Cited by 61Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesSex and Gender in Healthcare

Understanding the Magnitude of Psychological Differences Between Women and Men Requires Seeing the Forest and the Trees

Open access
Eagly, Alice H., Revelle, William·2022·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Whether women and men are psychologically very similar or quite different is a contentious issue in psychological science. This article clarifies this issue by demonstrating that larger and smaller sex/gender differences can reflect differing ways of organizing the same data. For single psychological constructs, larger differences emerge from averaging multiple indicators that differ by sex/gender to produce scales of a construct’s overall typicality for women versus men. For example, averaging self-ratings on personality traits more typical of women or men yields much larger sex/gender differences on measures of the femininity and masculinity of personality. Sex/gender differences on such broad-gauge, thematic variables are large relative to differences on their component indicators. This increased effect magnitude for aggregated scales reflects gains in both their reliability and validity as indicators of sex/gender. In addition, in psychological domains such as vocational interests that are composed of many variables, at least some of which differ by sex/gender, the multivariate distance between women and men is typically larger than the differences on the component variables. These analyses encourage recognition of the interdependence of sex/gender similarity and difference in psychological data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17456916211046006

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several small sex differences in fundamental areas of psychological functioning may generate larger differences in everyday composite behaviors.

    “Although many of the psychological sex differences are minor, several small sex differences in fundamental areas of psychological functioning may generate larger differences in everyday composite behaviors (Eagly & Revelle, 2022).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Eagly & Revelle, 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Conn S. R. Rieke M. L. (Eds.). (1994). The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
  2. Del Giudice M. (in press). Measuring sex differences and similarities. In VanderLaan D. P. Wong W. I. (Eds.), Gender and sexuality development: Contemporary theory and research. Springer.
  3. Lord F. M. Novick M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.
  4. Mahalanobis P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India, 2(1), 49– 55.
  5. Spence J. T. Helmreich R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. University of Texas Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eagly, A. H., & Revelle, W.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Eagly, Alice H.
  • Revelle, William
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2022-05-09
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1339-1358
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W4229452583
Cited by
60
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
sex differences, gender differences, masculinity and femininity, personality traits, career interest, scale reliability and validity, men and women
MeSH terms
Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Personality, Reproducibility of Results, Masculinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review