Cited by 23Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Effect of Three Androgen Indexes (FAI, FT, and TT) on Clinical, Biochemical, and Fertility Outcomes in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Zhang, Duojia, Gao, Jingshu, Liu, Xuekui, Qin, Huichao, Wu, Xiaoke·2021·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

This work sought to evaluate the effects of three androgen indexes of free testosterone (FT), total testosterone (TT), and free-androgen index (FAI) on clinical phenotype, endocrine metabolic disorders, and fertility outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. The data in this study came from a large, multicenter, randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial involving 1000 infertile PCOS patients. Baseline phenotypic, endocrine, and metabolic parameters and fertility outcomes undergoing ovulation induction were collected. FAI is superior to FT, and FT is superior to TT in terms of their correlation with anthropometric parameters and metabolic profile. FT and TT were significantly positively correlated with LH/FSH. FAI and FT were significantly correlated with the incidence of metabolic syndrome. FAI, FT, and TT were significantly positively correlated with polycystic ovary morphology and menstrual period. FAI was significantly related ovulations per cycle, pregnancy, conception, and live birth rates. After adjusting for age, the increased FT level was significantly related to the decreased rates of ovulations per cycle, conception, and pregnancy. FAI is superior to FT and FT is superior to TT in terms of their correlation with phenotypic and metabolic parameters in PCOS patients. FAI and FT are important factors related to the fertility outcomes of infertile PCOS patients. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01573858.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43032-020-00316-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, D., Gao, J., Liu, X., Qin, H., & Wu, X.
Affiliations
  • Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Xuzhou Central Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Xiaoke
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2020-09-28
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
775-784
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W3090382707
Cited by
23
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The National Clinical Trial Base in Chinese Medicine Special Projects (2015B009)
  • National Public Welfare Projects for Chinese Medicine (201107005)
  • The Heilongjiang Natural Science Foundation Project (LH2019H116)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, free androgen index, free testosterone, total testosterone, androgen measurement, female infertility, ovulation induction, live birth rate, pregnancy rate, conception rate, metabolic syndrome, LH/FSH ratio, menstrual cycle
MeSH terms
Adult, Androgens, Birth Rate, China, Female, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Female, Menstrual Cycle, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Testosterone, Biomarkers, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy Rate, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review