Cited by 6Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisSynthesis and biological activity

Design and synthesis of novel bispecific molecules for inducing BRD4 protein degradation

Wang, Shihui, Song, Yuming, Wang, Yue, Gao, Yang, Yu, Shanshan, Zhao, Qianqian, Jin, Xiangqun, Lu, Haibin·2018·Chemical Research in Chinese Universities

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40242-018-7272-5

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Song, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., Yu, S., Zhao, Q., Jin, X., & Lu, H.
Affiliations
Jilin University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jin, Xiangqun
  • Lu, Haibin
Venue
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities
Published
2018-01-03
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
67-74
ISSN
  • 1005-9040 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-3171
OpenAlex
W2782495371
Cited by
6
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and biological activity
Keywords
PROTACs, BRD4, protein degradation, bispecific molecules, bromodomain inhibitors, linker design, RS4, cell proliferation inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review