Cited by 32Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationEducational Technology in Learning

Social Media: Portrait of an Emerging Tool in Medical Education

Roy, Durga, Taylor, Jacob, Cheston, Christine C., Flickinger, Tabor E., Chisolm, Margaret S.·2016·Academic Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The authors compare the prevalence of challenges and opportunities in commentaries and descriptive accounts versus evaluative studies of social media use in medical education.Methods A previously published report of social media use in medical education provided an in-depth discussion of 14 evaluative studies, a small subset of the total number of 99 articles on this topic. This study used the full set of articles identified by that review, including the 58 commentaries and 27 descriptive accounts which had not been previously reported, to provide a glimpse into how emerging tools in medical education are initially perceived. Each commentary, descriptive account, and evaluative study was identified and compared on various characteristics, including discussion themes regarding the challenges and opportunities of social media use in medical education.Results Themes related to the challenges of social media use in medical education were more prevalent in commentaries and descriptive accounts than in evaluative studies. The potential of social media to affect medical professionalism adversely was the most commonly discussed challenge in the commentaries (53%) and descriptive accounts (63%) in comparison to technical issues related to implementation in the evaluative studies (50%).Conclusions Results suggest that the early body of literature on social media use in medical education-like that of previous innovative education tools-comprises primarily commentaries and descriptive accounts that focus more on the challenges of social media than on potential opportunities. These results place social media tools in historical context and lay the groundwork for expanding on this novel approach to medical education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40596-014-0278-5

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other reviews presented a full spectrum of social media-related challenges and opportunities in the context of medical professionalism of diverse types of health care professionals or in the context of social media as an emerging tool in education, but these studies were conducted several years ago.

    “Other reviews presented a full spectrum of SM-related challenges and opportunities in the context of medical professionalism of diverse types of HCPs [15,16] or in the context of SM as an emerging tool in education [132,186], but these studies were conducted several years ago.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, D., Taylor, J., Cheston, C. C., Flickinger, T. E., & Chisolm, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Chisolm, Margaret S.
Venue
Academic Psychiatry
Published
2015-03-24
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
136-140
ISSN
  • 1042-9670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7230
OpenAlex
W2014406583
Cited by
32
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
social media, medical education, opportunities and challenges, medical professionalism, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review