Cited by 30Diabetes Management and ResearchInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryDiabetes Treatment and Management

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled technosphere insulin and subcutaneous insulin lispro in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus

Open access
Grant, Marshall, Heise, Tim, Baughman, Robert·2022·Clinical Pharmacokinetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses. OBJECTIVES: This single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study defined the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic curves for inhaled TI vs subcutaneous LIS in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Each volunteer received six treatments while undergoing euglycemic clamps: three doses of TI (10, 30 and 120 U) and LIS (8, 30, and 90 U). Primary endpoint was area under the glucose infusion rate vs time curve from start of treatment administration to end of clamp. Key secondary endpoints included readouts of insulin exposure and timing of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. RESULTS: for TI. Time to reach 10% of the maximum glucose infusion rate was 7 to 15 min for TI vs 21 to 38 min for LIS. End of effect was dose dependent for both treatments, ranging from 2 to 6 h (TI) and 5 to 10 h (LIS). Glucose infusion rate exhibited saturation for both treatments. Technosphere Insulin produced a lesser total effect per unit insulin than LIS due to its faster absorption and correspondingly shorter duration of exposure. The difference was large enough to require significantly different doses to achieve the same total effect. CONCLUSIONS: Technosphere Insulin has a considerably faster onset and shorter duration of action than LIS. Consequently, the overall effect of TI is smaller than that of LIS and unit-for-unit dose conversion is not appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02470637; 12 June, 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Afrezza is the fastest-acting exogenous insulin due to rapid absorption from the lungs, and eliminates the delays seen with subcutaneous injection.

    “Afrezza (MannKind, Danbury, CT, USA), a human insulin inhaled powder, is the fastestacting exogenous insulin due to rapid absorption from the lungs, and eliminates the delays seen with subcutaneous injection.84”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say inhaled Technosphere Insulin, sold as Afrezza, has a faster onset than subcutaneous lispro. But they place its time-action profile between IV bolus and subcutaneous insulin; the Introduction reports IV insulin reaching peak concentration sooner. The claim that Afrezza is the fastest-acting exogenous insulin and eliminates injection-related delays therefore overstates the paper's findings. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inhaled insulin has faster onset and shorter duration compared with the rapid-acting insulin analog lispro.

    “Studies comparing inhaled insulin with injectable insulin have demonstrated its faster onset and shorter duration compared with the RAA insulin lispro as well as clinically meaningful A1C reductions and weight reductions compared with the RAA insulin aspart over 24 weeks (186-188).”
  • Inhaled insulin produces clinically meaningful A1C reductions compared with insulin aspart over 24 weeks.

    “Studies comparing inhaled insulin with injectable insulin have demonstrated its faster onset and shorter duration compared with the RAA insulin lispro as well as clinically meaningful A1C reductions and weight reductions compared with the RAA insulin aspart over 24 weeks (186-188).”

    From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [188]

    The Results (Patient Demographics; page unavailable) report baseline glycated hemoglobin, not a change in A1C. The Discussion (Clinical Use; page unavailable) discusses glucose control compared with insulin aspart, and the References list a 24-week trial, but our copy does not report whether inhaled insulin produced clinically meaningful A1C reductions over 24 weeks. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inhaled insulin produces weight reductions compared with insulin aspart over 24 weeks.

    “Studies comparing inhaled insulin with injectable insulin have demonstrated its faster onset and shorter duration compared with the RAA insulin lispro as well as clinically meaningful A1C reductions and weight reductions compared with the RAA insulin aspart over 24 weeks (186-188).”

    From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [188]

    The Discussion > Clinical Use compares inhaled insulin with insulin aspart for time in glucose range and hypoglycemia, but does not report weight changes. The References list a 24-week inhaled-insulin trial; our copy does not state whether that trial found weight reductions compared with aspart. Searched for weight reduction, insulin aspart, and 24-week outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [2]MannKind Corporation. Afrezza® (insulin human) inhalation powder approved in Brazil. In: Investors: press releases. 3 Jun 2019. https://investors.mannkindcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/afrezzar-insulin-human-inhalation-powder-approved-brazil. Accessed 16 Jun 2021.
  2. [3]Rüppel D Dahmen R Boss A A population dose-response model for inhaled Technosphere Insulin administered to healthy subjects CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2017 10.1002/psp4.12189 28568813 PMC5488128 · DOI
  3. [4]Becker RHA Frick AD Nosek L Heinemann L Rave K Dose-response relationship of insulin glulisine in subjects with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2007 10.2337/dc06-2114 17675541 · DOI
  4. [5]Howey D Bowsher R Brunelle R Woodworth J [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin: a rapidly absorbed analogue of human insulin Diabetes 1994 43 396 402 10.2337/diab.43.3.396 8314011 · DOI
  5. [6]Steiner S Pfützner A Wilson B Harzer O Heinemann L Rave K Technosphere/Insulin: proof of concept study with a new insulin formulation for pulmonary delivery Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2002 10.1055/s-2002-1998 11835120 · DOI
  6. [7]Smutney C Grant M Kinsey P Device factors affecting pulmonary delivery of dry powders Ther Deliv 2013 10.4155/tde.13.77 23919473 · DOI
  7. [8]Heurtault B Reix N Meyer N Extensive study of human insulin immunoassays: promises and pitfalls for insulin analogue detection and quantification Clin Chem Lab Med 2014 10.1515/cclm-2013-0427 24150210 · DOI
  8. [9]Rowland M Tozer T Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: concepts and applications 2011 4 Philadelphia Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
  9. [10]Gabrielsson J Weiner D Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis: concepts and applications 2000 4 Stockholm Swedish Pharmaceutical Press
  10. [11]Heise T Hövelmann U Zijlstra E Stender-Petersen K Jacobsen J Haahr H A comparison of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties between faster-acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart in elderly subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus Drugs Aging 2017 10.1007/s40266-016-0418-6 27873152 PMC5222895 · DOI
  11. [12]Heise T Stender-Petersen K Hövelmann U Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of faster-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus Clin Pharmacokinet 2017 10.1007/s40262-016-0473-5 27878566 PMC5425492 · DOI
  12. [13]Heinemann L Traut T Heise T Time-action profile of inhaled insulin Diabet Med 1997 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199701)14:1<63::AID-DIA298>3.0.CO;2-F 9017356 · DOI
  13. [14]McGill J Weiss D Grant M Jones M Kendall D Hoogwerf B Understanding inhaled Technosphere Insulin: results of an early randomized trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus J Diabetes 2020 10.1111/1753-0407.13099 32737923 · DOI
  14. [15]Akturk H Snell-Bergeon JK Rewers A Improved postprandial glucose with inhaled Technosphere Insulin compared with insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections: the STAT study Diabetes Technol Ther 2018 10.1089/dia.2018.0200 30207748 PMC6161328 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [16]Bode B McGill J Lorber D Inhaled Technosphere Insulin compared with injected prandial insulin in type 1 diabetes: a randomized 24-week trial Diabetes Care 2015 10.2337/dc15-0075 26180109 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [17]Boss A Petrucci R Lorber D Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012 10.1177/193229681200600406 22920801 PMC3440146 · DOI
  17. [18]Seaquist ER Blonde L McGill JB Hypoglycaemia is reduced with use of inhaled Technosphere® Insulin relative to insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes mellitus Diabet Med 2020 10.1111/dme.14202 31811662 PMC7216876 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [19]Hompesch M Troupin B Heise T Time-action profile of insulin detemir and NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes from different ethnic groups Diabetes Obes Metab 2006 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00643.x 16918592 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, M., Heise, T., & Baughman, R.
Affiliations
  • MannKind Corporation (United States) (US)
  • Profil Institute for Metabolic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Grant, Marshall
Venue
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Published
2021-11-13
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
413-422
ISSN
  • 0312-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-1926
OpenAlex
W3213041209
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
mannkind corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
inhaled insulin, Technosphere insulin, insulin lispro, type 1 diabetes, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, glucose infusion rate, euglycemic clamp, onset of action, duration of action, dose conversion, insulin absorption
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucose, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Cross-Over Studies, Insulin Lispro

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review