Cited by 31Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health InterventionsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Overcoming Clinician Technophobia: What We Learned from Our Mass Exposure to Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open access
Sherrill, Andrew M., Wiese, Christopher W., Abdullah, Saeed, Arriaga, Rosa I.·2022·Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Abstract

Mental health clinicians have migrated to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and have reported their use of telehealth may be permanent. Understanding how stakeholders overcame hesitancy regarding the use of telehealth can potentially reveal how stakeholders can adopt future clinical technologies. The exposure therapy conceptual framework provides one explanation of how mental health clinicians can face their concerns about technologies that promise to improve clinical outcomes and worker well-being. We review available literature published since the start of the pandemic on the extent to which clinicians migrated to telehealth and their reactions to their transitions. In particular, we review available literature that describes negative attitudes and worries by clinicians as one of many barriers of telehealth implementation. We introduce the perspective that the necessary transition to telehealth at the start of the pandemic functioned as an exposure exercise that changed many clinicians’ cognitive and emotional reactions to the use of telehealth technologies. Next, we provide guidance on how clinicians can continue taking an exposure approach to learning emerging technologies that are safe and can benefit all stakeholders. Clinicians can now reflect on how they overcame hesitancy regarding telehealth during the pandemic and identify how to build on that new learning by applying strategies used in exposure therapy. The future of clinical work will increasingly require mental health clinicians to better serve their patient populations and enhance their own well-being by overcoming technophobia, a broad term for any level of hesitancy, reluctance, skepticism, worry, anxiety, or fear of implementing technology. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41347-022-00273-3

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

19 of 36 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Some evidence suggests that when clinicians had to use telehealth, they experienced negative feelings including anxiety.

    “When faced with the necessity to use telehealth, some evidence suggests clinicians experienced negative feelings including anxiety (Doorn et al., 2021; Doran & Lawson, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Doorn et al., 2021 source
    • cites Doran & Lawson, 2021 source

      The Results (Technology and Preparedness; page unavailable) report that 62.5% of providers found the transition to telemental health at least somewhat stressful, citing the rapid transition, unfamiliar technology, and worry about provider–client rapport. The Discussion (page unavailable) also reports negative attitudes among a sizeable minority. These passages support negative feelings during the transition, but do not specifically report anxiety caused by having to use telehealth. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    A large international survey found that most mental health clinicians during the pandemic worried about technical problems, care quality, and crisis response.

    “A large international survey found the majority of mental health clinicians during the pandemic were concerned with technical issues, quality of care, and responding to crises (Montoya et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montoya et al., 2022 source
  • Premisecitation

    Evidence suggests that using telehealth more often increases comfort with it and preference for it.

    “Evidence suggests that frequency of telehealth use increases comfort with telehealth and preference to use telehealth (Connolly et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Connolly et al., 2020 source

      The Results section (‘Attitude variability related to extent of TMH-V experience’; page unavailable) reports increased provider comfort after use, while the Discussion reports greater acceptance among experienced providers than nonusers. The review does not establish that using telehealth more frequently increases comfort or a preference to use it; it describes a tentative relationship between experience and attitudes, specifically for telemental health by videoconferencing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Beyond external barriers, mental health clinicians hold beliefs, attitudes, and feelings about telehealth that can hinder its adoption.

    “However, in addition to external barriers, mental health clinicians report many beliefs, attitudes, and feelings about telehealth that may be inconducive for the adoption of these technologies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cowan et al., 2019 source
    • cites Langarizadeh et al., 2017 source
  • Premisecitation

    Most stakeholders, including patients, employers, organizations, and managed care, gave clinicians a grace period to adjust and learn during the rapid telehealth transition.

    “Most stakeholders — patients, employers, organizations, managed care — allowed clinicians a grace period to adjust their practices and learn (Puspitasari et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Puspitasari et al., 2021 source

      In “Behavioral Health Programs That Adopted and Implemented Teletherapy After COVID-19” (page unavailable), the paper says clinical workloads were temporarily reduced while clinicians adapted to new workflows, and that training and consultation were available. This supports an organizational adjustment period, but it does not say that most stakeholders—including patients, employers, and managed care—gave clinicians a grace period. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 10
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Another large survey found that about 28% of mental health clinicians had negative feelings about telehealth before the pandemic, and those feelings dropped significantly after they moved to telehealth.

    “Another large survey found about 28% of mental health clinicians had negative feelings about telehealth prior to the pandemic and that these feelings decreased significantly after migrating to telehealth (Doran & Lawson, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doran & Lawson, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Before the pandemic, clinicians often reported worries about technical competence, privacy, hassle, technical problems, and telehealth being impersonal and poor for alliance and nonverbal assessment.

    “Pre-pandemic, clinicians often reported concern about their technical competency, privacy, increased hassle, potential for technical issues, and the perception that telehealth is impersonal and inconducive to building therapeutic alliance and assessing nonverbals (Connolly et al., 2020; Pierce et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Connolly et al., 2020 source

      The Results (Overall attitudes toward TMH-V; page not provided) report concerns about technical problems, increased hassle, confidentiality, impersonal care, the therapeutic relationship, and difficulty detecting nonverbal cues. They also report a need for training and technical support, but do not clearly say clinicians worried about their own technical competence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Pierce et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health clinicians moved to telehealth, and some reported that their telehealth use might continue permanently.

    “Mental health clinicians have migrated to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and have reported their use of telehealth may be permanent (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020; Dores et al., 2020; Sammons et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020 source
    • cites Dores et al., 2020 source

      The Results (§3.2.1; page unavailable) report that 91 of 108 surveyed Portuguese psychologists continued sessions using digital technologies during lockdown, supporting the move to telehealth. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) notes favorable views of these technologies after the pandemic, but does not report clinicians saying their telehealth use might be permanent. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sammons et al., 2020 source

      The Results (page not provided) document a rapid shift to telepsychology among surveyed psychologists: 83% reported using it almost exclusively after the crisis began. Wrapping Up & Reflection (page not provided) says persistence after the crisis was unclear and expresses the authors’ belief that the shift could create lasting change; it does not report clinicians saying their own use might be permanent. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One study found that only 29% of clinical psychologists used telehealth for part of their caseload before the pandemic, but within weeks over 80% used it for nearly all their caseload.

    “One study found that only 29% of clinical psychologists used telehealth for a portion of their caseload prior to the pandemic and, within weeks of the pandemic, over 80% of the sample reported using telehealth for nearly their entire caseload (Sammons et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sammons et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Future clinical work will increasingly demand that mental health clinicians overcome technophobia to serve patients better and improve their own well-being.

    “The future of clinical work will increasingly require mental health clinicians to better serve their patient populations and enhance their own well-being by overcoming technophobia, a broad term for any level of hesitancy, reluctance, skepticism, worry, anxiety, or fear of implementing technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Telehealth has long been recognized as an effective way to deliver cognitive behavioral treatments.

    “Interestingly, however, telehealth has long been recognized as an effective modality for cognitive behavioral treatments (Batastini et al., 2021)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Batastini et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Successfully adopting clinical technologies could make the clinical workplace more productive and fulfilling by cutting routine work so clinicians can focus on meaningful tasks.

    “However, successful adoption of these technologies can potentially lead to a more productive and fulfilling clinical workplace by reducing routine work so that clinicians can focus on meaningful work activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One study found that mental health clinicians on average had moderate anxiety about using telehealth during the pandemic, and those without prior telehealth experience had higher anxiety.

    “One study found that, on average, mental health clinicians experienced a moderate level of anxiety about using telehealth during the pandemic and that those who had not previously used telehealth had higher levels of anxiety than those who had (Doorn et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doorn et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Technology will change the nature of work across all occupations, including mental health work.

    “Whether good or bad, technology will change the nature of work for all occupations — mental health work is no exception.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mental health clinicians may be especially prone to technophobia because psychotherapy training and practice have rarely used technology.

    “Importantly, mental health clinicians may be especially vulnerable to technophobia because the training and practice of psychotherapy has seldom leveraged technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Contemporary mental health clinicians report concerns that technology may glitch, carry biases, limit decision-making, and risk breaches of sensitive data.

    “While not as severe, these reactions echo the responses of contemporary mental health clinicians who report concerns such as if technology will glitch, have biases, limit decision-making, and risk breaches of sensitive data (McClure, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McClure, 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most new technologies will replace some labor, and historically this has provoked strong resistance such as strikes and sabotage.

    “For example, most new technologies will replace some labor, which has historically been met with stark resistance (e.g., striking against integration and sabotaging implementation; Carlopio, 1988).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carlopio, 1988 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Clinicians can keep using an exposure approach to learn emerging technologies that could change clinical practice and benefit all stakeholders.

    “Clinicians can continue taking an exposure approach to learning emerging technologies that have the potential to change the clinical landscape and benefit all stakeholders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A positive outcome amid the pandemic's tragedies has been major progress in realizing technology's potential to extend the reach of mental health treatment.

    “One silver lining to the tragedies of the pandemic has been a giant step forward in realizing the potential of technology to enhance the reach of mental health treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Unlike the global shift to telehealth, overcoming clinician technophobia about other future technologies will require proactive action.

    “Unlike the global transition to telehealth, we expect that overcoming clinician technophobia concerning integrating other future technologies will require proactive action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Clinicians and technologists will both gain from more interaction.

    “Clinicians and technologists will mutually benefit from further interaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many clinicians reported that repeated exposure to telehealth produced favorable impressions, and their remaining concerns were about system support such as reimbursement and licensure rather than the technology itself.

    “Many clinicians reported that consistent exposure to telehealth resulted in favorable impressions and that remaining concerns are not about the technology but the extent to which systems could support its continued use (e.g., differential reimbursement rates and licensure restrictions; Lipschitz et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lipschitz et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The COVID-19 pandemic pushed clinicians to overcome telehealth hesitancy, but technophobia may still block future technologies.

    “While the COVID-19 pandemic provided an impetus for clinicians to overcome telehealth hesitancy, technophobia may continue to obstruct future technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Exposure therapy strategies can offer proactive steps toward integrating technology.

    “In particular, strategies used in exposure therapy can provide proactive steps toward technological integration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although many barriers to adopting clinical technologies have long existed and some will remain, clinicians can now build on the insight that behavioral commitments and intentions to adapt can help them overcome their concerns and worries.

    “While many barriers to adopting clinical technologies have existed for many years and some barriers will continue to persist, clinicians can now build off the insight that they can indeed overcome their concerns and worries with behavioral commitments and intentions to adapt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The mental health workforce is ready for a fundamental transformation in which clinicians, trainers, and organizations adopt emerging technologies to improve efficacy, reach, and worker well-being.

    “The mental health workforce is primed for a fundamental transformation in which clinicians, trainers, and organizations embrace emerging technologies to increase efficacy, reach, and worker well-being.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Clinical guidelines based on the inhibitory learning model can be adapted to help clinicians manage their own discomforts.

    “However, clinical guidelines informed by this model (e.g., Maples-Keller et al., 2022) can be adapted to help clinicians address their own discomforts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maples-Keller et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Relying only on human-to-human interactions can restrict how far clinician training and patient access can scale.

    “However, relying solely on human-to-human interactions can limit the scalability of clinician training and patient access.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
23 of 23
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For many clinicians in March 2020, telehealth became the only available way to deliver treatment.

    “In March 2020, many clinicians learned that telehealth would be the only treatment delivery modality available.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mental health treatment has historically not depended on technology for learning or delivering evidence-based practice.

    “Historically, mental health treatment has not required technology in learning or delivering evidence-based practice.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mass transition to telehealth involved conditions that sufficiently resembled an exposure exercise to change clinicians' reactions.

    “These conditions provided the opportunity for informal exposure exercises that resulted in adaptive changes in behavior and perspectives.”
3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherrill, A. M., Wiese, C. W., Abdullah, S., & Arriaga, R. I.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sherrill, Andrew M.
Venue
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
547-553
ISSN
2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293778617
Cited by
31
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1915504)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
telemedicine, technophobia, COVID-19 pandemic, exposure therapy, technology adoption, mental health professionals, clinician well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review