Cited by 31Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Termination of atrial reentrant tachycardias by using transesophageal atrial pacing

Brockmeier, Konrad, Ulmer, Herbert E., Hessling, Gabriele·2002·Journal of Electrocardiology

Abstract

Atrial reentrant tachycardia (ART) is not an uncommon complication in patients after surgery for congenital heart defects, particularly after extensive atrial procedures with sutures lines or baffeling maneuvers. Primary atrial flutter is a rare dysrhythmia in newborns. Two issues of ART or atrial flutter can be addressed by the esophageal approach: First, ART (often with 2:1 A-V conduction) may be difficult to detect on the surface ECG as the P waves usually do not show the typical flutter morphology or are hidden in the T wave. Recordings over the esophageal lead clearly determine the underlying rhythm. Second, termination of ART by pacing the atria can easily be performed by using an esophageal electrode. We performed 62 conversions of ART in 39 pts. (median age 12.5 years), among them 7 newborns with typical atrial flutter. The pacing algorithm started with 4 extrastimuli and pacing intervals 20 msec shorter than the atrial cycle length of tachycardia. Conversion was achieved in 50/62 (81%) cases; in 12 of 62 (19%) cases conversion was performed externally as the transesophageal approach was insufficient to restore sinus rhythm. Intravenous infusion of amiodarone prior to atrial pacing seems to be helpful in some patients for termination of ART. We recommend transesophageal atrial pacing as a first step of acute management of atrial flutter and other forms of ART in neonates, infants, and children because it is a minimal invasive procedure with high success rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1054/jelc.2002.37174

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brockmeier, K., Ulmer, H. E., & Hessling, G.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Electrocardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
159-163
ISSN
0022-0736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150016459
Cited by
31
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Electrocardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
transesophageal atrial pacing, atrial flutter, congenital heart disease, esophageal leads, pacing algorithms, amiodarone, neonates, infants, children, tachycardia termination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Atrial Flutter, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Child, Child, Preschool, Electrocardiography, Esophagus, Heart Atria, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Postoperative Complications, Tachycardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review