Cited by 1,727Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesHealth Education and Validation

Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)

Armstrong, Timothy, Bull, Fiona·2006·Journal of Public Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, T., & Bull, F.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Timothy
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
2006-03-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
66-70
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-2238
OpenAlex
W2030238207
Cited by
1,727
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 32
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, physical activity measurement, physical activity surveillance, questionnaire development, cross-cultural validity, reliability statistics, developing countries, energy expenditure, physical activity policy, World Health Organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review