Cited by 12Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

It’s raining men: descriptive results for engaging men with eating disorders in a specialized male assessment and treatment track (MATT)

MacNeil, Brad A., Hudson, Chloe C., Leung, Pauline·2018·Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity

Abstract

Purpose Men with eating disorders are not well understood and there is a need for innovative methods for engaging men in specialized outpatient assessment and treatment. We examined data collected over a 4-year period to explore whether the addition of a designated track for men at a hospital-based adult eating disorders program influenced the number of referrals or treatment engagement. Methods During assessment and treatment as usual (ATAU; September 2013-August 2015), 283 referrals were received (275 women, 8 men), with 3 men engaging in assessment and treatment (M age = 36 years, SD = 14.18). After instatement of a male assessment and treatment track (MATT; September 2015-August 2017), 320 referrals were received (300 women, 20 men), with 14 men engaging in the specialized assessment and treatment (M age = 28.21 years, SD = 8.04). Both groups of men completed measures of demographic characteristics, life satisfaction, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and eating disorder symptoms. Results Significantly more referrals for men, but not women, were received after the instatement of the MATT (i.e., a 250% increase). More men also engaged in specialized assessment and treatment after the instatement of the MATT (i.e., a 467% increase in engagement). Conclusions The current study describes the number of referrals and the number of men who engaged in treatment before and after the instatement of a specialized treatment track for men. The results suggest that the addition of the MATT helped to increase the number of men referred and promoted their engagement in recommended care. Level of evidence V retrospective descriptive study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40519-018-0586-y

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacNeil, B. A., Hudson, C. C., & Leung, P.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
MacNeil, Brad A.
Venue
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2018-10-10
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
817-824
ISSN
  • 1124-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-1262
OpenAlex
W2897199420
Cited by
12
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
eating disorders in men, treatment engagement, referral rates, life satisfaction, anxiety and depression, eating disorder symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review