Training Behavior Change Agents and Parents to Implement Discrete Trial Teaching: a Literature Review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leaf et al. (2019) is the only review summarizing the research on training individuals to implement DTT procedures.
“Although the implementation of DTT procedures is the most commonly targeted skill in the BST literature (59% of articles reviewed by Gerencser et al., 2020, and 34% of articles reviewed by Marano et al., 2020), Leaf et al. (2019) is the only review summarizing the research on training individuals to implement DTT procedures.”
From Training individuals to implement discrete‐trial teaching procedures using behavioral skills training: A scoping review with implications for practice and research (2024) · cites this paper as Leaf et al. (2019)
Leaf et al. (2019) considered all training approaches separately and did not conceptualize the components within the framework of BST.
“The results indicated robust literature on training individuals to implement DTT; however, Leaf et al. considered all training approaches separately (i.e., it did not conceptualize the components within the framework of BST).”
From Training individuals to implement discrete‐trial teaching procedures using behavioral skills training: A scoping review with implications for practice and research (2024) · cites this paper as Leaf et al. (2019)
Cites
SOME GENERALIZATION AND FOLLOW‐UP MEASURES ON AUTISTIC CHILDREN IN BEHAVIOR THERAPY <sup>1</sup>
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-131 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
VIDEO MODELING TO TRAIN STAFF TO IMPLEMENT DISCRETE‐TRIAL INSTRUCTION
Catania, C. N., Almeida, D., Liu‐Constant, B., & Reed, F. D. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-387 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Effects of training and feedback on Discrete Trial Teaching skills and student performance
Downs, A., Downs, R. C., & Rau, K. (2008) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2007.05.001 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Briggs, A. M., Zohr, S. J., & Harvey, O. B. (2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.1024 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leaf, J. B., Aljohani, W. A., Milne, C. M., Ferguson, J. L., Cihon, J. H., Oppenheim-Leaf, M. L., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R.
- Affiliations
- Endicott College (US)
- Autism Partnership Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leaf, Justin B.
- Venue
- Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Published
- 2018-10-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-39
- ISSN
- 2195-7177 (ISSN-L)
- 2195-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2896723820
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- discrete trial teaching, autism spectrum disorder, parent training, implementation training, task analysis, training protocols, training duration, augmentative and alternative communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
