The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative plans for complex group action
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986) · doi:10.5555/12457.12458 · Cited by 2,580
Self-citationIntention, Plans, and Practical Reason.
Velleman, J. D., & Bratman, M. E. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185304 · Cited by 2,384
Shoham, Y. (1993) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(93)90034-9 · Cited by 2,041
Intention is choice with commitment
Cohen, P. R., & Levesque, H. J. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90055-5 · Cited by 1,860
Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (1995) · Cited by 1,753
Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business
Pratt, J. W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1990) · Cited by 1,274
Bratman, M. E. (1992) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185537 · Cited by 1,244
Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving
Davis, R., & Smith, R. G. (1983) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(83)90015-2 · Cited by 1,230
Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning
Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J., & Pollack, M. E. (1988) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00284.x · Cited by 1,136
Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -
(1986) · doi:10.3115/981131 · Cited by 1,081
Cited by
A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms
HORLING, B., & LESSER, V. (2004) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888905000317 · Cited by 709
Explorations in engagement for humans and robots
Sidner, C. L., Lee, C., Kidd, C. D., Lesh, N., & Rich, C. (2005) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.005 · Cited by 558
Narrative Planning: Balancing Plot and Character
Riedl, M. O., & Young, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2989 · Cited by 522
Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments
Kraus, S. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00025-8 · Cited by 451
Self-citationAutonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems
Albrecht, S. V., & Stone, P. (2018) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.01.002 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-357
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146544759
- Cited by
- 954
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative plans for complex group action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00103-4
- The paper
- Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1996). Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00103-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
