Cited by 7Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Evaluating the Convergent and Divergent Validity of the Children’s Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire (CPFQ) among Children with Autism

Bachmann, Karlee, Hinman, Jessica M., Yi, Zhihui, Dixon, Mark R.·2021·Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41252-021-00206-w

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The issue with measures like the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire has been discussed in other articles, indicating the importance of re-evaluating measures in future studies.

    “The issue with measures, like the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, has also been discussed in other articles, lending to the importance of re-evaluating measures used in future studies (Bachmann et al., 2021).”

    From A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Bachmann et al., 2021

  • The AAQ is limited in scope because it only measures processes related to experiential avoidance.

    “the AAQ is limited in scope, as it only measures processes related to experiential avoidance (Bachmann et al., 2021).”

    From A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Bachmann et al., 2021

  • The AAQ measure may not predict the most important outcomes for students in higher education.

    “the AAQ measure may not predict the most important outcomes for students in higher education”

    From A Scoping Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as Bachmann et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachmann, K., Hinman, J. M., Yi, Z., & Dixon, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Dixon, Mark R.
Venue
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Published
2021-06-12
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
298-303
ISSN
  • 2366-7532 (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-7540
OpenAlex
W3168735721
Cited by
7
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Autism Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
psychological flexibility, autism spectrum disorder, convergent validity, discriminant validity, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, mindfulness, self-report measures, acceptance and commitment therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review