The DOI matches its Crossref record; 214 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media Ills and Evolutionary Mismatches: A Conceptual Framework
Open accessAbstract
From the erosion of mental well-being through incessant comparison, unrealistic portrayals, and addiction, the negative effects of social media are well-documented. However, it is necessary to move beyond the simplistic characterizations of social media as inherently either beneficial or detrimental and, instead, underscore the nuanced mechanisms that underlie its adverse outcomes. To this end, this paper delineates a conceptual framework grounded in evolutionary psychology, designed to explain the prevalent negative repercussions often linked to the utilization of social media. Specifically, we argue that these “social media ills” are manifestations of evolutionary mismatches between social media features and our evolved mechanism designed for social living. We start by reviewing how our psychological mechanisms—sociometer, social monitoring system, and social comparison—facilitate living within complex social situations and fulfill our fundamental need to belong. We then identify features of social media that may hijack these processes to produce the consequences we observe today. We have also recommended several evolutionarily informed directions policymakers and social media companies can undertake to treat social media ills at their root cause. This article concludes by discussing the theoretical implications and interventions the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis provides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, our findings are in line with the mismatch hypothesis (Lim and Tan, 2024), which suggests that SNSs hijack our evolved social comparisons mechanisms by offering (too) abundant opportunities for upward comparisons.”
From The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health (2025) · cites this paper as Lim and Tan, 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–214 of 214
Evolutionary psychology’s next challenge: Solving modern problems using a mismatch perspective.
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., & van Vugt, M. (2020) · Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1037/ebs0000207 · Cited by 26 · cited 3×
“…of evolved psychological mechanisms and the role of evolutionary mismatch—particularly, mismatches inducing negative consequences or costs to individuals and society—may be able to lead to more informed problem-solving and public policy (Griskevicius et al., 2012; Li et al., 2018, 2020).”
The Adaptive Functions of Jealousy
Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77619-4_7 · Cited by 21 · cited 2×
“Consequently, social information held substantial relevance and importance due to the intimate size of the village community (Yong & Li, 2018).”
why the less intelligent may enjoy television more than the more intelligent
Satoshi Kanazawa, A. (2006) · Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1556/jcep.4.2006.1.2 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“Individuals who were less intelligent faced greater difficulty in distinguishing television characters from real friends (Kanazawa, 2002, 2006).”
The Evolution of Feminine Beauty
Bovet, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_17 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“What is considered beautiful is likely highly heterogeneous and dependent on the specific advantages conferred upon those who possess the traits across a multitude of human ecology (Bovet, 2018).”
Working, scrolling, and worrying: Doomscrolling at work and its implications for work engagement
Hughes, I. M., Keith, M. G., Lee, J., & Gray, C. E. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108130 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“This input can overload our evolutionarily endowed cognitive system, generating undue stress and decreased work productivity (Hughes et al., 2024).”
Lim, A. J., Lau, C., & Li, N. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734206 · Cited by 12 · cited 2×
“For instance, while social media usage is often linked to declines in self-esteem, recent research findings indicate that this may not hold true, particularly when individuals have social media networks of evolutionarily novel sizes, such as 500 friends (Lim et al., 2021).”
Self-citation11. Face-to-face communication and body language
Antos, G., Ventola, E., & Weber, T. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9783110211399.2.285 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“This is evident by the complex layering of evolved communication systems that facilitate face-to-face interaction in various domains of life (Thibault, 2008, p. 292).”
“She liked the picture so i think she liked it”. Unpacking the social practice of liking
Jungselius, B. (2019) · Netcom · doi:10.4000/netcom.3849 · Cited by 8 · cited 2×
“People may give “Likes” for several reasons and interpret “Likes” in various ways rather than as actual appreciation of the content (Jungselius, 2019).”
Trials and Tribulations of Childhood: An Evolutionary Perspective
Periss, V., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2011) · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396690.013.0010 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“…that promote self-efficacy and social skills, we may be able to restore formative environments that more closely reflect those of our evolutionary history, which facilitates the development and acquisition of socially, ecologically, and culturally relevant skills (see Periss & Bjorklund, 2011).”
Bolstering biculturals: Self-affirmation reduces contrastive responses to identity primes
Liu, Z., Brockner, J., & Morris, M. W. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104150 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“FOMO has been linked to activating the right middle temporal gyrus, a brain region associated with processing social inclusion signals (Liu et al., 2021).”
Nass, C., & Reeves, B. B. (1997) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1120212.1120338 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“Computer-mediated virtual social interactions increasingly resemble in-person interactions (Bailenson, 2018; Nass & Reeves, 1997).”
Curato, N., Hammond, M., & Min, J. B. (2018) · Political philosophy and public purpose · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95534-6_2 · Cited by 1
Satoshi Kanazawa, A., Li, N. P., & Yong, J. C. (2022) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12709 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“For instance, intelligence has been recognized as a factor underlying responses to evolutionarily novel stimuli (e.g., Kanazawa & Hellberg, 2010; Kanazawa et al., 2022).”
Analysis of Wealth-flaunting Chinese Teenagers
Chen, X. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (MHEHD 2022) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220704.068 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“Due to high social interconnectivity on social media, people are frequently exposed to the presence of ultra-high-net-worth individuals (Michaelidou et al., 2021) and their pretenders, who often flaunt their wealth on social media (Chen, 2022).”
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Aronson, E. (1999). The social animal (8th ed). Worth Publishers.
- Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do (p. 290). W. W. Norton & Company.
- Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · DOI · Paper page
- Brewer, M. B., & Caporael, L. R. (2006). An evolutionary perspective on social identity: Revisiting groups. In Evolution and social psychology (pp. 143–161). Psychosocial Press.
- Buunk, B. P., & Brenninkmeyer, V. (2000). Social comparison processes among depressed individuals: Evidence for the evolutionary perspective on involuntary subordinate strategies? Routledge.
- Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (Eds.). (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (pp. xiv, 413). Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
- Faulhaber, M. E., Lee, J. E., & Gentile, D. A. (2023). The effect of self-monitoring limited social media use on psychological well-being. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 4(2: Summer 2023). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000111 · DOI
- Giphart, R., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Mismatch: How Our Stone Age Brain Deceives Us Every Day (And What We Can Do About It). Hachette UK.
- Gluckman, P. D., & Hanson, M. A. (2006). Mismatch: Why our world no longer fits our bodies. Oxford University Press.
- Lipsman, A., Mudd, G., Rich, M., & Bruich, S. (2012). The power of “Like”: How brands reach (and influence) fans through social-media marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-1-040-052 · DOI
- Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972). Man and woman, boy and girl: Differentiation and dimorphism of gender identity from conception to maturity (pp. xiv, 311). Johns Hopkins U. Press.
- Ouwerkerk, J. W., Kerr, N. L., Gallucci, M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2005). Avoiding the social death penalty: Ostracism and cooperation in social dilemmas. In The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 321–332). Psychology Press.
- Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion. In The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Psychology Press.
- Rasmussen, L. (2018). Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 1.
- Rogers, A. R., & Jorde, L. B. (1995). Genetic evidence on modern human origins. Human Biology, 67(1), 1–36.
- Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection—Visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(1), 1. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4218
- Todres, J. (2023). Confronting Categorical Exclusions Based on Age: The Rights of Children and Youth (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4658872). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4658872
- Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man (pp. 119–143). Oxford University Press.
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health
Le Blanc-Brillon, J., Fortin, J.-S., Lafrance, L., & Hétu, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1597241 · Cited by 16
“Indeed, our findings are in line with the mismatch hypothesis (Lim and Tan, 2024), which suggests that SNSs hijack our evolved social comparisons mechanisms by offering (too) abundant opportunities for upward comparisons.”
Breathwork for Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Does Choosing a Specific Technique Matter?
Siebieszuk, A., Płoński, A. F., & Baranowski, M. (2025) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci13030127 · Cited by 12
The people’s game: evolutionary perspectives on the behavioural neuroscience of football fandom
Butler, M., Brar, G., Abed, R., & O'Connell, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1517295 · Cited by 9
Mayen, S., & Camerini, A.-L. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251391731 · Cited by 5
“…addictive use (Cai et al., 2023), interference with sleep (Brautsch et al., 2023), evolutionary mismatches resulting from biased social cues (Lim and Tan, 2024), and exposure to online risks such as hate speech (Bührer et al., 2024), sexting (Mori et al., 2019), or self-harm-related…”
Shu, B., Dong, Z., Su, F., & Zheng, W. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1554882 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, A. J., & Tan, E.
- Affiliations
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Singapore Management University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, Amy J.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Psychological Science
- Published
- 2024-07-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 212-235
- ISSN
- 2198-9885 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400566489
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 249
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evolutionary Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Murdoch University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- evolutionary mismatch, evolutionary psychology, social comparison, need to belong, social media addiction, social media design, psychological well-being, conceptual framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review