Cited by 29Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial intelligence in K-12 education

Crompton, Helen, Burke, Diane·2022·SN Social Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43545-022-00425-5

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings of this systematic review align to Crompton et al.'s (2022) descriptive differences of the AI Assistant.

    “The findings of this systematic review align to Crompton et. al. 's (2022) descriptive differences of the AI Assistant.”

    From Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field (2023) · cites this paper as Crompton et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crompton, H., & Burke, D.
Affiliations
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Keuka College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Crompton, Helen
  • Burke, Diane
Venue
SN Social Sciences
Published
2022-07
Volume
2
Issue
7
ISSN
2662-9283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285498669
Cited by
29
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SN Social Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, K-12 education, AI affordances, student monitoring, group management, automated grading, data-driven decision making, AI tutors, personalized learning, group formation, group facilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review