were obtained at the baseline visit, at month 1, and month 2. A significant decrease in the number of headache days per month, VAS pain intensity, HAM-A, HAM-D and HIT-6 scores, and an improvement in sleep quality were observed throughout the study. No treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. Melatonin is an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of chronic TTH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40122-020-00207-y

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danilov, A. B., Danilov, A. B., Kurushina, O. V., Shestel, E. A., Zhivolupov, S. A., & Latysheva, N. V.
Affiliations
  • Sechenov University (RU)
  • Volgograd State Medical University (RU)
Venue
Pain and Therapy
Published
2020-10-16
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
741-750
ISSN
  • 2193-651X (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-8237
OpenAlex
W3092955231
Cited by
12
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
melatonin, chronic tension-type headache, primary headache, circadian rhythm disruption, headache prevention, sleep quality, anxiety, depression, treatment safety, real-world effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review