Cited by 5Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCounseling Practices and SupervisionCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Column on Telebehavioral Health Education, Training, and Competency Development: Current and Future Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open access
Drude, Kenneth P.·2021·Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has resulted in many worldwide rapid and major changes in how behavioral health education, training, supervision, and service delivery are being done and will have significant long-term implications for the future of telebehavioral health (TBH). Mandates for social distancing during the pandemic necessitated urgently changing from in-person forms of education, training, supervision, and service delivery to uses of telecommunications, often with minimal preparation. This column on telebehavioral health education, training, supervision, and competencies presents some examples of how organizations, programs, and practitioners generally successfully adapted and responded to these sudden circumstances. How some of the major barriers to the adoption of telebehavioral services in the USA were quickly changed, and considerations for the future education, training, and service delivery of telebehavioral health are identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41347-021-00219-1

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Telemedicine Association. (2020). ATA applauds Bipartisan House Telehealth Caucus Champions for introducing the protecting access to Post-COVID-19 Telehealth Act to permanently expand use of telehealth. https://www.americantelemed.org/press-releases/ata-applauds-bipartisan-housetelehealth-caucus-champions-for-introducing-the-protecting-access-to-post-covid-19-telehealth-act-to-permanently-expand-use-of-telehealth/
  2. Velázquez, P., Gupta, G., Gupte, G., Carson, N. & Venter, J. (2020). Rapid implementation of telepsychiatry in a safety-net health system during Covid-19 using Lean. NEJM Catalyst. 10.1056/CAT.20.0319NEJM · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drude, K. P.
Corresponding author
Drude, Kenneth P.
Venue
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
561-566
ISSN
2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178208901
Cited by
5
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
telebehavioral health, professional training, clinical supervision, competence development, COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing, telehealth adoption barriers, organizational adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review