Cited by 66Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Conversion of atrial flutter in pediatric patients by transesophageal atrial pacing: a safe, effective, minimally invasive procedure

Rhodes, Larry A., Walsh, Edward P., Saul, J.Philip·1995·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Atrial reentry tachycardia, often termed atrial flutter, is an arrhythmia that is uncommon in the general pediatric population but is seen frequently in patients with congenital heart disease. One goal in treating the arrhythmia is to terminate it, returning the atrium to its underlying rhythm. This report describes the use of transesophageal atrial pacing to attempt termination of atrial reentry in 102 pediatric patients (158 episodes). The patients ranged in age from 1 hour to 41.5 years. Conversion was successful for 112 (71%) of 158 episodes. Six of the 112 episodes required an infusion of procainamide after initial attempts at pacing led to atrial fibrillation. There were no significant differences between the ages of patients or the duration of the tachycardia in comparing successful versus unsuccessful conversions. In contrast, the atrial cycle lengths for the successfully converted tachycardias were significantly greater than for unsuccessful attempts. Transesophageal atrial pacing is a safe and effective means of terminating atrial flutter in the pediatric population. It is minimally invasive, it can often be performed in an outpatient setting, and the technique may occasionally be facilitated by infusion of intravenous procainamide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90448-4

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, L. A., Walsh, E. P., & Saul, J. P.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Saul, J.Philip
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
323-327
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078607240
Cited by
66
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08hl002380-02)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (KO8-HL02380-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial flutter, transesophageal atrial pacing, pediatric patients, procainamide, atrial fibrillation, congenital heart disease, minimally invasive procedures, outpatient procedure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Child, Child, Preschool, Heart Atria, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Procainamide, Tachycardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review