Cited by 355Cognitive Abilities and TestingMemory Processes and InfluencesVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Interference with visual short-term memory

Logie, Robert H., Zucco, Gesualdo M., Baddeley, Alan D.·1990·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

Working memory (Baddeley and Hitch 1974) incorporates the notion of a visuo-spatial sketch pad; a mechanism thought to be specialized for short-term storage of visuo-spatial material. However, the nature and characteristics of this hypothesized mechanism are as yet unclear. Two experiments are reported which examined selective interference in short-term visual memory. Experiment 1 contrasted recognition memory span for visual matrix patterns with that for visually presented letter sequences. These two span tasks were combined with concurrent arithmetic or a concurrent task which involved manipulation of visuo-spatial material. Results suggested that although there was a small, significant disruption by concurrent arithmetic of span for the matrix patterns, there was a substantially larger disruption of the letter span task. The converse was true for the secondary visuo-spatial task. Experiment 2 combined the span tasks with two established tasks developed by Brooks (1967). Span for matrix patterns was disrupted by a visuo-spatial task but not by a secondary verbal task. The converse was true for letter span. These results suggest that the impairment in short-term visual memory resulting from secondary arithmetic reflects a small general processing load, but that the selective interference due to mode of processing is by far the stronger effect. Results are interpreted as being entirely consistent with the notion of a specialized visuo-spatial mechanism in working memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90066-o

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tapping out particular spatial patterns selectively affects visuospatial working memory skills, leading to impaired recall in that domain only.

    “In contrast, tapping out particular spatial patterns selectively affects visuospatial working memory skills, leading to impaired recall in that domain only (Logie, Zucco, & Baddeley, 1990).”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Logie, Zucco, & Baddeley, 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Logie, R. H., Zucco, G. M., & Baddeley, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Logie, Robert H.
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-10
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
55-74
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054721143
Cited by
355
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual short-term memory, visuospatial sketchpad, working memory, selective interference, processing load, visuospatial processing, matrix patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Serial Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review