Cited by 111Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI and HR TechnologiesLegal and Labor Studies

Is AI recruiting (un) ethical? A human rights perspective on the use of AI for hiring

Open access
Hunkenschroer, Anna Lena, Kriebitz, Alexander·2023·AI and Ethics

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in organizations' recruiting and selection procedures has become commonplace in business practice; accordingly, research on AI recruiting has increased substantially in recent years. But, though various articles have highlighted the potential opportunities and ethical risks of AI recruiting, the topic has not been normatively assessed yet. We aim to fill this gap by providing an ethical analysis of AI recruiting from a human rights perspective. In doing so, we elaborate on human rights' theoretical implications for corporate use of AI-driven hiring solutions. Therefore, we analyze whether AI hiring practices inherently conflict with the concepts of validity, autonomy, nondiscrimination, privacy, and transparency, which represent the main human rights relevant in this context. Concluding that these concepts are not at odds, we then use existing legal and ethical implications to determine organizations' responsibility to enforce and realize human rights standards in the context of AI recruiting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43681-022-00166-4

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [12]Latonero, M.: Governing artificial intelligence. Upholding human rights & dignity. Data & Society, pp. 1–37 (2018)
  2. [43]Van Otterlo M Hildebrandt M Vries KD A machine learning view on profiling Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn-Philosophers of Law Meet Philosophers of Technology 2013 Abingdon Routledge 41 64
  3. [44]Pasquale F The Black Box Society 2015 Cambridge Harvard University Press
  4. [58]Gal, U., Jensen, T.B., Stein, M.K.: People analytics in the age of big data: an agenda for is research. In: International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, South Korea (2017)
  5. [76]Van Den Hoven, J., Manders-Huits, N.: the person as risk, the person at risk. In: ETHICOMP: Living, Working And Learning Beyond Technology, Mantua, Italy, September 24–26, pp. 408–414. (2008)
  6. [84]Bîgu, D., Cernea, M.-V.: Algorithmic bias in current hiring practices: an ethical examination. In: 13th International Management Conference (IMC) on Management Strategies for High Performance. 13th International Management Conference (IMC) on Management Strategies for High Performance, Bucharest, Romania, October 31–November 1 (2019)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Kriebitz, A.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Hunkenschroer, Anna Lena
Venue
AI and Ethics
Published
2022-07-25
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
199-213
ISSN
  • 2730-5953 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-5961
OpenAlex
W4287218595
Cited by
111
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
FWCI
20.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI and Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
automated hiring, human rights, ethical analysis, validity, autonomy, non-discrimination, privacy, transparency, corporate social responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review