Cited by 914Sleep and related disordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

How do sleep disturbance and chronic pain inter-relate? Insights from the longitudinal and cognitive-behavioral clinical trials literature

Smith, Michael T, Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A·2004·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Sleep disturbance is perhaps one of the most prevalent complaints of patients with chronically painful conditions. Experimental studies of healthy subjects and cross-sectional research in clinical populations suggest the possibility that the relationship between sleep disturbance and pain might be reciprocal, such that pain disturbs sleep continuity/quality and poor sleep further exacerbates pain. This suggests that aggressive management of sleep disturbance may be an important treatment objective with possible benefits beyond the improvement in sleep. Little is known, however, about how to effectively treat sleep disturbance associated with pain or whether such treatment might have beneficial effects on reducing pain. A small, but growing literature has applied cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) for either pain management or insomnia to patients with chronic pain. In this article, we review the longitudinal literature on sleep disturbance associated with chronic pain and clinical trial literatures of cognitive-behavior therapy for pain management and insomnia secondary to chronic pain with the aim of evaluating whether the relationship between clinical pain and insomnia is reciprocal. While methodological problems are common, the literature suggests that the relationship is reciprocal and CBT treatments for pain or insomnia hold promise in reducing pain severity and improving sleep quality. Directions for future research include the use of validated measures of sleep, longitudinal studies, and larger randomized clinical trials incorporating appropriate attentional controls and longer periods of follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1087-0792(03)00044-3

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. T., & Haythornthwaite, J. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Michael T
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
119-132
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167864730
Cited by
914
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 41
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep disorders, chronic pain, insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, pain management, sleep quality, longitudinal study
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Pain, Sleep Wake Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review