Cited by 307Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time

Hedge, A., Marsh, N.W.A.·1975·Acta Psychologica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(75)90041-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-12
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
427-439
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000790158
Cited by
306
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
Simon effect, spatial correspondence, spatial orientation, spatial data processing
MeSH terms
Color Perception, Humans, Information Theory, Male, Orientation, Reaction Time, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review