Cited by 127Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epigenetic Research in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: the “Tissue Issue”

Open access
Bakulski, Kelly M., Halladay, Alycia, Hu, Valerie W., Mill, Jonathan, Fallin, M. Daniele·2016·Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Evidence has linked neuropsychiatric disorders with epigenetic marks as either a biomarker of disease, biomarker of exposure, or mechanism of disease processes. Neuropsychiatric epidemiologic studies using either target brain tissue or surrogate blood tissue each have methodological challenges and distinct advantages.Recent findings Brain tissue studies are challenged by small sample sizes of cases and controls, incomplete phenotyping, post-mortem timing, and cellular heterogeneity, but the use of a primary disease relevant tissue is critical. Blood-based studies have access to much larger sample sizes and more replication opportunities, as well as the potential for longitudinal measurements, both prior to onset and during the course of treatments. Yet, blood studies also are challenged by cell-type heterogeneity, and many question the validity of using peripheral tissues as a brain biomarker. Emerging evidence suggests that these limitations to blood-based epigenetic studies are surmountable, but confirmation in target tissue remains important.Summary Epigenetic mechanisms have the potential to help elucidate biology connecting experiential risk factors with neuropsychiatric disease manifestation. Cross-tissue studies as well as advanced epidemiologic methods should be employed to more effectively conduct neuropsychiatric epigenetic research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40473-016-0083-4

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–127 of 127

Metadata

Authors
Bakulski, K. M., Halladay, A., Hu, V. W., Mill, J., & Fallin, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Fallin, M. Daniele
Venue
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
264-274
ISSN
2196-2979 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2505166506
Cited by
127
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES017646, ES023061)
  • Medical Research Council (MRC; MR/K013807/1)
  • National Institutes of Health (AG036039)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
epigenetics, neuropsychiatric disorders, blood-based biomarkers, brain tissue, surrogate tissue, cellular heterogeneity, postmortem brain, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review