Blockchain-Federated-Learning and Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Detection Using CT Imaging
Open accessAbstract
With the increase of COVID-19 cases worldwide, an effective way is required to diagnose COVID-19 patients. The primary problem in diagnosing COVID-19 patients is the shortage and reliability of testing kits, due to the quick spread of the virus, medical practitioners are facing difficulty in identifying the positive cases. The second real-world problem is to share the data among the hospitals globally while keeping in view the privacy concerns of the organizations. Building a collaborative model and preserving privacy are the major concerns for training a global deep learning model. This paper proposes a framework that collects a small amount of data from different sources (various hospitals) and trains a global deep learning model using blockchain-based federated learning. Blockchain technology authenticates the data and federated learning trains the model globally while preserving the privacy of the organization. First, we propose a data normalization technique that deals with the heterogeneity of data as the data is gathered from different hospitals having different kinds of Computed Tomography (CT) scanners. Secondly, we use Capsule Network-based segmentation and classification to detect COVID-19 patients. Thirdly, we design a method that can collaboratively train a global model using blockchain technology with federated learning while preserving privacy. Additionally, we collected real-life COVID-19 patients' data open to the research community. The proposed framework can utilize up-to-date data which improves the recognition of CT images. Finally, we conducted comprehensive experiments to validate the proposed method. Our results demonstrate better performance for detecting COVID-19 patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A third-party platform used for data processing and storage can access the data and may infer private information.
“Moreover, a thirdparty platform is used for data processing and storage, which can access the data and may infer private information [46].”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Simulations from 34,006 CT scan slices of 89 subjects verify high COVID-19 X-ray image classification and low data loss in the FL algorithm running.
“Simulations from 34,006 CT scan slices (images) of 89 subjects verify a high COVID-19 X-ray image classification and low data loss in the FL algorithm running.”
From Blockchain and AI-Based Solutions to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Like Epidemics: A Survey (2021) · cites this paper as [136]
Blockchain-based FL replaces the central authority with a specially designed decentralized privacy protocol.
“The main advantage brought is the replacement of the central authority with a specially designed decentralized privacy protocol.”
From Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
Deployment of FL on blockchain technology can establish data security and eliminate trust issues.
“Another approach to establish data security and eliminate the trust issues is the deployment of FL on blockchain technology [71]- [73].”
From Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
Simulations from 34,006 CT scan slices of 89 subjects verify a high COVID-19 X-ray image classification and low data loss in the FL algorithm.
“Simulations from 34,006 CT scan slices (images) of 89 subjects verify a high COVID-19 X-ray image classification and low data loss in the FL algorithm running.”
From Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [112]
In COVID-19 pandemic, FL is particularly useful to support COVID-19 diagnosis and detection by coordinating massive hospitals to build a common AI model.
“In the COVID-19 pandemic with growing privacy concerns, FL is particularly useful to support COVID-19 diagnosis and detection, by coordinating massive hospitals to build a common AI model [112].”
From Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [112]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [31]31. Khan A. A., Shafiq S., Kumar R., Kumar J., and Haq A. U., “H3DNN: 3D deep learning based detection of COVID-19 virus using lungs computed tomography,” in Proc. 17th Int. Comput. Conf. Wavelet Act. Media Technol. Inf. Process. (ICCWAMTIP), 2020, pp. 183–186.
- [33]33. Sabour S., Frosst N., and Hinton G. E., “Dynamic routing between capsules,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Annu. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Long Beach, CA, USA, Dec. 2017, pp. 3856–3866.
- [39]39. Simonyan K. and Zisserman A., “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), Bengio Y. and LeCun Y., Eds., San Diego, CA, USA, May 2015. [Online]. Available: https://iclr.cc
- [50]50. Zheng C.et al., “Deep learning-based detection for covid-19 from chest ct using weak label,” medRxiv, 2020.
- Authors
- Kumar, R., Khan, A. A., Kumar, J., Zakria, Golilarz, N. A., Zhang, S., Ting, Y., Zheng, C., & Wang, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Sichuan University (CN)
- China Telecom (CN)
- Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Wenyong
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2021-07-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 16301-16314
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- 2379-9153
- OpenAlex
- W3041100787
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- export.arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2033212)
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Y03019023601016201)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- COVID-19 detection, blockchain-based federated learning, computed tomography, capsule networks, medical image segmentation, data privacy, data normalization, collaborative deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review