Cited by 9COVID-19 and Mental HealthChildren's Rights and ParticipationSocial impacts of COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Youth lens: Youth perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being in an urban community.

Open access
Benninger, Elizabeth, Schmidt-Sane, Megan, Hajski, Ashley·2023·International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly altered the lives of children and youth throughout the world, with significant implications for their long-term health and well-being. Children were largely excluded from the development and implementation of the various pandemic mitigation strategies and policies, yet their lives were significantly affected. This study sought to shed light on children's perspectives and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, the various ways it impacted their health and well-being, along with the resources which allowed them to continue to flourish in the face of extreme hardship. We present a subset of findings regarding the COVID-19 pandemic from the Youth Lens study, with 65 youth (aged 10-18) from urban communities in Cleveland, OH, USA. We utilized a participatory methodology with youth, including the data collection techniques of photo voice, community mapping, group discussion, individual interviews, and journaling. This study highlights important and timely findings related to children's well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic from the youth's perspectives and underscores potential ways to address their challenges and concerns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s42448-022-00130-z

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Benninger, E., Schmidt-Sane, M., & Hajski, A.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Benninger, Elizabeth
Venue
International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice
Published
2022-09-29
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
367-392
ISSN
  • 2524-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 2524-5244
OpenAlex
W4298002267
Cited by
9
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (MD002265)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social impacts of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, youth perspectives, child well-being, child health, urban communities, youth voice, photovoice, participatory mapping, participatory research, pandemic mitigation policy, Cleveland (Ohio)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review