Cited by 548Career Development and DiversityPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Dimensions underlying Holland's hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations?

Prediger, Dale J·1982·Journal of Vocational Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-8791(82)90036-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RIASEC interest domains are posited to reflect a hexagonal structure that represents the psychological similarity of the six domains.

    “The RIASEC interest domains are posited to reflect a hexagonal structure that represents the psychological similarity of the six domains (Holland, 1997;Prediger, 1982;Rounds & Tracey, 1993).”

    From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Prediger, 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prediger, D. J.
Affiliations
American College Testing (US)
Corresponding author
Prediger, Dale J
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-12
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
259-287
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989377401
Cited by
548
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
34.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
career interest, interest inventories, occupational tasks, career guidance, interest assessment, activity preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review