PHYTOCHMICAL ANALYSIS AND ANTIFUNGAL POTENTIAL OF SORGHUM HELEPENSE L. FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF OCHRATOXIGENIC FUNGI
Open accessAbstract
Ochratoxigenic fungal species are a major cause of various infections in plants and posed a serious threat to their consumers,including humans and animals. In the current study the objective was to examine the in vitro efficacy of different concentrations of leaves methanolic extract of S. helepense L. (Pers.) against target pathogenic ochratoxin producing fungal species (Trichoderma viride Pers., Trichoderma harzianum Rifai. and Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresen.) G.A. de Vries).For this purpose, different concentrations viz. 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% of leaf methanolic extract were prepared and tested for antifungal potential in a completely randomized design (CRD). Results revealed that all the applied concentrations of S. helepense inhibited the growth of all the tested fungal strain. Maximum growth inhibition was observed in 2% of concentration of methanolic extract of S. helepense in case of C. cladosporoides i.e. 84%. On the other hand minimum reduction was observed in 4% of concentration of methanolic extract of S. helepense against T. viride as compared to control. The phytochemical analysis was also conducted to evaluate that which chemical entities were present that account for antifungal potency of methanolic extract of S. helepense. Results of phytochemical analysis revealed the occurrence of saponins, alkaloids, coumarins, flavonoids and tannins while the plant is devoid of terpenoids, phlobatanins and glycosides respectively. Hence it can be concluded that the methanolic leaf extract of the tested plant proved to be beneficial for inhibiting the growth of test ochratoxigenic fungi.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Naeem et al. (2021) found that all tested concentrations of Sorghum halepense leaf extract inhibited the growth of all tested fungal strains.
“All the applied concentrations of S. halepense leaf extract inhibited the growth of all the tested fungal strains.”
From Does sorghum phenolic extract have antifungal effect? (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
In vitro Antimicrobial Activity and Phytochemical Analysis of Some Indian Medicinal Plants
Parekh, J., & Chanda, S. V. (2007) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Phytochemistry of Medicinal Plants
Kurmukov, A. G. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3912-7_4 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Mycotoxin: Its Impact on Gut Health and Microbiota
Liew, W.-P.-P., & Sabran, M. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2018.00060 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Aflatoxins in Food and Feed: An Overview on Prevalence, Detection and Control Strategies
Mahato, D. K., Lee, K. E., Kamle, M., Devi, S., Dewangan, K. N., Kumar, P., & Kang, S. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02266 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Fusarium-Produced Mycotoxins in Plant-Pathogen Interactions
Perincherry, L., Lalak-Kańczugowska, J., & Stępień, Ł. (2019) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins11110664 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Updating techniques on controlling mycotoxins - A review
Luo, Y., Liu, X., & Li, J. (2018) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.01.016 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of saponins extract of Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench
Oyekunle, M. A., Aiyelaagbe, O. O., & Fafunso, M. A. (2006) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY · doi:10.4314/ajb.v5i23.56024 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Mycotoxin Decontamination of Food: Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma versus “Classic” Decontamination
Hojnik, N., Cvelbar, U., Tavčar-Kalcher, G., Walsh, J. L., & Križaj, I. (2017) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins9050151 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Mycotoxins in Conversation With Bacteria and Fungi
Venkatesh, N., & Keller, N. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00403 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Current Status of Mycotoxin Contamination of Food Commodities in Zimbabwe
Nleya, N., Adetunji, M. C., & Mwanza, M. (2018) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins10050089 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Salazar‐López, N. J., González-Aguilar, G. A., Rouzaud‐Sández, O., et al. (2018) · Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1590/fst.16017 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Weeds and medicinal plants of Shawar valley, District Swat.
Islam, M. A., Ahmad, H., Rashid, A., et al. (2006) · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Management of Ascochyta rabiei by Chenopodium album Extracts
SHERAZI, A. Z., Jabeen, K., Iqbal, S., & Yousaf, Z. (2016) · Planta Daninha · doi:10.1590/s0100-83582016340400007 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF LEAF EXTRACT OF Cannabis sativa AGAINST Aspergillus flavipes
Khan, I. H., & Javaid, A. (2020) · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH · doi:10.28941/pjwsr.v26i4.883 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Antifungal activity of methanolic extracts of Sorghum halepense against Macrophomina phaseolina
Arshad Javaid (2012) · African Journal of Microbiology Research · doi:10.5897/ajmr12.1577 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Shah, M. A. R., Khan, R. A., & Ahmed, M. (2019) · Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.3329/bjp.v14i3.40292 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Khan, I. H., Javaid, A., & Naqvi, S. F. (2021) · International Journal of Phytopathology · doi:10.33687/phytopath.010.01.3506 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Elemental, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of a medicinal plant Sorghum halepense
Khayal, A. Y. (2019) · Pure and Applied Biology · doi:10.19045/bspab.2019.80022 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
USING EXTRACTS OF LAMB'S QUARTERS WEED FOR CONTROL OF Alternaria alternata
Javaid, S., Shah, M. H., Khan, I. H., et al. (2020) · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH · doi:10.28941/pjwsr.v26i2.824 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [2]2. Adebo, O.A and I.G. Meza. 2020. Impact of fermentation on the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of whole cereal grains: a mini review. Molecules, 25: 927.
- [3]3. Ademiluyi, A.O., G. Oboh, O.J. Agbebi, A. A. Boligon and M.L. Athayde. 2014. Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] leaf sheath dye protects against cisplatin-induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in rats. J. Med. Food, 17(12): 1332-1338.
- [4]4. Akande, I. S., A.A. Oseni and O.A. Biobaku. 2010. Effects of aqueous extract of Sorghum bicolor on hepatic, histological and haematological indices in rats. J. Cell Anim. Biol., 4(9): 137-142.
- [5]5. Balendres, M.A.O., P. Karlovsky and C.J.R. Cumagun. 2019. Mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxins in agricultural crop commodities in the Philippines: a review. Foods, 8(7): 249.
- [6]6. Celik, K. 2020. The efficacy of mycotoxin-detoxifying and biotransforming agents in animal nutrition. In: Nanomycotoxicology. Elsevier., pp. 271-284.
- [9]9. Ferdosi, M.F.H., I.H. Khan, A. Javaid, T. Sattar and A. Munir. 2021. Biochemical profile of Calotropis procera flowers. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 27(3): 341-349.
- [10]10. Haque, M.A., Y. Wang, Z. Shen, X. Li, M.K. Saleemi and C. He. 2020. Mycotoxin contamination and control strategy in human, domestic animal and poultry: A review. Microb. Pathog., 22: 104095.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does sorghum phenolic extract have antifungal effect?
da Conceição, R. R. P., Queiroz, V. A. V., Simeone, M. L. F., da Silva Araújo, D. D., do Carmo, P. H. F., de Menezes, C. B., Figueiredo, J. E. F., & de Resende Stoianoff, M. A. (2024) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s42770-024-01327-9
- Authors
- Jabeen, K., Naeem, Z., Iqbal, S., & Saeed, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Lahore College for Women University (PK)
- Pakistan Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (PK)
- Venue
- JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH
- Publisher
- Weed Science Society of Pakistan
- Published
- 2021-12-31
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 505-512
- ISSN
- 1815-1094 (ISSN-L)
- 2225-7942
- OpenAlex
- W4205781739
- Semantic Scholar
- 8555e12fbf70430faffcee7e790378d6000cfceb
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- antifungal activity, ochratoxigenic fungi, Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma harzianum, Cladosporium cladosporioides, methanolic leaf extract, phytochemical screening, saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, coumarins, plant-derived fungicides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
