Overcoming Clinician Technophobia: What We Learned from Our Mass Exposure to Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Mental health clinicians have migrated to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and have reported their use of telehealth may be permanent. Understanding how stakeholders overcame hesitancy regarding the use of telehealth can potentially reveal how stakeholders can adopt future clinical technologies. The exposure therapy conceptual framework provides one explanation of how mental health clinicians can face their concerns about technologies that promise to improve clinical outcomes and worker well-being. We review available literature published since the start of the pandemic on the extent to which clinicians migrated to telehealth and their reactions to their transitions. In particular, we review available literature that describes negative attitudes and worries by clinicians as one of many barriers of telehealth implementation. We introduce the perspective that the necessary transition to telehealth at the start of the pandemic functioned as an exposure exercise that changed many clinicians’ cognitive and emotional reactions to the use of telehealth technologies. Next, we provide guidance on how clinicians can continue taking an exposure approach to learning emerging technologies that are safe and can benefit all stakeholders. Clinicians can now reflect on how they overcame hesitancy regarding telehealth during the pandemic and identify how to build on that new learning by applying strategies used in exposure therapy. The future of clinical work will increasingly require mental health clinicians to better serve their patient populations and enhance their own well-being by overcoming technophobia, a broad term for any level of hesitancy, reluctance, skepticism, worry, anxiety, or fear of implementing technology. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
19 of 36 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Some evidence suggests that when clinicians had to use telehealth, they experienced negative feelings including anxiety.
“When faced with the necessity to use telehealth, some evidence suggests clinicians experienced negative feelings including anxiety (Doorn et al., 2021; Doran & Lawson, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Doorn et al., 2021 source
- cites Doran & Lawson, 2021 source
The Results (Technology and Preparedness; page unavailable) report that 62.5% of providers found the transition to telemental health at least somewhat stressful, citing the rapid transition, unfamiliar technology, and worry about provider–client rapport. The Discussion (page unavailable) also reports negative attitudes among a sizeable minority. These passages support negative feelings during the transition, but do not specifically report anxiety caused by having to use telehealth. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A large international survey found that most mental health clinicians during the pandemic worried about technical problems, care quality, and crisis response.
“A large international survey found the majority of mental health clinicians during the pandemic were concerned with technical issues, quality of care, and responding to crises (Montoya et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Montoya et al., 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Evidence suggests that using telehealth more often increases comfort with it and preference for it.
“Evidence suggests that frequency of telehealth use increases comfort with telehealth and preference to use telehealth (Connolly et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Connolly et al., 2020 source
The Results section (‘Attitude variability related to extent of TMH-V experience’; page unavailable) reports increased provider comfort after use, while the Discussion reports greater acceptance among experienced providers than nonusers. The review does not establish that using telehealth more frequently increases comfort or a preference to use it; it describes a tentative relationship between experience and attitudes, specifically for telemental health by videoconferencing. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Beyond external barriers, mental health clinicians hold beliefs, attitudes, and feelings about telehealth that can hinder its adoption.
“However, in addition to external barriers, mental health clinicians report many beliefs, attitudes, and feelings about telehealth that may be inconducive for the adoption of these technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Most stakeholders, including patients, employers, organizations, and managed care, gave clinicians a grace period to adjust and learn during the rapid telehealth transition.
“Most stakeholders — patients, employers, organizations, managed care — allowed clinicians a grace period to adjust their practices and learn (Puspitasari et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Puspitasari et al., 2021 source
In “Behavioral Health Programs That Adopted and Implemented Teletherapy After COVID-19” (page unavailable), the paper says clinical workloads were temporarily reduced while clinicians adapted to new workflows, and that training and consultation were available. This supports an organizational adjustment period, but it does not say that most stakeholders—including patients, employers, and managed care—gave clinicians a grace period. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Many obstacles to implementing telehealth come from policies and systems, including reimbursement and credentialing limits and extra administrative and training demands.
“Many barriers to telehealth implementation are rooted in policies and systems such as constraints in reimbursement and credentialing (Cowan et al., 2019) and added administrative and training burdens (Perry et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Recent reviews of telehealth barriers identify clinician reluctance as a central theme.
“Recent reviews of barriers to telehealth indicate a central theme of clinician reluctancy (Cowan et al., 2019; Langarizadeh et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Cowan et al., 2019 source
- cites Langarizadeh et al., 2017 source
The Discussion’s “Challenges” section names clinician reluctance as a challenge to telemental health care, and “Specific Designs” describes therapists’ concerns about adopting technology. The review does not establish reluctance as a central theme of telehealth barriers generally; it lists it among several challenges in the narrower telemental-health setting. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Qualitative studies showed clinicians confronting their telehealth concerns during the pandemic and committing to behavior changes that improved their patients' and their own experiences.
“Qualitative studies illustrated how clinicians faced their telehealth concerns during the pandemic and committed to behavior change that ultimately enriched the experience of their patients and themselves (Hersch et al., 2022; Uscher-Pines et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Hersch et al., 2022 source
- cites Uscher-Pines et al., 2020 source
The Lessons Learned section reports strategies psychiatrists credited with improving telemedicine visits, and the Discussion says the transition was largely positive for patients and physicians despite clinicians’ concerns. The paper does not establish that clinicians committed to behavior changes that ultimately improved both groups’ experiences; its patient findings are based on psychiatrists’ perceptions during the first weeks of the pandemic. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Direct experience with telehealth reduced negative reactions to telehealth.
“Direct experience with telehealth resulted in reduced negative reactions to telehealth (Doorn et al., 2021; Doran & Lawson, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The inhibitory learning model applies to a broad range of anxiety content.
“The inhibitory learning model is applicable to a wide spectrum of anxiety content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Craske et al., 2014 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Clinicians can use exposure strategies to overcome technophobia.
“We believe clinicians can use exposure strategies to overcome technophobia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A qualitative study found that about a quarter of clinicians initially reacted negatively and pessimistically to moving to telehealth, citing worries about care quality and handling complex cases and crises.
“A qualitative study found about a quarter of the sample’s clinicians described an initial negative and pessimistic reaction to their transition to telehealth, citing concerns about the quality of care and the ability to manage complex cases and crisis situations (Hersch et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hersch et al., 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Technology is already changing mental health practice in major ways.
“Technology is already changing mental health practices in profound ways (Reger, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reger, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Preliminary evidence indicates that technophobia predicts lower use of technologies such as the internet and wearables.
“Preliminary evidence suggests that technophobia predicts less use of technology such as the internet (Nimrod, 2021) and wearables (Aksoy et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The forced move to telehealth at the pandemic's start may have worked as an exposure exercise that altered many clinicians' cognitive and emotional responses to telehealth.
“We introduce the perspective that the necessary transition to telehealth at the start of the pandemic functioned as an exposure exercise that changed many clinicians’ cognitive and emotional reactions to the use of telehealth technologies.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“From the perspective of exposure therapy, the necessary transition to telehealth during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic may have functioned as an exposure exercise that changed cognitive and emotional reactions to telehealth technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mass transition to telehealth involved conditions that sufficiently resembled an exposure exercise to change clinicians' reactions.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
- Interpretationreasoning
The broad adoption of telehealth during the pandemic serves as a case study of clinicians overcoming reluctance to learn new skills.
“The widespread adoption of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic provides a case study in how clinicians are able to overcome hesitancy to learn new competencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Those conditions created chances for informal exposure exercises that led to adaptive changes in behavior and perspectives.
“These conditions provided the opportunity for informal exposure exercises that resulted in adaptive changes in behavior and perspectives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mass transition to telehealth involved conditions that sufficiently resembled an exposure exercise to change clinicians' reactions.
- Interpretationreasoning
What was new were the conditions that supported learning through exposure.
“Rather, conditions conducive for learning through exposure were new.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
During the COVID-19 pandemic, individual clinicians learned to use telehealth technologies.
“During the COVID-19 pandemic, individual clinicians learned how to use telehealth technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 10
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnother large survey found that about 28% of mental health clinicians had negative feelings about telehealth before the pandemic, and those feelings dropped significantly after they moved to telehealth.
“Another large survey found about 28% of mental health clinicians had negative feelings about telehealth prior to the pandemic and that these feelings decreased significantly after migrating to telehealth (Doran & Lawson, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Doran & Lawson, 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBefore the pandemic, clinicians often reported worries about technical competence, privacy, hassle, technical problems, and telehealth being impersonal and poor for alliance and nonverbal assessment.
“Pre-pandemic, clinicians often reported concern about their technical competency, privacy, increased hassle, potential for technical issues, and the perception that telehealth is impersonal and inconducive to building therapeutic alliance and assessing nonverbals (Connolly et al., 2020; Pierce et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Connolly et al., 2020 source
The Results (Overall attitudes toward TMH-V; page not provided) report concerns about technical problems, increased hassle, confidentiality, impersonal care, the therapeutic relationship, and difficulty detecting nonverbal cues. They also report a need for training and technical support, but do not clearly say clinicians worried about their own technical competence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Pierce et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health clinicians moved to telehealth, and some reported that their telehealth use might continue permanently.
“Mental health clinicians have migrated to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and have reported their use of telehealth may be permanent (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020; Dores et al., 2020; Sammons et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020 source
- cites Dores et al., 2020 source
The Results (§3.2.1; page unavailable) report that 91 of 108 surveyed Portuguese psychologists continued sessions using digital technologies during lockdown, supporting the move to telehealth. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) notes favorable views of these technologies after the pandemic, but does not report clinicians saying their telehealth use might be permanent. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Sammons et al., 2020 source
The Results (page not provided) document a rapid shift to telepsychology among surveyed psychologists: 83% reported using it almost exclusively after the crisis began. Wrapping Up & Reflection (page not provided) says persistence after the crisis was unclear and expresses the authors’ belief that the shift could create lasting change; it does not report clinicians saying their own use might be permanent. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne study found that only 29% of clinical psychologists used telehealth for part of their caseload before the pandemic, but within weeks over 80% used it for nearly all their caseload.
“One study found that only 29% of clinical psychologists used telehealth for a portion of their caseload prior to the pandemic and, within weeks of the pandemic, over 80% of the sample reported using telehealth for nearly their entire caseload (Sammons et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sammons et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningFuture clinical work will increasingly demand that mental health clinicians overcome technophobia to serve patients better and improve their own well-being.
“The future of clinical work will increasingly require mental health clinicians to better serve their patient populations and enhance their own well-being by overcoming technophobia, a broad term for any level of hesitancy, reluctance, skepticism, worry, anxiety, or fear of implementing technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTelehealth has long been recognized as an effective way to deliver cognitive behavioral treatments.
“Interestingly, however, telehealth has long been recognized as an effective modality for cognitive behavioral treatments (Batastini et al., 2021)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Batastini et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSuccessfully adopting clinical technologies could make the clinical workplace more productive and fulfilling by cutting routine work so clinicians can focus on meaningful tasks.
“However, successful adoption of these technologies can potentially lead to a more productive and fulfilling clinical workplace by reducing routine work so that clinicians can focus on meaningful work activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne study found that mental health clinicians on average had moderate anxiety about using telehealth during the pandemic, and those without prior telehealth experience had higher anxiety.
“One study found that, on average, mental health clinicians experienced a moderate level of anxiety about using telehealth during the pandemic and that those who had not previously used telehealth had higher levels of anxiety than those who had (Doorn et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doorn et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTechnology will change the nature of work across all occupations, including mental health work.
“Whether good or bad, technology will change the nature of work for all occupations — mental health work is no exception.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningMental health clinicians may be especially prone to technophobia because psychotherapy training and practice have rarely used technology.
“Importantly, mental health clinicians may be especially vulnerable to technophobia because the training and practice of psychotherapy has seldom leveraged technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationContemporary mental health clinicians report concerns that technology may glitch, carry biases, limit decision-making, and risk breaches of sensitive data.
“While not as severe, these reactions echo the responses of contemporary mental health clinicians who report concerns such as if technology will glitch, have biases, limit decision-making, and risk breaches of sensitive data (McClure, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClure, 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost new technologies will replace some labor, and historically this has provoked strong resistance such as strikes and sabotage.
“For example, most new technologies will replace some labor, which has historically been met with stark resistance (e.g., striking against integration and sabotaging implementation; Carlopio, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carlopio, 1988 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningClinicians can keep using an exposure approach to learn emerging technologies that could change clinical practice and benefit all stakeholders.
“Clinicians can continue taking an exposure approach to learning emerging technologies that have the potential to change the clinical landscape and benefit all stakeholders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA positive outcome amid the pandemic's tragedies has been major progress in realizing technology's potential to extend the reach of mental health treatment.
“One silver lining to the tragedies of the pandemic has been a giant step forward in realizing the potential of technology to enhance the reach of mental health treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningUnlike the global shift to telehealth, overcoming clinician technophobia about other future technologies will require proactive action.
“Unlike the global transition to telehealth, we expect that overcoming clinician technophobia concerning integrating other future technologies will require proactive action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenClinicians and technologists will both gain from more interaction.
“Clinicians and technologists will mutually benefit from further interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany clinicians reported that repeated exposure to telehealth produced favorable impressions, and their remaining concerns were about system support such as reimbursement and licensure rather than the technology itself.
“Many clinicians reported that consistent exposure to telehealth resulted in favorable impressions and that remaining concerns are not about the technology but the extent to which systems could support its continued use (e.g., differential reimbursement rates and licensure restrictions; Lipschitz et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lipschitz et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe COVID-19 pandemic pushed clinicians to overcome telehealth hesitancy, but technophobia may still block future technologies.
“While the COVID-19 pandemic provided an impetus for clinicians to overcome telehealth hesitancy, technophobia may continue to obstruct future technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningExposure therapy strategies can offer proactive steps toward integrating technology.
“In particular, strategies used in exposure therapy can provide proactive steps toward technological integration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough many barriers to adopting clinical technologies have long existed and some will remain, clinicians can now build on the insight that behavioral commitments and intentions to adapt can help them overcome their concerns and worries.
“While many barriers to adopting clinical technologies have existed for many years and some barriers will continue to persist, clinicians can now build off the insight that they can indeed overcome their concerns and worries with behavioral commitments and intentions to adapt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe mental health workforce is ready for a fundamental transformation in which clinicians, trainers, and organizations adopt emerging technologies to improve efficacy, reach, and worker well-being.
“The mental health workforce is primed for a fundamental transformation in which clinicians, trainers, and organizations embrace emerging technologies to increase efficacy, reach, and worker well-being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningClinical guidelines based on the inhibitory learning model can be adapted to help clinicians manage their own discomforts.
“However, clinical guidelines informed by this model (e.g., Maples-Keller et al., 2022) can be adapted to help clinicians address their own discomforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maples-Keller et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRelying only on human-to-human interactions can restrict how far clinician training and patient access can scale.
“However, relying solely on human-to-human interactions can limit the scalability of clinician training and patient access.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
For many clinicians in March 2020, telehealth became the only available way to deliver treatment.
“In March 2020, many clinicians learned that telehealth would be the only treatment delivery modality available.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mental health treatment has historically not depended on technology for learning or delivering evidence-based practice.
“Historically, mental health treatment has not required technology in learning or delivering evidence-based practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mass transition to telehealth involved conditions that sufficiently resembled an exposure exercise to change clinicians' reactions.
“These conditions provided the opportunity for informal exposure exercises that resulted in adaptive changes in behavior and perspectives.”
Cites
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · cited 1× · see citing works
“1 3 and intentions of clinicians is crucial to technological integration (Venkatesh et al., 2003) and will be vital to implementing best practices in future clinical work (Liu et al.”
BackgroundThe fourth industrial revolution
Schwab, K. 1. (n.d.) · Cited by 3,008 · see citing works
Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006 · Cited by 2,339 · see citing works
Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2019) · Psychology of Popular Media Culture · doi:10.1037/ppm0000203 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory
Li, J., & Huang, J. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 · Cited by 504 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Modern computational solutions have stoked workers’ fears about technology being unethical, uncontrollable, unintelligible, unfair, and even harmful to human survival (Li & Huang, 2020).”
BackgroundAbras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. J. (2004) · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence as Augmenting Automation: Implications for Employment
Tschang, F. T., & Almirall, E. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2019.0062 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Békés, V., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2020) · Journal of Psychotherapy Integration · doi:10.1037/int0000214 · Cited by 393 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of work · COVID-19 · Pandemic · Technology integration · Technology acceptance Mental health clinicians have migrated to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and have reported their use of telehealth may be permanent (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020; Dores et al., 2020; Sammons et al., 2020).”
BackgroundA systematic review of providers’ attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing.
Connolly, S. L., Miller, C. J., Lindsay, J. A., & Bauer, M. S. (2020) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12311 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Barriers to Use of Telepsychiatry: Clinicians as Gatekeepers
Cowan, K. E., McKean, A. J., Gentry, M. T., & Hilty, D. M. (2019) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
McClure, P. K. (2018) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439317698637 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Job Polarization and Jobless Recoveries
Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H. (2019) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00875 · Cited by 366 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Unlike previous industrial revolutions, however, technology (e.g., automation, machine learning, artificial intelligence) is not creating jobs that are at the same skill level as the jobs it is replacing (Jaimovich & Siu, 2020; Tschang & Mezquita, 2020).”
BackgroundTelemental Health Care, an Effective Alternative to Conventional Mental Care: a Systematic Review
Langarizadeh, M., Tabatabaei, M., Tavakol, K., Naghipour, M., & Moghbeli, F. (2017) · Acta Informatica Medica · doi:10.5455/aim.2017.25.240-246 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Current research and future perspectives on human factors and ergonomics in Industry 4.0
Kadir, B. A., Broberg, O., & da Conceição, C. S. (2019) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106004 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Liu, L., Miguel Cruz, A., Rios Rincon, A., Buttar, V., Ranson, Q., & Goertzen, D. (2015) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.923529 · Cited by 229 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2003) and will be vital to implementing best practices in future clinical work (Liu et al., 2015).”
BackgroundAutomatic detection of social rhythms in bipolar disorder
Abdullah, S., Matthews, M. L., Frank, E., Doherty, G. J., Gay, G. K., & Choudhury, T. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv200 · Cited by 225 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, recent efforts have demonstrated that clinically relevant data can be detected by passive sensors on smartphones (Abdullah et al., 2016) and interventions can be delivered via chatbots (Daley et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLee, Y., Yamashita, N., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392836 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Uscher-Pines, L., Sousa, J., Raja, P., Mehrotra, A., Barnett, M. L., & Huskamp, H. A. (2020) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000250 · Cited by 183 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Qualitative studies illustrated how clinicians faced their telehealth concerns during the pandemic and committed to behavior change that ultimately enriched the experience of their patients and themselves (Hersch et al., 2022; Uscher-Pines et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSmart nudging: How cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value co-creation
Mele, C., Spena, T. R., Kaartemo, V., & Marzullo, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.004 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Batastini, A. B., Paprzycki, P., Jones, A. C. T., & MacLean, N. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101944 · Cited by 181 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, however, telehealth has long been recognized as an effective modality for cognitive behavioral treatments (Batastini et al., 2021), so why did it take a pandemic to trigger this mass adoption? Many barriers to telehealth implementation are rooted in policies and systems such as constraints in reimbursem…”
BackgroundTechnophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it
Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.008 · Cited by 175 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…the perspective that the future of clinical work will increasingly require mental health clinicians to overcome technophobia, which we broadly define as any level of hesitancy, reluctance, skepticism, worry, anxiety, or fear of implementing technology in one’s clinical practice (Khasawneh, 2018).”
BackgroundAafjes-van Doorn, K., Békés, V., & Prout, T. A. (2021) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2020.1773404 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“Where’s the I-O?” Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Talent Management Systems
Gonzalez, M., Capman, J. F., Oswald, F. L., Theys, E. R., & Tomczak, D. L. (2019) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2019.03.005 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Perry, K., Gold, S., & Shearer, E. M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22770 · Cited by 111 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2019) and added administrative and training burdens (Perry et al., 2020).”
BackgroundDores, A. R., Geraldo, A., Carvalho, I. P., & Barbosa, F. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17207663 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Preliminary Evaluation of the Engagement and Effectiveness of a Mental Health Chatbot
Daley, K., Hungerbuehler, I., Cavanagh, K., Claro, H. G., Swinton, P. A., & Kapps, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2020.576361 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Imel, Z. E., Pace, B. T., Soma, C. S., Tanana, M., Hirsch, T., Gibson, J., Georgiou, P., Narayanan, S. S., & Atkins, D. C. (2019) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/pst0000221 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Psychological Practice and the COVID-19 Crisis: A Rapid Response Survey
Sammons, M. T., VandenBos, G. R., & Martin, J. N. (2020) · Journal of Health Service Psychology · doi:10.1007/s42843-020-00013-2 · Cited by 75 · cited 2× · see citing works
“One study found that only 29% of clinical psychologists used telehealth for a portion of their caseload prior to the pandemic and, within weeks of the pandemic, over 80% of the sample reported using telehealth for nearly their entire caseload (Sammons et al., 2020).”
BackgroundIndividuals' intention to use sports wearables: the moderating role of technophobia
Cavdar Aksoy, N., Kocak Alan, A., Tumer Kabadayi, E., & Aksoy, A. (2020) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-08-2019-0083 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Preliminary evidence suggests that technophobia predicts less use of technology such as the internet (Nimrod, 2021) and wearables (Aksoy et al., 2020).”
BackgroundExtended Reality for Enhanced Telehealth During and Beyond COVID-19: Viewpoint
Ong, T., Wilczewski, H., Paige, S. R., Soni, H., Welch, B. M., & Bunnell, B. E. (2021) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/26520 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Wells, S. Y., Morland, L. A., Wilhite, E. R., Grubbs, K. M., Rauch, S. A. M., Acierno, R. E., & McLean, C. P. (2020) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22573 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2021), which included specific guidance for evidence-based protocols (e.g., prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder; Fina et al., 2021; Wells et al., 2020).”
BackgroundTelepsychotherapy in the age of COVID-19: A commentary.
Inchausti, F., MacBeth, A. M., Hasson‐Ohayon, I., & Dimaggio, G. (2020) · Journal of Psychotherapy Integration · doi:10.1037/int0000222 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Not good days for technophobes: older internet users during the COVID-19 pandemic
Nimrod, G. (2021) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2021.1894530 · Cited by 46 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Preliminary evidence suggests that technophobia predicts less use of technology such as the internet (Nimrod, 2021) and wearables (Aksoy et al.”
BackgroundMontoya, M. I., Kogan, C. S., Rebello, T. J., Sadowska, K., Garcia-Pacheco, J. A., Khoury, B., Kulygina, M., Matsumoto, C., Robles, R., Huang, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.050 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A large international survey found the majority of mental health clinicians during the pandemic were concerned with technical issues, quality of care, and responding to crises (Montoya et al., 2022).”
BackgroundPuspitasari, A. J., Heredia, D., Gentry, M., Sawchuk, C., Theobald, B., Moore, W., Tiede, M., Galardy, C., & Schak, K. (2021) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.05.002 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Most stakeholders — patients, employers, organizations, managed care — allowed clinicians a grace period to adjust their practices and learn (Puspitasari et al., 2021).”
BackgroundLipschitz, J. M., Connolly, S. L., Van Boxtel, R., Potter, J. R., Nixon, N., & Bidargaddi, N. (2023) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000625 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Hersch, Cohen, Saklecha, A., Williams, Tan, & Lattie (2024) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2022.2038178 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Understanding the Care Ecologies of Veterans with PTSD
Evans, H. I., Lakshmi, U. K., Watson, H., Ismail, A., Sherrill, A. M., Kumar, N., & Arriaga, R. I. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376170 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationComer, J. S. (2021) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.09.002 · Cited by 28 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Collectively, the mental health field has demonstrated remarkable resourcefulness and innovation during the pandemic (Comer, 2021; Drude, 2021).”
BackgroundThe Impact of COVID-19 on Provider Perceptions of Telemental Health
Doran, J. M., & Lawson, J. L. (2021) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-021-09899-7 · Cited by 26 · cited 3× · see citing works
“When faced with the necessity to use telehealth, some evidence suggests clinicians experienced negative feelings including anxiety (Doorn et al., 2021; Doran & Lawson, 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialA history of social psychological reactions to new technology
Carlopio, J. (1988) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00272.x · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, most new technologies will replace some labor, which has historically been met with stark resistance (e.g., striking against integration and sabotaging implementation; Carlopio, 1988).”
BackgroundPierce, B. S., Perrin, P. B., & McDonald, S. D. (2022) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000435 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Pre-pandemic, clinicians often reported concern about their technical competency, privacy, increased hassle, potential for technical issues, and the perception that telehealth is impersonal and inconducive to building therapeutic alliance and assessing nonverbals (Connolly et al., 2020; Pierce et al., 2020).”
Background(2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429020537 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Conducting Prolonged Exposure for PTSD During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Treatment
Fina, B. A., Wright, E. C., Rauch, S. A. M., Norman, S. B., Acierno, R. E., Cuccurullo, L. J., Dondanville, K. A., Moring, J. C., Brown, L. A., & Foa, E. B. (2020) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.09.003 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Bridging the Gap: Creating a Clinician-Facing Dashboard for PTSD
Schertz, E. M., Watson, H., Krishna, A., Sherrill, A. M., Evans, H. I., & Arriaga, R. I. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29381-9_14 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The most impactful technologies will result from an iterative design cycle that begins with understanding the user and the user’s context and then continuingly evaluates prototypes against identified user requirements (Schertz et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDrude, K. P. (2021) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-021-00219-1 · Cited by 5 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Collectively, the mental health field has demonstrated remarkable resourcefulness and innovation during the pandemic (Comer, 2021; Drude, 2021).”
BackgroundArriaga, R. I., & Abowd, G. D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_5 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Computer scientists specializing in human–computer interaction are leading efforts to understand how clinicians can best use the contents of their digital toolboxes (Abras et al., 2004; Arriaga & Abowd, 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEditorial: Applications of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy in Response to COVID-19
Kazantzis, N., Carper, M. M., McLean, C. P., & Sprich, S. E. (2021) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.09.001 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Use of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety- and Trauma-Related Disorders
Sherrill, A. M., Goodnight, J. R. M., Burton, M. S., & ROTHBAUM, B. O. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429020537-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationPerspectives on Integrating Trusted Other Feedback in Therapy for Veterans with PTSD
Evans, H. I., Deeter, C. R., Zhou, J., Do, K., Sherrill, A. M., & Arriaga, R. I. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517513 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationExtinction-Based Exposure Therapies Using Virtual Reality
Maples‐Keller, J. L., Sherrill, A. M., Reddi, P. J., Norrholm, S. D., & ROTHBAUM, B. O. (2023) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2023_437 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lestari, H. M., Miranda, A. V., & Fuady, A. (2024) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101684 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“[37 ] This is also reflected in policy making: a study in Sweden reported that in implementing telemedicine, policymakers were concerned about the need to train healthcare workers.”
Gani, I., Litchfield, I. J., Shukla, D., Delanerolle, G., Cockburn, N., & Pathmanathan, A. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/62763 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“It is hoped that trust in CRs can be fostered through greater and earlier engagement with clinician end users by software developers and senior decision makers [92-94].”
Hannan, A., Hussain, A., & Tab, M. A. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102225 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Cascini, F., Gentili, A., Causio, F. A., Altamura, G., Melnyk, A., Beccia, F., Pappalardo, C., Lontano, A., & Ricciardi, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147210 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“In addition to policy barriers, clinicians usually report three main areas of misbelief on the matter, namely error risk, lack of interaction and fear of becoming not necessary for the process of care (37).”
BackgroundInfluentialSchreiter, M., Hennrich, J., Wolf, A. L., & Eymann, T. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/62649 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“This phenomenon is termed technophobia [60], encompassing any hesitation, reservation, skepticism, concern, fear, or dread regarding implementing technology in clinical practice [61].”
Crowe, S. E., Yousefi, M., Shahri, B., Piumsomboon, T., & Hoermann, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2024.1284696 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Alemu, Y., Chen, H., Duan, C., Caulley, D., Arriaga, R. I., & Sezgın, E. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/46970 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Adoption of this technology will require the design of user-friendly interfaces, such as the TQI app, that can help mitigate clinician technophobia [38].”
Self-citationDoorn, K. A. (2024) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12800 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Editorial: Factors influencing user engagement with digital mental health interventions
Borghouts, J., Pretorius, C., Ayobi, A., Abdullah, S., & Eikey, E. V. (2023) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1197301 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationSwinger, N., Baseman, C. M., Ryu, M., Abdullah, S., Wiese, C. W., Sherrill, A. M., & Arriaga, R. I. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3710917 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationMoran, L. H., Kee, S. C., Wiese, C. W., Arriaga, R. I., Abdullah, S., & Sherrill, A. M. (2025) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2025.06.007 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationPractical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study
Wosny, M., Strasser, L. M., Kraehenmann, S., & Hastings, J. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/60031 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In addition, to empower new end users in conquering their technological apprehensions, clinical instructors must proactively address common skepticism, worry, anxiety, or fears of implementing technology to overcome “technophobia” [71].”
Sherrill, A. M., Wiese, C. W., Abdullah, S., & Arriaga, R. I. (2025) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00484-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“To facilitate AI integration, risk mitigation frameworks will be needed (e.g., using exposure-based principles to overcome technophobia, Sherrill et al., 2022).”
Self-citationBruce, M. J., Pagán, A. F., & Acierno, R. E. (2024) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.23074 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Haydon, H. M., Fowler, J. A., Taylor, M. L., Smith, A. C., & Caffery, L. J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/54636 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Exposure therapy is one way to mitigate HCP anxiety [136], but simply repeated positive experiences and support engaging with VCs can reduce discomfort and lead to relief and sometimes even excitement [49,86,87].”
Chang, Y.-L. B., Woestman, S. L., Shokr, S., Tang, R., & Ward, H. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3647973 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-efficacy as a mediator between psychologists’ technology affinity and telehealth satisfaction
Mason, J., & Woodward, M. (2024) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050067.2024.2419596 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“However, the increased demand raises questions regarding clinicians’ experiences, given the rapid implementation alongside existing concerns with technology (Connolly et al., 2020; Sherrill et al., 2022) and inadequate skills (Glueckauf et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2021; Montoya et al., 2022).”
Koch, A., Graczykowska, A., Szumiał, S., Rudnicka, P., & Marszał‐Wiśniewska, M. (2024) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.3055 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bennett, R., & Vijaygopal, R. (2023) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.3233/tad-221502 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…of hands-on experience of, initially simple, technical devices to create incremental learning; “planned exposures” to new assistive devices which aim to “reduce unhelpful emotional responses to technology and evoke helpful perspectives and behavioural flexibility towards technology” [109, p. 550].”
Mitchell, B. J., Braley, E. I., Jagannathan, N., Goodman, W. K., Storch, E. A., & Wiese, A. D. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/jcp-2025-0033 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Generative Artificial Intelligence for Exposure Therapy: Guidelines for Clinicians and Patients
Sherrill, A. M., Mattioli, D. O., Schneider, R. L., Bell, K. M., Kee, S., Wiese, C. W., Abdullah, S., & Ellis, D. M. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/jcp-2025-0036 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationKI-Dokumentation in der Psychotherapie
Goer, V., & Schwarz, J. (2026) · Die Psychotherapie · doi:10.1007/s00278-026-00842-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Techno-Paranoia, Techno-Fear and Narcissism as Determinants of Consumer Trust in Wearables
Gregor, B., & Gwiaździński, E. (2023) · Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations · doi:10.2478/minib-2023-0021 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
An investigation of factors impacting the acceptance of telehealth in rural India
Moray, R. (2025) · Discover Social Science and Health · doi:10.1007/s44155-025-00250-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“It is considered as a negative emotion that tends to build as a consequence of distress experienced by people while using a new technology and hence there exists an unfavorable relationship between using a novel technological system and technology anxiety [87].”
Extended reality interventions for health and procedural anxiety: An overview of reviews
Arthur, T., Robinson, S., Harris, D., Wilson, M., Vine, S. J., & Meléndez‐Torres, G. J. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251411512 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…of acceptance and usability within paediatric and adult populations (see Supplementary File 6), and that these poorer outcomes for young children and elderly adults correspond with patterns seen in wider areas (e.g. in the immersive media industry 92 and in more general health-related sectors 93 ).”
Swinger, N., Ryu, M., Baseman, C. M., Xu, K., Sherrill, A. M., & Arriaga, R. I. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3816986 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationHarison, E., & Lahav, Y. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16188154 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
GreenEye: Smart Consulting System for Domestic Farmers
Mendis, O., Perera, A., Ranasinghe, S., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC) · doi:10.1109/icac57685.2022.10025193
Jones, S. L., Watts, D., Brache, K., & Bedford, E. (2024) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-024-00400-2
“…pandemic, the slow adoption of telehealth services within outpatient settings may be explained by perceived barriers associated with implementation, including clinician reluctance, privacy concerns, and beliefs that telehealth would interfere with the therapeutic alliance (Sherrill et al., 2022).”
Clinicians’ Attitudes Toward using Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Interventions
Békés, V., & Doorn, K. A. (2026) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-026-00607-5
Byeon, Y. V., Brookman-Frazee, L. I., Flores, A., Lechuga, C., Lind, T., Diaz, D., Yu, S. H., & Lau, A. S. (2026) · Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1080/23794925.2026.2666782
- Authors
- Sherrill, A. M., Wiese, C. W., Abdullah, S., & Arriaga, R. I.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sherrill, Andrew M.
- Venue
- Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
- Published
- 2022-08-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-553
- ISSN
- 2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9391067
- OpenAlex
- W4293778617
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1915504)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- telemedicine, technophobia, COVID-19 pandemic, exposure therapy, technology adoption, mental health professionals, clinician well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review