Cited by 539Sports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsPhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 192 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Science of Badminton: Game Characteristics, Anthropometry, Physiology, Visual Fitness and Biomechanics

Phomsoupha, Michael, Laffaye, Guillaume·2015·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Badminton is a racket sport for two or four people, with a temporal structure characterized by actions of short duration and high intensity. This sport has five events: men's and women's singles, men's and women's doubles, and mixed doubles, each requiring specific preparation in terms of technique, control and physical fitness. Badminton is one of the most popular sports in the world, with 200 million adherents. The decision to include badminton in the 1992 Olympics Game increased participation in the game. This review focuses on the game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual attributes and biomechanics of badminton. Players are generally tall and lean, with an ectomesomorphic body type suited to the high physiological demands of a match. Indeed, a typical match characteristic is a rally time of 7 s and a resting time of 15 s, with an effective playing time of 31%. This sport is highly demanding, with an average heart rate (HR) of over 90% of the player's maximal HR. The intermittent actions during a game are demanding on both the aerobic and anaerobic systems: 60-70% on the aerobic system and approximately 30% on the anaerobic system, with greater demand on the alactic metabolism with respect to the lactic anaerobic metabolism. The shuttlecock has an atypical trajectory, and the players perform specific movements such as lunging and jumping, and powerful strokes using a specific pattern of movement. Lastly, badminton players are visually fit, picking up accurate visual information in a short time. Knowledge of badminton can help to improve coaching and badminton skills.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2

Cites

191 of 191 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Abe K, Okamoto S. Badminton. Tokyo: Gy; 1989.
  2. Ming CL, Keong CC, Ghosh AK. Time motion and notational analysis of 21 point and 15 point badminton match play. Int J Sport Sci Eng. 2008;2(4):216–22.
  3. Jack M, Adrian M. Characteristics of the badminton smash stroke. In: Groppel JL, editor. Proceedings of a national symposium on racket sports: an exploration of research implications and teaching strategies. Urbana-Champaigne: University of Illinois; 1979. p. 27–42.
  4. Ismail MSH, Boon Suen A, Othman CN, et al. Comparison of anthropometric variables and leg strength of volleyball, basketball and badminton players. Malays J Med Lab Sci. 1993;10(1):26–30.
  5. Reilly T. The racket sports. In: Reilly T, Secher N, Snell P, et al., editors. Physiology in Sports. London: Chapman & Hall; 1990. p. 337–70.
  6. Lei RR, Deng SX, Lu LF. Study on the physiological function, physical quality and mental characteristics of Chinese badminton players. Chinese Sport Sci Technol. 1993;29:28–38.
  7. Subramanian A. Investigation of the factors predominent to badminton playing ability. Acad Sport Sch. 2013;2(8):1–6.
  8. Krakowiak H, Cabric M, Sokolowska E, et al. Body structure and composition of short distance runners. Polish J Sport Med. 2008;24(1):30–6.
  9. Charzewski J, Glaz A, Kuzmicki S. Somatotype characteristics of Elite european wrestlers. Biol Sport. 1991;8(4):213–21.
  10. Poliszczuk T, Mosakowska M. Antropometryczny profil elitarnych badmintonistów z Polski. Med Sport. 2010;1(6):45–55.
  11. Revan S, Aydogmus M, Balci SS, et al. The evaluation of some physical and physiological characteristics of Turkish and foreign national badminton team players. J Phys Educ Sport Sci. 2007;1(2):63–70.
  12. Ramos-Álvarez JJ, Campos DC, Portes P. Analysis of the physiological parameters of junior spanish badminton players [in press]. Rev Int Med Cienc Act Fís Deporte. 2013.
  13. Amusa LO, Toriola AL, Dhaliwal HS, et al. Anthropometric profile of Botswana junior national badminton players. J Hum Mov Stud. 2001;40(2):115–28.
  14. Ooi CH, Sidek M. Physiological strain in world class women badminton player during training and competition: a case study. In: Singh B, Wilson B, Tan Chek Hiong E, et al., editors. Institut Sukan Negara Bulletin: 2010. p. 1–12.
  15. Mikkelsen F. Physical demands and muscle adaptation in elite badminton players. In: Terauds J, editor. Science in racket sport. Del Mar: Academic Publishers; 1979. p. 55–67.
  16. Lieshout KAV, Lombard AJJ. Fitness profile of elite junior badminton players in South Africa. Afr Phys Health Educ Recreat Dance. 2003;9(3):114–20.
  17. Bartunkova S, Safarik V, Melicharova E, et al. Energetic ky vydaju badmintonu. Teor Praxe Tel Vych. 1979;27(6):369–72.
  18. Singh BB, Singh J. A comparative study on somatotypes of north zone badminton and tennis players. Variorum Multidiscip eRes J. 2011;2(1):1–8.
  19. Hussain S. Somatotype and body composition of adolescent badminton players in Kerala. Int J Adv Sci Tech Res. 2013;6(3):105–11.
  20. Faulkner JA. Physiology of swimming and diving. In: Fall, editor. Exercice physiology. New York: Academic Press; 1968. p. 415–46.
  21. Jeyaraman R, District E, Nadu T. Prediction of playing ability in badminton from selected anthropometrical physical and physiological characteristics among inter collegiate players. Int J Adv Innov Res. 2012;2(3):11.
  22. Tiwari LM, Rai V, Srinet S. Relationship of selected motor fitness components with the performance of badminton player. Asian J Phys Educ Comput Sci Sports. 2011;5(1):88–91.
  23. Sarshin A, Mohammadi S, Shahrabad HBP, et al. The effects of functional fatigue on dynamic postural control of badminton players. Biol Exerc. 2011;7(2):26–34.
  24. Araragi K, Omori M, Iwata H. The physiological studies on physical demands in competitive badminton: an investigation from the view points of energy expenditure, caloric intake and changes of blood constituents during a training camp. Acta Sch Med Univ Kioto. 1999;47:215–27.
  25. Dias R, Ghosh AK. Physiological evaluation of specific training in badminton. In: Reilly T, Hughes MG, Lees A, editors. Science in Racket Sport. London: E&FN Spon; 1995. p. 38–43.
  26. Abe K, Haga S, Kato M, et al. The work intensity of a badminton match in Japanese top female athletes. Bull Health Sport Sci. 1989;12:107–14.
  27. Abe K, Haga S, Kato M, et al. The work intensity of a badminton match in Japanese top male athletes. Bull Health Sport Sci. 1990;13:73–80.
  28. Singh R. Assessment of physiological variables of badminton players. Int J Behav Soc Mov Sci. 2012;1(4):166–73.
  29. Miao SK, Wang SW, Lu SZ. The relationship of physiological characteristics and training of badminton players during competition. Chinese Sport Sci Technol. 1979;1:28–35.
  30. Miao SK. Physiological foundation of badminton players during competition. Chinese Sport Sci Technol. 1986;8:1–6.
  31. Miao SK. Effect of badminton competition and training in top players’ heart rate, blood lactate and oxygen debt. Acta Physiol Sinica. 1980;32:351–6.
  32. Hughes M. Physiological demands of training in elite badminton players. In: Reilly T, Hughes MG, Lees A, editors. Science and Racket Sports. London: E&FN Spon; 1994. p. 32–7.
  33. Hughes MG, Andrew M, Ramsay R. A sport-specific endurance performance test for elite badminton players. J Sports Sci. 2002;21:277–8.
  34. Seonjin K, Seungmin L, Ryu D, et al. How do national badminton players utilize advanced visual cues to anticipate an attacker’s intent? J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:97.
  35. De Freitas PB. Influence of the performance level of badminton players in neuromotor aspects during a target-pointing task. Braz J Sports Med. 2012;18(33):203–7.
  36. Lee S, Goo H. Development of multi-channel video and sound integration system for measurement of ability of badminton players to predict shuttlecock hit. Int J Appl Sport Sci. 2007;19(1):1–13.
  37. Hagemann N, Memmert D. Coaching anticipatory skill in badminton laboratory versus field based perceptual training. J Hum Mov Stud. 2006;50:381–98.
  38. Tang HP, Abe K, Katoh K, et al. Three-dimensional cinematographic analysis of the badminton forehand smash: movements of the forearm and hand. Science and Racket Sports. Cambridge: E&FN Spon; 1995.
  39. Tong GF. Mechanics analysis of a shuttlecock terminal velocity [abstract]. Master’s Thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University. 2004.
  40. Mccreary KM. A study of the motion of a free falling shuttlecock. Wooster Phys Jr Thesis. 2005. p. 1–5.
  41. Montagny J. Transient behaviour of flexible structures. Application to badminton rackets. Mech Ind. 2003;4(2):113–8.
  42. Smith DR, Ludwig KM, Butcher GM, et al. A comparison of three racket skills executed by novice and experienced performers. In: Abrantes JMCS, editor. 14th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Madeira: 1996. p. 240–3.
  43. Domone S, Wheat J, Choppin S, et al. Wavelet based denoising of non stationary kinematic signals. In: Bradshaw EJ, Burnett A, Hume PA, editors. 30th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Melbourne: 2012. p. 376–9.
  44. Lees A, Hurley C. Forces in a badminton lunge movement. In: Reilly T, Hughes M, Lees A, editors. Science and Racket Sports. Cambridge: E&FN Spon; 1994. p. 249–56.
  45. Smith N, Lees A. An ergonomic evaluation of the shoe-surface interface in badminton. In: Reilly T, Hughes MG, Lees A, editors. Science and Racket Sports. London: E&FN Spon; 1994. p. 121–4.
  46. Gowitzke BA, Waddell DB. Technique of badminton stroke production: science in badminton. In: Terauds J, editor. Racket Sport. Del Mar: Academic Publishers; 1979. p. 17–41.
  47. Gowitzke BA, Waddell DB. A force platform study of overhead power strokes in badminton. In: Groppel JL, editor. Proceedings: International Symposium on the Effective Teaching of Racket Sports. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois; 1980. p. 37–47.
  48. Gowitzke BA, Waddell DB. Badminton underarm power strokes. Int J Sport Biomech. 1987;3(2):162.
  49. Gowitzke BA, Waddell DB. Biomechanical studies of badminton overhead power strokes—a review. In: Tant CL, Patterson PE, York SL, editors. 9th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports. Iowa: 1991. p. 103–109.
  50. Tsai CL, Chang SS, Huang C. Biomechanical analysis of differences in the badminton smash and jump smash between Taiwan elite and collegiate players. In: Riehle HJ, Vieten MM, editors. 16th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Konstanz: 1998. p. 259–62.
  51. Jackson SL, Tanner EA. Analysis of elite and novice disc golfers performing 10 m putts. In: Hamill J, Derrick TR, Elliott EH, editors. 11st International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Massachusetts: 1993. p. 368–70.
  52. Lee BK. The effects of the kinematic link principle on performance. In: Hamill J, Derrick TR, Elliott EH, editors. 11st International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Massachusetts: 1993. p. 239–42.
  53. Lees A. What biomechanics can tell the coach? In: IV World Coaching Conference. Valencia: 2001. p. 19–30.
  54. Strohmeyer HS, Armstrong C, Litvinsky Y, et al. Intersegmental coordination differences between beginning performers executing a badminton smash for accuracy of velocity. In: Harrison A, Anderson R, Kenny I, editors. 27th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports. Limerick: 2009. p. 1.
  55. Gowitzke BA, Waddell DB. The contributions of biomechanics in solving problems in badminton stroke production. In: International Coaching Conference. Malmo: 1977.
  56. Waddell DB, Gowitzke BA. Analysis of overhead badminton power strokes using high speed bi-plane cinematography. In: International Coaching Conference. Malmo: 1977.
  57. Seki K. Movement analysis of badminton [in Japanese with English abstract]. Bull Waseda Univ. 1983;15:103–6.
  58. Poole JR. Badminton. California: Goodyear Publishing Co; 1969.
  59. Strohmeyer HS, Hudson JL. Interception and intersegmental coordination: effects of practise. In: Tant CL, Patterson PE, York SL, editors. 9th international conference of biomechanics in sports. Iowa: 1991. p. 227–31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Phomsoupha, M., & Laffaye, G.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Phomsoupha, Michael
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2014-12-31
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
473-495
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2011609014
Cited by
539
References
192
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Badminton World Federation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
badminton, game features, anthropometry, physiological demands, biomechanics, heart rate, aerobic and anaerobic metabolism, match structure
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Biomechanical Phenomena, Competitive Behavior, Energy Metabolism, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Reaction Time, Sweating, Visual Perception, Racquet Sports, Lactic Acid, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review