A Critical Review of Five Commonly Used Social-Emotional and Behavioral Screeners for Elementary or Secondary Schools
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When integrated into treatment planning protocols, data-informed decision-making has been shown to improve outcomes by allowing helping professionals to identify what may be working or not working within the interventions and supports provided.
“When integrated into treatment planning protocols, this type of data‐informed decision‐making has been shown to improve outcomes by allowing helping professionals to identify what may be working (or not working) within the interventions and supports provided (Jenkins et al., 2014).”
From Strategies for monitoring mentoring relationship quality to predict early program dropout (2022) · cites this paper as Jenkins et al., 2014
Cites
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908 · see citing works
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x · Cited by 8,746 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many schools recognize the importance of universal screening because studies have found that universal screening facilitates early identification and intervention of social, emotional, and academic problems because difficulties can be addressed before escalating to the point that a teacher or parent referral is necess…”
BackgroundStrengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Dimensional Measure of Child Mental Health
Goodman, A., & Goodman, R. (2009) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e3181985068 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales–21 With U.S. Adolescents: An Alternate Models Analysis
Moore, S. A., Dowdy, E., & Furlong, M. J. (2017) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282916651537 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Strategies for monitoring mentoring relationship quality to predict early program dropout
Lyons, M. D., & Edwards, K. D. (2022) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12585 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Conducting Universal Complete Mental Health Screening via Student Self-Report
Moore, S., Widales-Benitez, O., Carnazzo, K. W., Kim, E., Moffa, K., & Dowdy, E. (2015) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-015-0062-x
- Authors
- Jenkins, L. N., Demaray, M. K., Wren, N. S., Secord, S. M., Lyell, K. M., Magers, A. M., Setmeyer, A. J., Rodelo, C., Newcomb-McNeal, E., & Tennant, J.
- Affiliations
- Eastern Illinois University (US)
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jenkins, Lyndsay N.
- Venue
- Contemporary School Psychology
- Published
- 2014-08-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 241-254
- ISSN
- 2159-2020 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-1505
- OpenAlex
- W2058037521
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Contemporary School Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- behavioral screening, universal screening, classroom assessment, Social Skills Improvement System, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, psychometric properties, normative sample, score interpretation, elementary and secondary schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review