CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentVoice and Speech Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differential Diagnosis of Pediatric Speech Sound Disorder

Open access
Dodd, Barbara·2014·Current Developmental Disorders Reports
DOI 10.1007/s40474-014-0017-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40474-014-0017-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Mullen R, Schooling T. The national outcomes measurement system for pediatric speech-language pathology. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010;41:44–60. · DOI
  2. Broomfield J, Dodd B. The nature of referred subtypes of primary speech disability. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2004;20(2):135–51. · DOI
  3. Bishop D, Nation K, Patterson K. When words fail us: insights onto language processing from developmental and acquired disorders. Philos Trans Roy Soc B. 2013;369:20120403. Review addressing current research challenges in developmental communication disorders. · DOI
  4. Waring R, Knight R. How should children with speech sound disorders be classified? A review and critical evaluation of current classification systems. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(1):25–40. Review of current SSD classification systems: a genetically based medical model; a psycholinguistic model for identification of speech processing deficits; and subgroups with distinct speech error characteristics, differing performance profiles and response to specific intervention approach. · DOI
  5. Johnson C, Beitchman J, Brownlie E. Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: family, educational, occupational, and quality of life outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;19(1):51–65. · DOI
  6. Holm A, Dodd B. An intervention case study of a bilingual child with phonological disorder. Child Lang Teach Ther. 1999;15:139–58. · DOI
  7. Baker E, McLeod S. Evidence based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 1 a narrative review. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011;42:102–39. Description of past research forming the knowledge base for clinical decision making, illustrating problematic issues: heterogeneous participant selection, limited measures and widely differing amounts, types and scheduling of intervention. · DOI
  8. Lewis BA, Shriberg LD, Freebairn LA, Hansen AJ, Stein CM, Taylor HG, et al. The genetic bases of speech sound disorders: evidence from spoken and written language. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49:1294–312. · DOI
  9. Limbrick N, McCormack J, McLeod S. Designs and decisions: the creation of informal measures for assessing speech production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15(3):296–311. · DOI
  10. McKean C, Letts C, Howard D. Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: the case of phonotactic probability and non-word repetition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:1579–94. An experimental study that longitudinally explores children’s non-word repetition, demonstrating how developmental trajectories provide insights primary language impairment and what PWM tasks measure. · DOI
  11. Broomfield J, Dodd B. Epidemiology of speech disorders. In: Dodd B, editor. Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with of speech disorder. 2nd ed. London: Whurr; 2005.
  12. Newbold E, Stackhouse J, Wells B. Tracking change in children with severe and persisting speech difficulties. Clin Linguis Phon. 2013;27(6–7):521–39. · DOI
  13. Macrae T, Tyler A, Lewis. Lexical and phonological variability in preschool children with speech sound disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360 . A study demonstrating how precise description of speech errors, combined with other cognitive-linguistic abilities can inform theoretical understanding of specific subgroups of SSD and direct development of novel intervention approaches. · DOI
  14. Dodd B, Holm A, Crosbie S, McIntosh B. Core vocabulary intervention for inconsistent speech disorder. In: Williams P, McLeod S, McCauley R, editors. Interventions for speech sound disorders in children. New York: Brookes; 2010. p. 117–36.
  15. Stampe D. A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland Publishing; 1973.
  16. Dodd B, Zhu H, Crosbie S, Holm A, Ozanne A. Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology. London: Psychological Corporation; 2002. Standardised in the USA, 2006; Ireland 2012.
  17. Kent R. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1996;5(3):7–23. · DOI
  18. Namasivayam A, Pukonen M, Goshulak D, Yu V, Kadis D, Kroll R, et al. Relationship between speech motor control and speech intelligibility in children with speech sound disorders. J Commun Disord. 2013;46(3):264–80. · DOI
  19. McAllister Byun T. Bidirectional perception–production relations in phonological development: evidence from positional neutralization. Clin Linguist Phon. 2012;26(5):397–413. · DOI
  20. Gathercole SE. Nonword repetition and word learning: the nature of the relationship. Appl Psycholinguist. 2006;27:513–43. · DOI
  21. Keren-Portnoy T, Vihman M, DePaolis R, Whitaker C, Williams M. The role of vocal practice in constructing phonological working memory. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(5):1280–93. · DOI
  22. Rvachew S, Brosseau-Lapré F. Developmental phonological disorders: foundations of clinical practice. Sandiago: Plural Publishing; 2012.
  23. Romberg A, Saffran J. Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010;1(6):906–14. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Dodd B, McIntosh B. Two-year old phonology: impact of input, motor and cognitive abilities on development. J Child Lang. 2010;37(5):1027–46. · DOI
  25. Dodd B. Differentiating speech delay from disorder: does it matter? Top Lang Disord. 2011;31(2):93–5. The term ‘speech delay’ is used generically, obviating differences between children who are acquiring phonology slowly from those who have a cognitive-linguistic deficit in speech processing. The study examines similarities and differences between the two groups. · DOI
  26. Preston J, Hull M, Edwards M-L. Preschool speech error patterns predict articulation and phonological awareness outcomes in children with histories of speech sound disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22:173–84. The longitudinal study demonstrates how atypical (as opposed to developmental) speech error types in the preschool years can predict literacy difficulties once children reach school. · DOI
  27. Im-Bolter N, Johnson J, Pascual-Leone J. Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: the role of executive function. Child Dev. 2006;77(6):1822–41. · DOI
  28. Law J, Reilly S, Snow P. Child speech, language and communication need re-examined in a public health context: a new direction for the speech and language therapy profession. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(5):486–96. An argument is made for implementation of a public health model to provide services for children with communication difficulties, given the poor outcomes of current clinical management. · DOI
  29. Lesniak A, Myers L, Dodd B. The English phonological awareness skills of 5;0–6;0-year-old Polish–English, Portuguese–English bilingual speakers and English monolingual children. J Speech Lang Hear. 2014;17(1):37–48. · DOI
  30. Shriberg L, Lohmeier H, Campbell T, Dollaghan C, Green J, Moore C. A nonword repetition task for speakers with misarticulations: the Syllable Repetition Task (SRT). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52(5):1189–212. · DOI
  31. Baker E, McLeod S. Evidence based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 2 application to clinical practice. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011;42:140–51. · DOI
  32. Lousada M, Jesus L, Capelas S, Margac¸ C, Simoes D, Valente A, et al. Phonological and articulation treatment approaches in Portuguese children with speech and language impairments: a randomized controlled intervention study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(2):172–87. · DOI
  33. Stackhouse J, Wells B. Children’s speech and literacy difficulties: a psycholinguistic framework. London: Whurr; 1997.
  34. Dodd B. Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with of speech disorder. 2nd ed. London: Whurr; 2005.
  35. Wren Y, McLeod S, White P, Miller L, Roulstone S. Speech characteristics of 8-year-old children: findings from a prospective population study. J Commun Disord. 2013;46:53–69. Disturbing prospective data concerning the persistence of SSD in a large infant-eight year cohort in the UK. · DOI
  36. Dodd B, Hua Z, Shatford C. Does speech disorder spontaneously resolve? In: Barriere I, Morgan G, Chiat S, Woll B, editors. Current research in language and communication science. London: City University London; 2000.
  37. Dodd B. Assessment and intervention for two-year olds at risk for phonological disorder. In: Bowen C, editor. Children's speech sound disorders. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2014. The two publications provide a rationale and an assessment tool for identifying two-year-old children with phonological disorder. Presence of atypical speech errors at two years predicts speech disorder one year later, providing evidence for the need for early intervention for SSD.
  38. McIntosh B, Dodd B. Toddler phonology test. London: Pearson Publishers; 2011. The two publications provide a rationale and an assessment tool for identifying two-year-old children with phonological disorder. Presence of atypical speech errors at two years predicts speech disorder one year later, providing evidence for the need for early intervention for SSD.
  39. Stoel-Gammon C, Williams L. Early phonological development: creating an assessment test. Clin Linguist Phon. 2013;27(4):278–86. · DOI
  40. Ttofari Eecen K. Early identification, prediction, and classification of speech sound disorders in the preschool years. PhD thesis, Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne. 2011. ([ http://repository.unimelb.edu.au/10187/11612 ].
  41. Dodd B, Holm A, Oerlemans M, MacCormack M. Queensland University Inventory of Literacy. St Lucia: University of Queensland; 1995.
  42. Dodd B, Crosbie S, McIntosh B, Teitzel T, Ozanne A. The primary and preschool inventory of phonological awareness. London: Psychological Corporation; 2000. Re-standardised in the USA, 2002.
  43. Dodd B, McIntosh B. The input processing, cognitive linguistic and oromotor skills of children with speech difficulty. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10:169–78. · DOI
  44. Broomfield J, Dodd B. Is Speech and Language Therapy effective for children with speech/language impairment? A report of an RCT. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(6):628–40. This paper reports an RCT of service provision for children with SSD using classification of subgroups according to speech error characteristics. Children receiving intervention appropriate for their subgroup showed statistical and clinically important progress in comparison to untreated peers. · DOI
  45. Crosbie S, Holm A, Dodd B. Interventions for children with severe speech disorder: a comparison of two approaches. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005;40:467–92. · DOI
  46. Dodd B, Crosbie S, McIntosh B, Holm A, et al. The impact of selecting different contrasts in phonological therapy. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10(5):334–45. · DOI
  47. Zhu H, Dodd B, editors. Phonological development and disorders in children: a cross-linguistic perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dodd, B.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Dodd, Barbara
ORCID
Dodd, Barbara
Venue
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-05-13
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
189-196
ISSN
2196-2987 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/s40474-014-0017-3
OpenAlex
W2093134506
Cited by
236
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Current Developmental Disorders Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
differential diagnosis, phonological competence, speech errors, speech development, reading and writing difficulties, speech therapy, diagnostic guidelines, articulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review