Cited by 282Disability Education and EmploymentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Employment for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Review of the Research Literature

Open access
Chen, June L., Leader, Geraldine, Sung, Connie, Leahy, Michael·2015·Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40489-014-0041-6

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cameto, R. (2003). Findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2(NLTS2): collecting and utilizing postschool outcome data to improve transition programs and services at the national, state and local levels. Menlo Park: SRI International.
  2. Health Service Executive. (2012). National review of autism services: Past, present and way forward. Retrieved from www.fedvol.ie/_fileupload/Next%20Steps/autismreview2012.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J. L., Leader, G., Sung, C., & Leahy, M.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Leader, Geraldine
Venue
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2014-12-24
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
115-127
ISSN
  • 2195-7177 (ISSN-L)
  • 2195-7185
OpenAlex
W2085992067
Cited by
282
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, employment, supported employment, employment effects, barriers to employment, social difficulties, comorbidities, family support, employer perceptions, employment and training programs, transition services, assistive technology, multidisciplinary collaboration, autistic adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review