Cited by 7Robotic Locomotion and ControlRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems

A novel kinematics and statics correction algorithm of semi-cylindrical foot end structure for 3-DOF LHDS of legged robots

Open access
Ba, Kai-xian, Song, Yan-he, Wang, Chun-yu, Shi, Ya-peng, Yu, Bin, Chen, Xin, Ma, Guo-liang, Kong, Xiang-dong·2022·Complex & Intelligent Systems

Abstract

In this paper, aiming at the problem that the ideal modeling point of the foot end deviates from the actual contact point due to the rolling effect of the semi-cylindrical foot end in leg hydraulics drive system (LHDS), a novel and relatively simple kinematics and statics correction algorithm is proposed. This algorithm can effectively improve the accuracy of LHDS kinematics and statics, and it is still applicable when the body and the contact surface are at different angles. Firstly, this paper deduces the kinematics and statics when the foot end of LHDS is regarded as the point foot, analyzes and calculates the deviation under common working conditions. Secondly, in view of this phenomenon, a kinematics correction algorithm based on virtual DOF and a statics correction algorithm based on translation theorem of forces are proposed respectively. Finally, the proposed algorithm is verified by LHDS performance test platform under various working conditions. The results show that after applying the kinematics correction algorithm, the trajectory deviation reduction rate of the hip joint is over 65%; after applying the statics correction algorithm, the deviation reduction rate of foot end contact force is over 43%. The related research results can be applied to any similar foot end, which has engineering application value.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40747-022-00748-z

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yuan X, Wang W, Zhu X et al (2022) Theory model of dynamic bulk modulus of aerated hydraulic fluid. Chin J Mech Eng-en. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00735-y · DOI
  2. Chen W, Ren G et al (2014) An adaptive locomotion controller for a hexapod robot: CPG, kinematics and force feedback[J]. Sci China (Information Sciences) 11(57):223-240

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ba, K.-X., Song, Y.-H., Wang, C.-Y., Shi, Y.-P., Yu, B., Chen, X., Ma, G.-L., & Kong, X.-D.
Affiliations
Yanshan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Bin
Venue
Complex & Intelligent Systems
Published
2022-05-23
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
5387-5407
ISSN
  • 2198-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-4536
OpenAlex
W4281383211
Cited by
7
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Complex & Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51905465, 52122503)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Keywords
legged robots, static correction, contact force, trajectory deviation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review