The New Anticipatory Governance Culture for Innovation: Regulatory Foresight, Regulatory Experimentation and Regulatory Learning
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid pace of technological innovation, traditional methods of policy formation and legislating are becoming conspicuously anachronistic. The need for regulatory choices to be made to counter the deadening effect of regulatory lag is more important to developing markets and fostering growth than achieving one-off regulatory perfection. This article advances scholarship on innovation policy and the regulation of technological innovation in the European Union. It does so by considering what building an agile yet robust anticipatory governance regulatory culture involves. It systematically excavates a variety of tools and elements that are being put to use in inventive ways and argues that these need to be more cohesively and systemically integrated into jurisdictions’ regulatory toolbox. Approaches covered include strategic foresight, the critical embrace of iterative policy development and regulatory learning in the face of uncertainty, and the embrace of bottom-up approaches to co-creation of policy such as policy labs and the testing and regulatory learning through pilot regulation and experimentation. The growing use of regulatory sandboxes as an EU policy tool to boost innovation and navigate regulatory complexity, as seen in the EU AI Act, is also probed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Artificial intelligence is rapidly outpacing traditional legal and institutional frameworks, creating regulatory lag and diminishing the effectiveness of conventional governance mechanisms.
“The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly outpaces the capacity of traditional legal and institutional frameworks, creating regulatory lag and diminishing the effectiveness of conventional governance mechanisms (Dixon 2023; Ahern 2025).”
From Bridging Liability Gaps in the Age of AI: The Case for No-Fault Compensation Schemes (2025) · cites this paper as Ahern 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Social Control of Technology
Mayne, A. J. (1982) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2634327 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Ahern D (2021) Regulatory lag, regulatory friction and regulatory transition as FinTech disenablers: cali- brating an EU response to the regulatory sandbox phenomenon. EBOR 22:395-432. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40804-021-00217 · DOI
- Stylianou K, Iacovides M, Lundqvist B (eds) Fin- tech competition: law, policy and market organisation. Bloomsbury-Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 307-330
- Avgouleas E, Seretakis A (2023) How should crypto lending be regulated under EU law? EBOR 23:421- 438. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40804-023-00293-3 · DOI
- Bailey J, Hinrichs-Krapels S, Pollitt A, Duffy B (2019) Policy and innovation lab landscape review. Tech- nical Internal Document. The Policy Institute, King's College London
- Baldwin R (2010) Better regulation: the search and the struggle. In: Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M (eds) The Oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 259-278
- Bolton M, Mintrom M (2023) RegTech and creating public value: opportunities and challenges. Policy des Pract 6:266-282. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 25741 292. 2023. 22130 59 · DOI
- Braithwaite J (2005) Markets in vice, markets in virtue. Oxford and Federation Press, New York and Sydney
- Buocz T, Pfotenhauer S, Eisenberger I (2023) Regulatory sandboxes in the AI Act: reconciling innovation and safety? Law Innov Technol 15:357-389. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 17579 961. 2023. 22456 · DOI
- Cagnin C, Havas A, Saritas O (2013) Future-oriented technology analysis: its potential to address disrup- tive transformations. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80:379-385. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. techf ore. 2012. 10. 001 · DOI
- Carrez D, Rupp M (2023) A thriving bioeconomy needs better tools for measuring and monitoring. Euro- Choices 22:51-55. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1746-692X. 12411 · DOI
- Stylianou K, Iacovides M, Lundqvist B (eds) Fintech competition: law, policy and market organisation. Bloomsbury-Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 25-46
- Dolar B, Dale B (2020) The Dodd-Frank Act's non-uniform regulatory impact on the banking industry. J Bank Regul 21:188-195. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41261-019-00106-z · DOI
- Drahos P, Krygier M (2017) Regulations, institutions and networks. In: Drahos P (ed) Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 1-22
- ElZarrad MK, Lee AY, Purcell R, Steele SJ (2022) Advancing an agile regulatory ecosystem to respond to the rapid development of innovative technologies. Clin Transl Sci 15:1332-1339. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ cts. 13267 · DOI
- Enria A (2023) Regulating crypto finance: taking stock and looking ahead. Speech by the Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB, Venice, 14 November 2023. https:// www. banki ngsup ervis ion. europa. eu/ press/ speec hes/ date/ 2023/ html/ ssm. sp231 114~fd1b2 cc234. en. html European Commission (2017) Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee: A balanced IP enforcement system responding to today's societal challenges. COM(2017) 707 final. https:// ec. europa. eu/ docsr oom/ docum ents/ 26581. Accessed 12 March 2024 European Commission (2018a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Com- mittee of the Regions: FinTech Action Plan: for a more competitive and innovative European finan- cial sector. COM/2018.0109 European Commission (2018b) Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies for SMEs (INNOSUP-03-2018) European Commission (2020)
- Fenwick M, Vermeulen EPM (2020) Fintech, overcoming friction and new models of regulation. In: Fen- wick M, Van Uytsel S, Ying B (eds) Regulating FinTech in Asia. Perspectives in law, business and innovation. Springer, Singapore, pp 205-225
- Ferreira A, Sandner P (2021) EU search for regulatory answer to crypto assets and their place in the financial markets' infrastructure. Comput Law Secur Rev 43(105632):1-15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. clsr. 2021. 105632 · DOI
- Fuerth LS (2009) Foresight and anticipatory governance. Foresight 11:14-32. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ 14636 68091 09824 12 · DOI
- Gerrans P, Baur DG, Lavagna-Slater S (2022) Fintech and responsibility: buy-now-pay-later arrange- ments. Aust J Manag 47:474-502. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 03128 96221 10324 48 · DOI
- Gluckman PD, Bardsley A, Kaiser M (2021) Brokerage at the science-policy interface: from conceptual framework to practical guidance. Hum Social Sci Commun 8(84):1-10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41599-021-00756-3 · DOI
- Gofen A, Golan E (2020) Laboratories of design: a catalog of policy innovation labs in Europe. Hebrew Univ Jerusalem. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 38228 21 · DOI
- Grabosky P (2017) Meta-regulation. In: Drahos P (ed) Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 149-153
- Guston DH (2014) Understanding 'anticipatory governance.' Soc Stud Sci 44:218-242. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 03063 12713 508669 · DOI
- Haines F (2017) Regulation and risk. In: Drahos P (ed) Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 181-196
- Hebinck A, Vervoort JM, Hebinck P, Rutting L, Galli F (2018) Imagining transformative futures: partici- patory foresight for food systems change. Ecol Soc 23:2. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5751/ ES-10054-230216 · DOI
- Hinrichs-Krapels S, Bailey J, Boulding H, Duffy B, Hesketh R, Kinloch E, Pollitt A, Rawlings S, van Rij A, Wilkinson B, Pow R, Grant G (2020) Using policy labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach. Palgrave Commun 6:101. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41599-020-0453-0 Joint Research Council (2022) JRC Strategy 2030. https:// joint-resea rch-centre. ec. europa. eu/ system/ files/ 2022-12/ JRC% 20Str ategy% 202030. pdf. Accessed 12 March 2024 · DOI
- Kimbell L, Bailey J (2017) Prototyping and the new spirit of policy-making. CoDesign 13:214-226. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 15710 882. 2017. 13550 03 · DOI
- Lauber K, Brooks E (2023) Why meta-regulation matters for public health: the case of the EU better regulation agenda. Glob Health 19:1-70. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12992-023-00971-4 · DOI
- Lee C, Ling M (2020) The role of policy labs in policy experiment and knowledge transfer: a comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore. J Comp Policy Anal 22:281-329. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13876 988. 2019. 16686 57 · DOI
- Macnaghten P (2021) Towards an anticipatory public engagement methodology: deliberative experiments in the assembly of possible worlds using focus groups. Qual Res 21:3-19. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14687 94120 919096 · DOI
- Maume P (2023) The Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCAR): landmark codification, or first step of many, or both? ECFR 2:243-275. https:// doiorg. eui. idm. oclc. org/ 10. 1515/ ecfr-2023-0014 · DOI
- McGann M, Blomkamp E, Lewis JM (2018) The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sci 51:249-267. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11077-018-9315-7 · DOI
- Micheler E, Whaley A (2020) Regulatory technology: replacing law with computer code. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 21:349-377. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40804-019-00151-1 · DOI
- Miglionico A (2022) Regulating innovation through digital platforms: the sandbox tool. ECFR 19:828- 853. https:// doi. org. eui. idm. oclc. org/ 10. 1515/ ecfr-2022-0029 · DOI
- Muiderman K, Gupta A, Vervoot J, Biermann F (2020) Four approaches to anticipatory climate govern- ance: different conceptions of the future and implications for the present. WIRE's Climate Change e673:1-20. https:// wires. onlin elibr ary. wiley. com/ doi/ pdf/ 10. 1002/ wcc. 673 · DOI
- Ojha H, Maheshwari B, Bhattarai B (2021) Co-creating knowledge, policy and practice: a call to advance water policy lab process. World Water Policy 7:132-142. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ wwp2. 12050 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019) Strategic foresight for better policies: building effective governance in the face of uncertain futures. https:// www. oecd. org/ strat egic-fores ight/ ourwo rk/ Strat egic% 20For esight% 20for% 20Bet ter% 20Pol icies. pdf. Accessed 12 March 2024 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020) Regulatory policy in the Slovak Republic: towards future-proof regulation. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1787/ ce95a 880-en Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021a) Foresight and anticipatory govern- ance in practice: lessons in effective foresight institutionalisation. Strategic Foresight Office, Office of the Secretary General. https:// www. oecd. org/ strat egic-fores ight/ ourwo rk/ Fores ight_ and_ Antic ipato ry_ Gover nance. pdf. Accessed 12 March 2024 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021b) Overcoming exclusion in digital economies. In: Development Co-operation Report 2021: Shaping a Just Digital Transformation. OECD, p 265 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2023) What is strategic foresight? https:// www. oecd. org/ strat egic-fores ight/. Accessed 12 March 2024 · DOI
- Parker C, Braithwaite J (2003) Regulation. In: Cane P, Tushnet M (eds) The Oxford handbook of legal studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Pollman E (2019) Tech, regulatory arbitrage and limits. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 20:567-590. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40804-019-00155-x · DOI
- Pólova A, Nascimento S (2021) Foresight and design fictions meet at a policy lab: an experimentation approach in public sector innovation. Futures 128:102709. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. futur es. 2021. 102709 · DOI
- Ranchordás S (2021) Experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes-law without order? Law Method. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5553/ REM/. 000064 · DOI
- Rübig P (2012) The changing face of risk governance: moving from precaution to smarter regulation. Eur J Risk Regul 3:145-146. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S1867 299X0 00019 75 · DOI
- Soeteman-Hernández LG, Sutcliffe HR, Sluijters T, van Guens J, Noorlander CW, Sips AJAM (2021) Modernizing innovation governance to meet policy ambitions through trusted environments. Nano- Impact 21:100301. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. impact. 2021. 100301 · DOI
- Strengers Y, Dahlgren K, Pink S, Sadowski J, Nicholls L (2022) Digital technology and energy imagi- naries of future home life: comic-strip scenarios as a method to disrupt energy industry futures. Energy Res Soc Sci 84:102366. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. erss. 2021. 102366 · DOI
- Teubner G (1998) Juridification: concepts, aspects, limits, solutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Tõnurist P, Hanson A (2020) Anticipatory innovation governance: shaping the future through proactive policy making. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 44. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1787/ cce14 d80-en · DOI
- Topp L, Mair D, Smillie L, Cairney P (2018) Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. Palgrave Commun 4:87. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41599-018-0143-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bridging Liability Gaps in the Age of AI: The Case for No-Fault Compensation Schemes
Tran, H.-C. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v8i3.36797 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ahern, D.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Ahern, Deirdre
- ORCID
- Ahern, Deirdre
- Venue
- European Business Organization Law Review
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-283
- ISSN
- 1566-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6205
- OpenAlex
- W4409154693
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 16
- FWCI
- 44.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Business Organization Law Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Dublin, Trinity College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- anticipatory governance, regulatory experimentation, regulatory learning, innovation policy, regulatory lag, policy co-creation, policy labs, regulatory sandboxes, EU AI Act, European Union regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review