Cited by 16Diabetes Management and ResearchInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryDiabetes Treatment and Management

Time–Action Profile of Technosphere Insulin in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Haller, Michael J., Jones, Marisa C., Bhavsar, Sunil, Kaiserman, Kevin B.·2023·Diabetes Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Technosphere insulin (TI) is an inhaled dry powder ultra-rapid-acting insulin. This report describes the results of the first study of TI in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics (PK) of TI and the effect of TI on circulating glucose concentrations were evaluated in a single-arm study that enrolled children ages 8-17 years with T1D for more than 1 year, on a stable multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) regimen, and meeting pre-defined pulmonary function testing criteria (at least 70% predicted). To assess PK, subjects received an individualized single preprandial dose of TI (4-12 U, in 4-U increments) via oral inhalation, based on their usual meal-time subcutaneously injected rapid-acting insulin dose and meal content. Serum insulin and blood glucose were measured at - 30 to 250 min relative to dosing. RESULTS: occurred at 10.5, 13.9, and 14.6 min post-dose for 4, 8, and 12 U. Glucose lowering 30-60 min post-dose was consistent with the PK profile. CONCLUSION: Serum insulin rapidly increased post-dose and returned to baseline by 120 min. The data suggests the PK of TI in youth with T1D ages 8-17 years was similar to that seen in previous adult studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02527265.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13300-023-01368-7

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary studies in children have shown promising results for Afrezza.

    “Preliminary studies in children have shown promising results, 86”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haller, M. J., Jones, M. C., Bhavsar, S., & Kaiserman, K. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • MannKind Corporation (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kaiserman, Kevin B.
Venue
Diabetes Therapy
Published
2023-01-18
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
611-617
ISSN
  • 1869-6953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6961
OpenAlex
W4317208429
Cited by
16
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
MannKind Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
Technosphere insulin, inhaled insulin, type 1 diabetes, children, pharmacokinetics, ultra-rapid-acting insulin, serum insulin, blood glucose, lung function, multiple daily insulin injections, oral inhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review