Does sorghum phenolic extract have antifungal effect?
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal effect of SC319 sorghum phenolic extract (SPE) on the Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, Stenocarpella, Colletotrichum, and Macrophomina genera. SPE was extracted by 20% ethanol and used in four assays: (1) against Fusarium verticillioides in solid (PDA) and liquid (PD) potato dextrose media; (2) Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assay with 16 fungi isolates; (3) Conidial Germination Rate (CGR) with 14 fungi isolates and (4) Growth Curve (GC) with 11 fungi isolates. There was no reduction in the mycelial growth (colony diameter and dry weight) and in the number of Fusarium verticillioides spores in assay 1 (PDA and PD). The colony's dry weight was almost six times higher in the presence than in the absence of SPE. All SPE samples presented MIC (assay 1) above the maximum concentration tested (5000 µg.mL-1) for the 16 isolates. Also, there was no inhibitory effect of SPE on conidia germination rate (CGR). Oppositely, in GC assay, the control had a higher CFU count than the samples with SPE in 24 h. This result suggests that SPE can delay the fungal growth in the first hours of incubation, which is an important finding that may help reduce the severity of fungal diseases in plants. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results, including sorghum genotypes with different profiles of phenolic compounds. Although the SC319 SPE was not effective as an antifungal agent, it may have potential as a growth promoter of beneficial fungi in the food and pharmaceutical industries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 33 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Naeem et al. (2021) found that all tested concentrations of Sorghum halepense leaf extract inhibited the growth of all tested fungal strains.
“All the applied concentrations of S. halepense leaf extract inhibited the growth of all the tested fungal strains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Naeem Z, Jabeen K, Saeed MK, Iqbal S (2021) Phytochmical analysis and antifungal potential of Sorghum Halepense (L.) Pers. for the management of mycotoxigenic fungi. Pakistan J Weed Sci Res 27(4). https://doi.org/10.28941/pjwsr.v27i4.1008 source
- Interpretationcitation
The effect of different phenolic acids and flavonoids on mycelium growth in cereal-based media varied largely depending on the Fusarium species and the concentration tested.
“The effect of different phenolic acids and flavonoids on the mycelium growth assay, using cereal based media, varied largely depending on the Fusarium species and the concentration levels tested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Funnell-Harris DL, Sattler SE, Pedersen JF (2014) Response of Fusarium thapsinum to sorghum brown midrib lines and to phenolic metabolites. Plant Dis 98:1300–1308 source
The in vitro growth methods and results (page unavailable) show that responses to several phenolic acids varied by fungal species and concentration. However, the assays used peptone-glucose agar, not cereal-based media, and the tested compounds did not include flavonoids. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [34] Schöneberg T, Kibler K, Sulyok M, Musa T, Bucheli DT, Mascher F, Bertossa M, Voegele RT, Vogelgsang S (2018) Can plant phenolic compounds reduce Fusarium growth and mycotoxin production in cereals? Food Addit Contam Part A 35(12):2455–2470. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1538570 source
- Findingown data
In solid PDA medium, sorghum phenolic extract did not change the colony diameter of Fusarium verticillioides.
“In the PDA treatment, with the application of sorghum phenolic extract and control, there was no difference on F. verticillioides colonie diameters which means that there was no effect of SPE on fungal growth (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For all 16 tested fungi isolates, the minimum inhibitory concentration of sorghum phenolic extract exceeded 5000 μg/mL.
“After seven days of growth all SPE samples presented MIC above 5000 µg.mL -1 for the 16 fungi analyzed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In liquid PD medium without agitation, the dry weight of Fusarium verticillioides colonies was nearly six times greater with sorghum phenolic extract than in the control.
“In the liquid medium without agitation (PD), the colony dry weight was almost six times higher in the treatment with SPE (2.15 g) than the control (0.37 g)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
In liquid PD medium with agitation, the number of Fusarium verticillioides spores was about twice as high with sorghum phenolic extract as in the control.
“in the PDag, the spores.mL-1 was almost twice higher (257 × 10 5 spores.mL -1 ) than the control (155 × 10 5 spores.mL-1 ) (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sorghum phenolic extract showed no antifungal effect on Fusarium verticillioides development in liquid media with or without agitation.
“Thus, no antifungal effect of SPE was observed on the F. verticillioides development in PD and PDag.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 24 h in the growth curve assay, CFU counts were greater in control samples than in those receiving sorghum phenolic extract.
“Oppositely, in GC assay, the control had a higher CFU count than the samples with SPE in 24 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The levels of phenolic compounds extracted from sorghum with different solvents ranged from 10.07 to 20.1 mg gallic acid equivalent per gram.
“There were significant differences (p > 0.05) in the phenolic compounds levels from sorghum extracted with different solvents, which varied between 10.07 and 20.1 mg GAE.g -1 (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the fungal species other than the four that showed higher germination with sorghum phenolic extract, there was no significant difference in conidial germination between presence and absence of the extract.
“There was no significant difference in the presence and absence of the extract for the other species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the growth curve assay, control samples showed higher growth than samples treated with sorghum phenolic extract.
“However, these results differ from those found in the growth curve (GC) of the assay 4, whose control samples showed higher growth than those with SPE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SC319 sorghum phenolic extract stimulated the growth of some fungal species in the PDA and PD media, minimum inhibitory concentration, and conidia germination rate assays.
“Contrary to expectations, there was more remarkable fungus development in the treatments with sorghum phenolic extract in these three assays.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Contrary to expected, the sorghum phenolic extract (SPE) from the bran of the SC319 genotype stimulated the growth of some fungal species in the PDA and PD media, MIC, and Conidia Germination Rate assays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
For Fusarium verticillioides BRM 51204, growth curves with and without sorghum phenolic extract were similar over 24 h.
“For F. verticillioides BRM 51204, with and without SPE, they had similar curves during the 24 h.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Sorghum phenolic extract had no inhibitory effect on the conidial germination rate of the tested fungal species.
“Thus, the results demonstrate no inhibitory effect of SPE on conidia germination rate (CGR) of the tested species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant difference in fungal growth between the presence and absence of sorghum phenolic extract in the growth curve assay.
“There was a significant difference in the growth of fungi in the presence and absence of SPE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fusarium andiyazi CML 2793 had about fortyfold greater CFU counts in the absence of the extract.
“especially for F. andiyazi CML 2793, whose CFU value was 40 times higher in samples without SPE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The final concentration of freeze-dried sorghum phenolic extract was 266 mg gallic acid equivalent per gram.
“The final concentration of freezedried sorghum phenolic extract was 266 mg GAE.g -1 ), which was used in the antifungal assays of this work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the growth curve assay, the sorghum phenolic extract had an inhibitory effect on the growth of some fungi at 24 hours.
“Instead, in the Grow Curve assay, SPE had an inhibitory effect on some fungi growth in 24 h”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The SC319 sorghum phenolic extract did not inhibit the growth of the analyzed fungal species, since all samples grew normally compared with those exposed to synthetic antifungals.
“Therefore, it was possible to notice that the phenolic extract of sorghum SC 319 did not present an inhibitory effect on the growth of the species analyzed since all samples obtained normal growth compared to those that received synthetic antifungals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The effect of sorghum phenolic extract application may depend on the fungal species.
“Thus, the result of SPE application may depend on the species of fungus, although more work must be done to confirm this hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Kil et al. (2009) found that none of four sorghum cultivars showed antifungal or anticandidal activity.
“However, none of the cultivars showed antifungal or anticandidal activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Kil HY, Seong ES, Ghimire BK, Chung I, Kwon SS, Goh EJ, Heo KH, Kim MJ, Lim JD, Lee D, Yu CY (2009) Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of crude sorghum extract. Food Chem 115(4):1234–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.032 source
- Interpretationown data
The conidial germination result for Fusarium verticillioides CML 2743 agrees with the preliminary assay 1 result for that species, where SPE treatment values were higher than control.
“This result corroborates those observed in the preliminary assay (assay 1) for the species F. verticillioides CML 2743 (B), in which the values of the SPE treatment were higher than those in control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Funnell-Harris et al. (2017) found that Fusarium thapsinum grew significantly faster in a medium with sorghum extract (bmr6) than in the control or in media with added sugar.
“Funnell-Harris et al. (2017) [32] observed that F. thapsinum cultivated in a medium with sorghum extract (bmr6) showed significantly faster growth than the control and the media added with sugar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Funnell-Harris DL, O’neill PM, Sattler SE, Gries T, Berhow MA, Pedersen JF (2017) Response of sorghum stalk pathogens to brown midrib plants and soluble phenolic extracts from near isogenic lines. Eur J Plant Pathol 148(4):941–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1148-2 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The sorghum phenolic extract can delay fungal growth during the first hours.
“It is speculated that this result may be due to the growth time of the fungi; that is, in the growth curve, the evaluation was performed after 48 h and in the MIC after 168 h, suggesting that the SPE can delay the fungal growth in the first hours, since there was growth but, slowly.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
“Instead, in the Grow Curve assay, SPE had an inhibitory effect on some fungi growth in 24 h, suggesting that the SPE can delay the fungal growth in the first hours.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
- Interpretationown data
The SC319 extract might serve as a promoter of beneficial fungal growth in food and pharmaceutical applications.
“Although the SC319 SPE was not effective as an antifungal agent, it may have potential as a growth promoter of beneficial fungi in the food and pharmaceutical industries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Javaid et al. (2012) found that methanolic extracts from shoots, roots, and inflorescences of Sorghum halepense at 0.5-3.0 g/100 mL had antifungal activity against Macrophomina phaseolina, significantly reducing fungal biomass.
“The authors demonstrated that different concentrations of methanolic extracts (from 0.5 to 3.0 g.100 -1 mL) from shoots, roots, and inflorescences of S. halapense had antifungal activity against M. phaseolina by reducing the fungal biomass significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Javaid A, Naqvi SF, Shoaib A (2012) Antifungal activity of methanolic extracts of Sorghum halepense against Macrophomina phaseolina. Afr J Microbiol Res 6(28):5814–5818 source
- Premisecitation
Ataei Azimi et al. (2007) found that phenolic extracts from seeds and leaves of Sorghum bicolor at 0-25 mg/L had high antifungal activity against Fusarium poae and F. solani.
“Ataei Azimi et al. (2007) [28] showed high antifungal activity of phenolic extracts from seeds and leaves of Sorghum bicolor (0 -25 mg.L -1 ) on Fusarium poae and F. solani.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] AtaeiAzimi AA, DelnavazHashemloian B, Mansoorghanaei A (2007) Antifungal effects of water, alcoholic and phenolic extracts of seeds and leaves of Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench on Fusarium solani and F. poae. J Med Plants 6:26–32
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The SC319 sorghum phenolic extract can be used to enhance the growth of beneficial fungi used in the food and pharmaceutical industries.
“Although the results of this study were not conclusive regarding the antifungal potential of SC319 sorghum phenolic extract, it can be used to enhance the growth of beneficial fungi commonly used in the food and pharmaceutical industries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ratnavathi & Sashidhar (2007) found that phenolic extracts from six sorghum cultivars at 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1.0% reduced the growth and biomass of Aspergillus parasiticus.
“The concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0% reduced the growth and biomass of Aspergillus parasiticus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Ratnavathi CV, Sashidhar RB (2007) Inhibitory effect of phenolics extracted from sorghum genotypes on Aspergillus parasiticus (NRRL 2999) growth and aflatoxin production. J Sci Food Agric 87(6):1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2827 source
- Interpretationown data
Sorghum phenolic extract can delay fungal growth during the first hours of incubation.
“This result suggests that SPE can delay the fungal growth in the first hours of incubation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The SC319 genotype used in this work contains high levels of tannins.
“Although the SC 319 genotype in the present work contains high levels of tannins [18]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Anunciação PC, Cardoso LM, Gomes JVP, Della Lucia CM, Carvalho CWP, Galdeano MC, Queiroz VAV, Alfenas RCG, Martino HSD, Pinheiro-Sant’Ana HM (2017) Comparing sorghum and wheat whole grain breakfast cereals: sensorial acceptance and bioactive compound content. Food Chem 221:984–989 source
- Interpretationown data
The results of this study were not conclusive regarding the antifungal potential of the SC319 sorghum phenolic extract.
“Although the results of this study were not conclusive regarding the antifungal potential of SC319 sorghum phenolic extract”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- May combine two claims. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNatural products or their derivatives accounted for one quarter of antifungal substances used globally.
“Consequently, 25% of the substances used as antifungal agents worldwide were obtained from natural products or derivatives [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Scorzoni L, Sangalli-Leite F, Singulani JL, Silva ACAP, Costa-Orlandi CB, Fusco-Almeida AM, Mendes-Giannini MJS (2016) Searching new antifungals: the use of in vitro and in vivo methods for evaluation of natural compounds. J Microbiol Methods 123:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.02.005 source
The Introduction (p. 2) says about a quarter of drugs used worldwide were discovered in natural products or their derivatives, but that figure refers to drugs generally, not antifungal agents. It separately says most antifungal drugs used today were discovered from natural sources; it does not give a 25% figure for antifungals. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSynthetic fungicides are non-biodegradable, expensive, toxic, and hazardous to the environment and to human and animal health.
“However, as they are non-biodegradable substances, these products, besides high costs, are toxic and pose risks to the environment and human and animal health [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Scorzoni L, Sangalli-Leite F, Singulani JL, Silva ACAP, Costa-Orlandi CB, Fusco-Almeida AM, Mendes-Giannini MJS (2016) Searching new antifungals: the use of in vitro and in vivo methods for evaluation of natural compounds. J Microbiol Methods 123:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.02.005 source
The Introduction (p. 2) says antifungal therapy is frequently associated with elevated toxicity, which supports the toxicity concern in a clinical context. It does not establish that synthetic fungicides are non-biodegradable or expensive, or that they pose environmental or animal-health risks. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFunnell-Harris et al. (2014) found that Fusarium thapsinum was tolerant to sorghum phenolic compounds, but ferulic acid at 0.5 mM inhibited Fusarium verticillioides, Fusarium proliferatum, and Macrophomina phaseolina.
“F. thapsinum was tolerant to these compounds.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“However, the authors observed inhibition of F. verticilioides, F. proliferatum, and M. phaseolina even at the lowest concentration of ferulic acid (0.5 mM).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Funnell-Harris DL, Sattler SE, Pedersen JF (2014) Response of Fusarium thapsinum to sorghum brown midrib lines and to phenolic metabolites. Plant Dis 98:1300–1308 source
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDzhavakhiya et al. (2012), Paul et al. (2011), and Da Silva Bomfim et al. (2015) suggested that combining natural compounds with other phenolic acids, essential oils, or conventional fungicides may improve their bioactivity and increase antifungal activity.
“Furthermore, Dzhavakhiya et al. (2012) [37], Paul et al. (2011) [38] and Da Silva Bomfim et al. (2015) [39] suggest that the combination of natural compounds with other phenolic acids, or with essential oils, or with conventional fungicides, may be a possible strategy to improve the bioactivity of these compounds, resulting in increased antifungal activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [37] Dzhavakhiya V, Shcherbakova L, Semina Y, Zhemchuzhina N, Campbell B (2012) Chemosensitization of plant Pathogenic fungi to agricultural fungicides. Front Microbiol 3:87 source
- cites [38] Paul S, Dubey RC, Maheswari DK, Kang SC (2011) Trachyspermum ammi (L.) fruit essential oil influencing on membrane permeability and surface characteristics in inhibiting food-borne pathogens. Food Control 22:725–731 source
- cites [39] Da Silva Bomfim N, Nakassugi LP, Pinheiro Oliveira JF, Kohiyama CY, GaleraniMossini SA, BotiãoNerilo RGS, Mallmann CA, Abreu Filho BA, Machinski M (2015) Antifungal activity and inhibition of fumonisin production by Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil in Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.). Food Chem 166:330–336 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe antifungal activity of ferulic acid was demonstrated by Funnell-Harris et al. (2014).
“and its antifungal activity was demonstrated by Funnell-Harris et al. (2014) [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Funnell-Harris DL, Sattler SE, Pedersen JF (2014) Response of Fusarium thapsinum to sorghum brown midrib lines and to phenolic metabolites. Plant Dis 98:1300–1308 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the conidial germination rate assay, Fusarium verticillioides CML 2743, Fusarium proliferatum CML 2825, Fusarium andiyazi CML 2703, and Aspergillus terreus BRM 32174 had higher germination percentages with sorghum phenolic extract than without it.
“In the presence of SPE, the species represented by F. verticillioides CML 2743 (B), F. proliferatum CML 2825 (C), F. andiyazi CML 2703 (D) and A. terreus BRM 32174 (G) showed higher percentages of germination when compared to samples without SPE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor synthetic antifungals, MIC values ranged from 0.50 to above 32 for amphotericin B, from 0.25 to above 128 for itraconazole, and from 8.0 to above 256 for fluconazole.
“For synthetic antifungals the MIC values of the samples varied between 0.50 and above 32 for amphotericin B, 0.25 and above 128 for itraconazole, 8.0 and above 256 for fluconazole (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the growth curve assay, Fusarium verticillioides CML 2743 with sorghum phenolic extract maintained its CFU count over 24 h, whereas control counts rose from 15,000 to 450,000 CFU/mL.
“F. verticillioides CML 2743 in medium with SPE kept the CFU.mL -1 over 24 h, while the control increased from 15,000 to 450,000 CFU.mL -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFusarium proliferatum CML 2825, Fusarium andiyazi CML 2793, Aspergillus sp. BRM 34978, and Penicillium pinophilum BRM 32157 showed growth curve behavior similar to Fusarium verticillioides CML 2743 in the presence of sorghum phenolic extract.
“F. proliferatum CML 2825, F. andiyazi CML 2793, Aspergillus sp.BRM 34978 and P. pinophilum BRM 32157 had similar behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFusarium verticillioides showed greater growth than the control in the preliminary assay, and some species showed higher germination rates in the presence than in the absence of sorghum phenolic extract in the conidia germination assay.
“This result also corroborates those obtained in the present work, in which F. verticillioides showed greater growth than the control, in the preliminary assay and in the conidia germination assay, in which some species showed higher germination rates in the presence than in the absence of SPE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SC319 sorghum phenolic extract did not inhibit the growth of the 16 fungal species tested in the minimum inhibitory concentration assay, nor the conidia germination rate of the 14 species tested.
“Likewise, the SC 319 SPE did not inhibit the growth of the 16 fungal species analyzed in the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) (assay 2) and the conidia germination rate (CGR) (assay 3) of those14 fungus species tested (from nº 1 to 14, Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the first 8 h of the growth curve assay, CFU counts decreased both with and without sorghum phenolic extract, and the control increased much more between 8 and 24 h.
“In the first 8 h, there was a reduction in the CFU.mL -1 , both in the absence and in the presence of SPE, and a much higher increase in the control samples between 8 and 24 h”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSolvents 1 to 9 gave similar extraction results and extracted phenolic compounds more efficiently than the other solvents.
“However, solvents 1 to 9 showed similar results and had better extraction efficiency of phenolic compounds than the others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Aspergillus terreus BRM 32174, Penicillium sp. BRM 35045, and Fusarium verticillioides BRM 35317, CFU with sorghum phenolic extract was greater than control after 8 h, but after 24 h the control showed higher growth.
“In the case of A. terreus BRM 32174, Penicillium sp.BRM 35045, and F. verticillioides BRM 35317, after eight h of growth, the CFU in the samples with SPE was more significant than in control.However, after 24 h, the growth curves were inverted, with the control samples showing much higher growth than those with SPE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sorghum phenolic extract from the SC319 genotype did not reduce the rate of mycelial growth (measured as colony diameter and dry weight) or the number of spores of Fusarium verticillioides CML 2743 in solid and liquid growth media (assay 1).
“There was no reduction in the mycelial growth rate (colony diameter and dry weight), as well as in the number of spores of Fusarium verticillioides (CML 2743) when applied phenolic sorghum extract (SPE) in the solid and liquid growth media (assay 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChemical pesticide use for managing plant pathogens has grown over recent decades.
“The use of chemical pesticides to control plant pathogens has intensified in the last decades [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Campos EV, Proença PL, Oliveira JL, Bakshi M, Abhilash PC, Fraceto LF (2019) Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: future perspectives. Ecol Ind 105:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.038 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPomegranate peel extract altered Penicillium digitatum hyphae, making them appear wilted and coiled.
“Kharchoufi et al. (2018) [11] studied the antifungal effect of pomegranate peel extract and verified, by optic microscopy, significant changes in the shape of Penicillium digitatum hyphae, which appeared wilted and coiled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Kharchoufi S, Licciardello F, Siracusa L, Muratore G, Hamdi M, Restuccia C (2018) Antimicrobial and antioxidant features of “Gabsi” pomegranate peel extracts. Ind Crops Prod 111:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.037 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSorghum grain phenolic content varies by genotype and can include phenolic acids, anthocyanins, and tannins concentrated in the pericarp.
“Depending on the genotype, its grains can be a rich source of various phenolic compounds, such as phenolic acids, anthocyanins, and tannins, which are concentrated in the pericarp [15].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Moraes EA, Marinelli RS, Lenquiste SA, Steel CJ, Menezes CB, Queiroz VAV, MarósticaJúnior MR (2015) Sorghum flour fractions: correlations among polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and glycemic index. Food Chem 180:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.023 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe 20% ethanol at room temperature method extracted phenolic compounds with a capacity similar to the conventional methanol method and with lower chemical residues and costs.
“Therefore, the solvent 20% ethanol at room temperature was selected and used in the present work due to generating lower chemical residues and lower costs than the conventional method (1% methanol HCl RT) and similar extraction capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe inhibitory effect of phenolic compounds on spore germination, mycelial growth, and microbial enzyme production varies among different phenol groups.
“Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of phenolic compounds in spore germination, mycelial growth, and the production/ activity of microbial enzymes vary among the different groups of phenols [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Nicholson RL, Hammerschmidt R (1992) Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:369–389 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataFusarium verticillioides may be more resistant to sorghum phenolic extract than Fusarium poae and Fusarium solani.
“In the present work, it was investigated the effect of SC 319 sorghum phenolic extract on F. verticillioides, which may be a more resistant species than F. poae and F. solani.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe growth curve assay was performed in triplicate.
“The experiment was performed in triplicate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe MIC broth microdilution method was performed according to the CLSI M60 document.
“Fungi susceptibility test to SPE: the broth microdilution method was used according to the M60 document proposed by CLSI [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2017) Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 1st edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI supplement M60
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSorghum phenolic extracts showed antioxidant and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Bacillus subtilis.
“Kil et al. (2009) [16] reported sorghum phenolic extracts' antioxidant and antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Bacillus subtilis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Kil HY, Seong ES, Ghimire BK, Chung I, Kwon SS, Goh EJ, Heo KH, Kim MJ, Lim JD, Lee D, Yu CY (2009) Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of crude sorghum extract. Food Chem 115(4):1234–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.032 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhenolic compounds have antioxidant, antiviral, antitumor, and antibacterial effects.
“Among these, phenolic compounds, secondary metabolites present in plants, have a range of biological effects, including antioxidant, antiviral, antitumor, and antibacterial effects [5,6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Haminiuk WIC, Maciel GM, Plata-Oviedo MSV, Peralta RM (2012) Phenolic compounds in fruits: an overviewm. Int J Food Sci Technol 47(10):2023–2044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03067.x source
- cites [6] Serrano J, Puupponen-Pimiã R, Dauer A, Aura AM, Saura-Calixto F (2009) Tanins: current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects. Mol Nutr Food Res 53:310–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200900039 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe finding that none of the sorghum cultivars showed antifungal activity corroborates the present work's findings.
“This result corroborates the findings of the present work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchöneberg et al. (2018) found that increasing concentrations of ferulic acid substantially inhibited the growth of Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium langsethiae, and Fusarium poae, while p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, quercetin, and rutin slightly stimulated mycelium growth.
“Recently, Schöneberg et al., (2018) [34] also observed that the increasing concentrations of ferulic acid substantially inhibited the growth of Fusarium graminearum (FG), F. langsethiae (FL) and F. poae (FP).In contrast, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, quercetin, and rutin slightly stimulated mycelium growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Schöneberg T, Kibler K, Sulyok M, Musa T, Bucheli DT, Mascher F, Bertossa M, Voegele RT, Vogelgsang S (2018) Can plant phenolic compounds reduce Fusarium growth and mycotoxin production in cereals? Food Addit Contam Part A 35(12):2455–2470. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1538570 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTannins have antimicrobial properties against many microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, and molds.
“Tannins, for example, have wellknown antimicrobial properties for many microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, and molds [8,9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Aguilera-Carbo C, Augur LA, Prado-Barragan E, Favela-Torres CN (2008) Aguilar microbial production of ellagic acid and biodegradation of ellagitannins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1276-2 source
- cites [9] Akhtar S, Ismail T, Fraternale D, Sestili P (2015) Pomegranate peel and peel extracts: chemistry and food features. Food Chem 174:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.035 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe conidial germination rate assay was performed in triplicate.
“the experiment was performed in triplicate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA reduction in colony-forming units may reduce the initial inoculum, which may in turn affect the onset and severity of diseases caused by these pathogens.
“This result is relevant because the reduction in CFUs may reduce the amount of initial inoculum, which may reflect the onset of infection and the severity of diseases caused by these pathogens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEach of the four MIC treatments was tested in duplicate.
“The experiment was performed in duplicate, for each of the four treatments (FLU, ITRA, AFNB, SPE)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAssay 1 was set up with random assignment, six replicates, and three treatments.
“The experimental design used was completely randomized, with six replications and three treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA methanol extract from pomegranate peel significantly inhibited spore germination and mycelial growth of Fusarium sambucinum.
“Elsherbiny et al. (2016) [10] observed that the methanol extract of pomegranate peel has a significant antifungal effect on the spore germination and mycelial growth of Fusarium sambucinum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Elsherbiny EA, Amin BH, Baka ZA (2016) Efficiency of pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) peels extract as a high potential natural tool towards Fusarium dry rot on potato tubers. Postharvest Biol Technol 111:256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.09.019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGordana et al. (2007) reported that antimicrobial activity in plant extracts depends on several secondary metabolites.
“According to Gordana et al. (2007) [35], the antimicrobial activity in plant extracts depends on several secondary metabolites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Gordana SC, Jasna MC, Sonja MD, Tumbas VT, Markov SL, Dragoljub DC (2007) Antioxidant potential, lipid peroxidation inhibition and antimicrobial activities of Satureja montana L. Subsp. kitaibelii extracts. Int J Mol Sci 8(10):1013–1027 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGauthier et al. (2016) reported that phenolic compounds from natural sources have valuable antifungal properties, but their effectiveness is often strain- and molecule-dependent.
“Gauthier et al. (2016) [36] report that phenolic compounds isolated from natural sources have valuable antifungal properties, but their effectiveness as an antifungal agent is often strain and molecule dependent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Gauthier L, Bonnin-Verdal MN, Marchegay G, Pinson-Gadais L, Ducos C, Richard-Forget F, Atanasova-Pénichon V (2016) Fungal biotransformation of chlorogenic and caffeic acids by Fusarium graminearum: new insights in the contribution of phenolic acids to resistance to deoxynivalenol accumulation in cereal. Int J Food Microbiol 221:61–68 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPaul et al. (2011) and Da Silva Bomfim et al. (2015) reported that essential oils combined with phenolic compounds can improve their bioavailability by increasing the permeability of phenolic compounds in mitochondria and the fungal plasma membrane.
“According to Paul et al. (2011) [38] and Da Silva Bomfim et al. (2015) [39] essential oils combined with phenolic compounds can improve their bioavailability, increasing the permeability of phenolic compounds in mitochondria and the fungal plasma membrane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Paul S, Dubey RC, Maheswari DK, Kang SC (2011) Trachyspermum ammi (L.) fruit essential oil influencing on membrane permeability and surface characteristics in inhibiting food-borne pathogens. Food Control 22:725–731 source
- cites [39] Da Silva Bomfim N, Nakassugi LP, Pinheiro Oliveira JF, Kohiyama CY, GaleraniMossini SA, BotiãoNerilo RGS, Mallmann CA, Abreu Filho BA, Machinski M (2015) Antifungal activity and inhibition of fumonisin production by Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil in Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.). Food Chem 166:330–336 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe SC319 genotype may have a low content of ferulic acid.
“this genotype may have a low content of ferulic acid”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAwika & Rooney (2004) suggested that the antimicrobial activity of sorghum may be due to tannins and other phenols acting synergistically.
“Awika & Rooney (2004) [12] suggest that the antimicrobial activity of sorghum may be due to the presence of tannins and other phenols that may synergistically contribute to its antimicrobial power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Awika JM, Rooney LW (2004) Sorghum phytochemical and their potential impact on human health. Phytochemistry 65:1199–1221 source
The paper relies on this without support.
No studies demonstrating the antifungal potential of sorghum phenolic extract were found in the literature.
“However, studies demonstrating its antifungal potential were not found in the literature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fusarium verticillioides is highly prevalent in maize and sorghum and is especially damaging to those crops.
“the fungus Fusarium verticillioides (strain CML 2743) was used because it is one of the most prevalent in maize and sorghum, and that causes more damage to these crops.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Few studies are available on the in vitro effect of these antioxidants on Fusarium species.
“There are a few studies available on the in vitro effect of these antioxidants on Fusarium species.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
MIC result covers isolates reported not to have grown
MajorThe methods say only 14 of the 16 MIC-assay isolates grew, yet the results assign an MIC above 5000 μg/mL to all 16. An isolate that did not grow cannot establish an MIC above the highest tested concentration.
“In MIC (assay 2), 16 isolates were used and only 14 showed growth, which were used in assay 3 (CGR).”
“After seven days of growth all SPE samples presented MIC above 5000 µg.mL -1 for the 16 fungi analyzed.”
Fusarium andiyazi isolate has conflicting identifiers
MinorThe germination results identify this isolate as CML 2703, whereas the isolate table and growth-curve results identify it as CML 2793.
“F. andiyazi CML 2703 (D)”
“| 4 | CML 2793 | Fusarium andiyazi |”
Significance claim uses the opposite p-value threshold
MinorThe results call the solvent differences significant at p > 0.05, but the statistical-analysis section defines significance as p < 0.05.
“There were significant differences (p > 0.05) in the phenolic compounds levels from sorghum extracted with different solvents”
“P-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.”
Abstract assigns the MIC result to the wrong assay
MinorThe abstract labels the MIC result as assay 1, while the methods identify MIC as assay 2 and reserve assay 1 for tests in solid and liquid media.
“All SPE samples presented MIC (assay 1) above the maximum concentration tested (5000 µg.mL -1 ) for the 16 isolates.”
“(2) Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), carried out with 16 different isolates of phytopathogenic fungi;”
Abstract assigns the MIC result to the wrong assay
MinorThe abstract calls the MIC test assay 1, whereas the methods label MIC as assay 2 and assay 1 as the solid- and liquid-medium test.
“All SPE samples presented MIC (assay 1) above the maximum concentration tested (5000 µg.mL -1 ) for the 16 isolates.”
“## Assay 2-Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)”
The stated solvent concentrations omit a concentration in the table
MinorThe methods list ethanol concentrations of 10%, 20%, and 30% for the solvent test, whereas Table 2 lists 50% ethanol treatments.
“ethanol (10, 20, and 30%) at RT and 40 °C, both with or without 3% citric acid, were used in the test (Table 2 of "Results and Discussion").”
“| 6 | Ethanol 50% RT | 19,02 | A |”
Cites
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1 · Cited by 19,125 · see citing works
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
Gressner, A. M., & Arndt, T. (2019) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48986-4_300416 · Cited by 5,092 · see citing works
J Antimicrob Chemother 1994; 33: 350–351
O’Shaughnessy, E. M., & DAS, S. S. (1994) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/33.2.350 · Cited by 3,746 · see citing works
Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Disease Resistance
Nicholson, R. L., & Hammerschmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002101 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
Sorghum phytochemicals and their potential impact on human health
Awika, J. M., & Rooney, L. W. (2004) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.001 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Tannins: Current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects
Serrano, J., Puupponen‐Pimiä, R., Dauer, A., Aura, A., & Saura‐Calixto, F. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900039 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Awika, J. M., Rooney, L. W., Wu, X., Prior, R. L., & Cisneros‐Zevallos, L. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf034790i · Cited by 803 · see citing works
Pomegranate peel and peel extracts: Chemistry and food features
Akhtar, S., Ismail, T., Fraternale, D., & Sestili, P. (2015) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.035 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Phenolic compounds in fruits – an overview
Haminiuk, C. W. I., Maciel, G. M., Plata‐Oviedo, M. S. V., & Peralta, R. M. (2012) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03067.x · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Biological properties of medicinal plants: a review of their antimicrobial activity
Silva, N., & Júnior, A. F. (2010) · The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · doi:10.1590/s1678-91992010000300006 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives
Campos, E. V. R., Proença, P. L. F., Oliveira, J. L., Bakshi, M., Abhilash, P. C., & Fraceto, L. F. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.038 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of crude sorghum extract
Kil, H. Y., Seong, E. S., Ghimire, B. K., Chung, I.-M., Kwon, S. S., Goh, E. J., Heo, K., Kim, M. J., Lim, J. D., Lee, D., et al. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.032 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Paul, S., Dubey, R. C., Maheswari, D. K., & Kang, S. C. (2011) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.11.003 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
da Silva Bomfim, N., Nakassugi, L. P., Faggion Pinheiro Oliveira, J., Kohiyama, C. Y., Mossini, S. A. G., Grespan, R., Nerilo, S. B., Mallmann, C. A., Alves Abreu Filho, B., & Machinski, M. (2015) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.019 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Antimicrobial and antioxidant features of ‘Gabsiʼ pomegranate peel extracts
Kharchoufi, S., Licciardello, F., Siracusa, L., Muratore, G., Hamdi, M., & Restuccia, C. (2018) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.037 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Moraes, É. A., Marineli, R. D. S., Lenquiste, S. A., Steel, C. J., Menezes, C. B. D., Queiroz, V. A. V., & Maróstica Júnior, M. R. (2015) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.023 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationGauthier, L., Bonnin-Verdal, M.-N., Marchegay, G., Pinson-Gadais, L., Ducos, C., Richard-Forget, F., & Atanasova-Penichon, V. (2016) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.005 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Microbial production of ellagic acid and biodegradation of ellagitannins
Aguilera-Carbo, A., Augur, C., Prado-Barragan, L. A., Favela-Torres, E., & Aguilar, C. N. (2008) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-007-1276-2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Santos, D. A., & Hamdan, J. S. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.4.1917-1920.2005 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Specific antifungal susceptibility profiles of opportunists in the Fusarium fujikuroi complex
Al‐Hatmi, A. M. S., van Diepeningen, A. D., Curfs-Breuker, I., de Hoog, S., & Meis, J. F. G. M. (2014) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dku505 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Ćetković, G. S., Čanadanović-Brunet, J. M., Djilas, S. M., Tumbas, V. T., Markov, S. L., & Cvetković, D. D. (2007) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/i8101013 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Elsherbiny, E. A., Amin, B. H., & Baka, Z. A. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.09.019 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Anunciação, P. C., Cardoso, L. D. M., Gomes, J. V. P., Della Lucia, C. M., Carvalho, C. W. P., Galdeano, M. C., Queiroz, V. A. V., Alfenas, R. D. C. G., Martino, H. S. D., & Pinheiro-Sant'Ana, H. M. (2017) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.065 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationScorzoni, L., Sangalli-Leite, F., de Lacorte Singulani, J., de Paula e Silva, A. C. A., Costa-Orlandi, C. B., Fusco-Almeida, A. M., & Mendes-Giannini, M. J. S. (2016) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2016.02.005 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Effect of the storage time and temperature on phenolic compounds of sorghum grain and flour
Oliveira, K. G. D., Queiroz, V. A. V., Carlos, L. D. A., Cardoso, L. D. M., Pinheiro-Sant’Ana, H. M., Anunciação, P. C., Menezes, C. B. D., Silva, E. C. D., & Barros, F. (2017) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.047 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, T., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Yu, L., Leng, W., Yang, J., Chen, L., Peng, J., Ma, L., Dong, J., et al. (2007) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-100 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Borman, A. M., Fraser, M., Palmer, M., Székely, A., Houldsworth, M., Patterson, Z., & Johnson, E. M. (2017) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof3020027 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Can plant phenolic compounds reduce<i>Fusarium</i>growth and mycotoxin production in cereals?
Schöneberg, T., Kibler, K., Sulyok, M., Musa, T., Bucheli, T. D., Mascher, F., Bertossa, M., Voegele, R. T., & Vogelgsang, S. (2018) · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · doi:10.1080/19440049.2018.1538570 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Chemosensitization of Plant Pathogenic Fungi to Agricultural Fungicides
Dzhavakhiya, V., Shcherbakova, L., Semina, Y., Zhemchuzhina, N., & Campbell, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00087 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Martinez, O. D. M., Theodoro, J. M. V., Grancieri, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103201 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationFunnell-Harris, D. L., Sattler, S. E., & Pedersen, J. F. (2014) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis-09-13-0980-re · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Funnell-Harris, D. L., O’Neill, P. M., Sattler, S. E., Gries, T., Berhow, M. A., & Pedersen, J. F. (2017) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/s10658-017-1148-2 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Silva, T. L., Lacerda, U. V., da Matta, S. L. P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.15301 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationSorghum Phytochemicals and Their Potential Impact on Human Health.
Awika, J. M., & Rooney, L. W. (2004) · ChemInform · doi:10.1002/chin.200438246 · Cited by 15
Antifungal activity of methanolic extracts of Sorghum halepense against Macrophomina phaseolina
Arshad Javaid (2012) · African Journal of Microbiology Research · doi:10.5897/ajmr12.1577 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
How to cope with the vulnerability of site specific fungicides on the control of Asian soybean rust
Zambolim, L., Juliatti, F. C., & Guerra, W. D. (2021) · International Journal of Research in Agronomy · doi:10.33545/2618060x.2021.v4.i1a.44 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ratnavathi, C., & Sashidhar, R. (2007) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2827 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Jabeen, K., Naeem, Z., Iqbal, S., & Saeed, M. K. (2021) · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH · doi:10.28941/pjwsr.v27i4.1008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Castellani A (1939) Viability of some pathogenic fungi in distilled water. J Trop Med Hyg 24:270–276
- AtaeiAzimi AA, DelnavazHashemloian B, Mansoorghanaei A (2007) Antifungal effects of water, alcoholic and phenolic extracts of seeds and leaves of Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench on Fusarium solani and F. poae. J Med Plants 6:26–32
- Authors
- da Conceição, R. R. P., Queiroz, V. A. V., Simeone, M. L. F., da Silva Araújo, D. D., do Carmo, P. H. F., de Menezes, C. B., Figueiredo, J. E. F., & de Resende Stoianoff, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
- Published
- 2024-05-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1829-1839
- ISSN
- 1517-8382 (ISSN-L)
- 1678-4405
- PMC
- PMC11153430
- OpenAlex
- W4396762465
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (SEG 20.18.03.006.00.00)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (APQ-00657-18)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (142352/2016-0)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Keywords
- antifungal activity, Fusarium verticillioides, minimum inhibitory concentration, conidial germination, fungal growth inhibition, plant pathogenic fungi, mycelial growth, plant disease control
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Fungi, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Phenols, Plant Extracts, Spores, Fungal, Sorghum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review