Cited by 143Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and InequalityCareer Development and Diversity

Leadership efficacy and women leaders' responses to stereotype activation

Open access
Hoyt, Crystal L., Blascovich, Jim·2007·Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Abstract

The role of leadership efficacy in women's reactance responses to stereotype-based leadership role expectations was examined in two laboratory studies. Participants, selected on the basis of leadership efficacy scores, served as leaders of ostensible three-person groups. Half were primed with the gender leadership stereotype. An immersive virtual environment designed for this research served as the leadership setting. Results indicated that the effects of stereotype activation on women leaders were moderated by leadership efficacy such that high efficacy leaders exhibited more positive, reactance responses (increased perceived performance, increased rated performance, greater domain identification, and higher well-being) than low efficacy leaders. Additionally, perceived performance mediated the domain identification and well-being effects of stereotype activation on high and low efficacy leaders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1368430207084718

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Richmond (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Hoyt, Crystal L.
Venue
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2007-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
595-616
ISSN
  • 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7188
OpenAlex
W2158385869
Cited by
143
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0205740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
leadership effectiveness, women leaders, stereotype activation, reactance, perceived performance, domain identification, well-being, moderated effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review