Cited by 4Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPsychology and Mental Health

Introduction to the special issue on clinical psychology and behavioral science: Processes, principles, and analytic strategies

Open access
Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne, Barnes-Holmes, Dermot, McEnteggart, Ciara, Dougher, Michael J., Luciano, Carmen·2020·The Psychological Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40732-020-00444-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current clinical behavior analysis literature is quite unclear about what defines a process.

    “The modern literature on clinical behavior analysis is fairly confusing on what constitutes a process.”

    From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Barnes-Holmes et al., 2020

  • Published works have described process variously as psychological change occurring without reference to its causes, as changes following predictable sequences toward an outcome, and more broadly as the therapist-client interaction and changes over time.

    “It has been referred to as any psychological change that occurs without reference to its causes(Barnes-Holmes et al., 2020); changes that occur in predictable sequences towards an outcome(Hayes et al., 2019); and, more broadly, as the therapist-client interaction and subsequent changes over time(Orlinsky et al., 2015).”

    From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Barnes-Holmes et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Catania, A. C. (1979). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., McEnteggart, C., Dougher, M. J., & Luciano, C.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Almería (ES)
Venue
The Psychological Record
Published
2020-11-17
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
541-542
ISSN
  • 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-3452
OpenAlex
W3100925292
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
clinical psychology, behavioral science, applied behavior analysis, clinical behavior analysis, psychotherapy, developmental disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review