Cited by 210Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.

Tagliabue, Mariaelena, Zorzi, Marco, Umiltà, Carlo, Bassignani, Francesca·2000·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

In Experiment 1, children performed a Simon task after a spatially compatible or incompatible task. Results showed a Simon effect after the spatially compatible task and a reversed Simon effect after the spatially incompatible task. In Experiments 2-5, an identical procedure was adopted with adult participants, who performed the Simon task immediately after, a day after, or a week after the spatial compatibility task. Experiment 6 established a baseline for the Simon effect. Results showed a Simon effect after the spatially compatible task and no Simon effect or a reversed Simon effect after the spatially incompatible task. A modified version of the computational model of M. Zorzi and C. Umiltà (1995) was used to compare possible accounts of the findings. The best account exploits 2 types of short-term-memory links between stimulus and response and their interaction with long-term-memory links.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.648

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence from the two experiments suggests that processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility.

    “In sum, the evidence from these two experiments suggests that the processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility (e.g., DeJong et al., 1994;Tagliabue, Zorzi, Umilta, & Bassignani, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2000
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
648-670
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2050002472
Cited by
210
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
Simon effect, spatial compatibility, long-term memory, short-term memory, stimulus-response compatibility, memory interference, children, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review