Cited by 164Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSports and Physical Education Studies

Shifting the physical inactivity curve worldwide by closing the gender gap

Mielke, Grégore I., da Silva, Inacio Crochemore M., Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy L., Brown, Wendy J.·2018·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this study were to (i) examine gender differences in physical inactivity in countries with different levels of Human Development Index (HDI); and (ii) assess whether small changes in the prevalence of inactivity in women could achieve the World Health Organization's (WHO) global inactivity target.Methods Data on inactivity were extracted for 142 countries for the year 2010 from the WHO Data Repository. Data for HDI were obtained for the year 2010 from the United Nations Development Program. Absolute and relative gender differences were calculated for countries according to four HDI categories. The potential effects of increasing women's activity levels on achievement of the WHO physical inactivity target were computed.Results Overall inactivity prevalence was higher in women (27%) than in men (20%). Women were more inactive than men in all except eight countries. Absolute gender differences [median 7.5% (range -10.1 to 33.2)] did not vary by HDI category, but there was a small negative correlation between relative gender difference in inactivity and HDI (rho -0.19; p = 0.02), which was mostly influenced by three outlier countries with low HDI. A decrease in inactivity levels of 4.8% points among women across the world would achieve the WHO target of reducing global levels of inactivity by 10%.Conclusion Gender differences in the prevalence of physical inactivity were highly variable, both within and across categories of HDI. Interventions which result in small changes in inactivity prevalence in women would achieve the 2025 WHO global target for inactivity, without any change to the prevalence in men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-017-0754-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mielke, G. I., da Silva, I. C. M., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., & Brown, W. J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Mielke, Grégore I.
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2017-06-24
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
481-489
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2705405295
Cited by
164
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
physical inactivity, gender differences, women's physical activity, Human Development Index, global health targets, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Pregnancy, Sex Factors, Global Health, Exercise, Prevalence, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review