Cited by 69Fault Detection and Control SystemsEngineering and Test SystemsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

A Novel Fault Detection, Identification and Prediction Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Controllers Using SVM

Open access
Biddle, Liam, Fallah, Saber·2021·Automotive Innovation

Abstract

Abstract Faults that develop in vehicle sensors have the potential to propagate unchecked throughout control systems if undetected. Automatic fault diagnosis and health monitoring algorithms will become necessary as automotive applications become more autonomous. The current fault diagnosis systems are not effective for complex systems such as autonomous cars where the case of simultaneous faults in different sensors is highly possible. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel fault detection, isolation and identification architecture for multi-fault in multi-sensor systems with an efficient computational burden for real-time implementation. Support Vector Machine techniques are used to detect and identify faults in sensors for autonomous vehicle control systems. In addition, to identify degrading performance in a sensor and predict the time at which a fault will occur, a novel predictive algorithm is proposed. The effectiveness and accuracy of the architecture in detecting and identifying multiple faults as well as the accuracy of the proposed predictive fault detection algorithm are verified through a MATLAB/IPG CarMaker co-simulation platform. The results present detection and identification accuracies of 94.94% and 97.01%, respectively, as well as a prediction accuracy of 75.35%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s42154-021-00138-0

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Davies, E.: Computer vision-principles, algorithms, applications, learning. Elsevier, London (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biddle, L., & Fallah, S.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Fallah, Saber
Venue
Automotive Innovation
Published
2021-04-05
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
301-314
ISSN
  • 2096-4250 (ISSN-L)
  • 2522-8765
OpenAlex
W3143504837
Cited by
69
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Automotive Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Engineering and Test Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
fault detection, fault identification, fault prediction, autonomous vehicles, support vector machine, multi-sensor systems, multi-fault diagnosis, real-time implementation, health monitoring, fault propagation, sensor degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review