Cited by 23Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Data Classification

A distribution information sharing federated learning approach for medical image data

Open access
Zhao, Leiyang, Huang, Jianjun·2023·Complex & Intelligent Systems

Abstract

In recent years, federated learning has been believed to play a considerable role in cross-silo scenarios (e.g., medical institutions) due to its privacy-preserving properties. However, the non-IID problem in federated learning between medical institutions is common, which degrades the performance of traditional federated learning algorithms. To overcome the performance degradation problem, a novelty distribution information sharing federated learning approach (FedDIS) to medical image classification is proposed that reduce non-IIDness across clients by generating data locally at each client with shared medical image data distribution from others while protecting patient privacy. First, a variational autoencoder (VAE) is federally trained, of which the encoder is uesd to map the local original medical images into a hidden space, and the distribution information of the mapped data in the hidden space is estimated and then shared among the clients. Second, the clients augment a new set of image data based on the received distribution information with the decoder of VAE. Finally, the clients use the local dataset along with the augmented dataset to train the final classification model in a federated learning manner. Experiments on the diagnosis task of Alzheimer’s disease MRI dataset and the MNIST data classification task show that the proposed method can significantly improve the performance of federated learning under non-IID cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40747-023-01035-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Federated learning presents a viable solution for leveraging multimodal data from multiple health care institutions without the need to share the actual data, thus maintaining patient privacy.

    “In addition, federated learning presents a viable solution for leveraging multimodal data from multiple health care institutions without the need to share the actual data, thus maintaining patient privacy [152-156].”

    From Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook. (2024) · cites this paper as [152]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says federated learning can train a model across medical institutions without local data leaving them, addressing patient privacy. The paper studies medical images, however, and does not establish the claim about leveraging multimodal health-care data; its Conclusion treats heterogeneous images from different institutions as future work. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Zhang C, Li S, Xia J, Wang W, Yan F, Liu Y (2020) BatchCrypt: Efficient homomorphic encryption for Cross-Silo federated learning. In 2020 USENIX annual technical conference (USENIX ATC 20), pp. 493-506
  2. [9]Karimireddy SP, Kale S, Mohri M, Reddi S, Stich S, Suresh AT (2020) Scaffold: stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning. In: International conference on machine learning, pp 5132–5143
  3. [13]Lin T Kong L Stich SU Jaggi M Ensemble distillation for robust model fusion in federated learning Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2020 33 2351 2363
  4. [18]Wang L Xu S Wang X Zhu Q Addressing class imbalance in federated learning Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 2021 35 11 10165 10173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, L., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jianjun
Venue
Complex & Intelligent Systems
Published
2023-03-29
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
5625-5636
ISSN
  • 2198-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-4536
OpenAlex
W4361289277
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Complex & Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen Municipality (20200821152629001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
federated learning, non-IID data, medical image classification, variational autoencoder, data augmentation, cross-silo federated learning, patient privacy, MNIST

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review