The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in thought suppression. The White Bear Suppression Inventory: Factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates
Abstract
The White Bear Suppression Inventory [WBSI; Wegner, D.M. & Zanakos, S. (1994), Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640] is a self-report questionnaire measuring people's general tendency to suppress unwanted negative thoughts. The current article describes two studies investigating the reliability, factor structure, validity, and correlates of the WBSI. Study 1 (n = 172) showed that the WBSI is a reliable instrument in terms of internal consistency and test-retest stability. Factor analyses of the WBSI revealed a 1-factor solution. Furthermore, the WBSI was found to correlate positively with measures of emotional vulnerability and psychopathological symptoms. In Study 2 (n = 40), the relationship between WBSI and levels of intrusive thinking was examined in more detail, using a thought suppression task. In general, results of this thought suppression experiment provided evidence for the validity of the WBSI. That is, subjects with high WBSI scores exhibited higher frequencies of unwanted intrusive thoughts than subjects with low WBSI scores.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies show that the WBSI is a reliable and valid self-report instrument [37].”
From CareACT - internet-based intervention for enhancing the psychological well-being of elderly caregivers - a study protocol of a controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“The measure has good reliability and validity (Muris, Merckelbach, & Horselenberg, 1996).”
From Supported Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Older Family Caregivers (CareACT) Compared to Usual Care. (2022) · cites this paper as Muris, Merckelbach, & Horselenberg, 1996
Citations
Cites
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
A revised version of the Psychoticism scale
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 · Cited by 3,094
Spielberger, C. D. (2010) · The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0943 · Cited by 2,535
Paradoxical effects of thought suppression.
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.5 · Cited by 2,127
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
Fischer, H. (1980) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(80)73639-3 · Cited by 1,612
Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x · Cited by 1,245
Obsessional-compulsive complaints
HODGSON, R. J., & Rachman, S. (1977) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(77)90042-0 · Cited by 1,238
Abnormal and normal obsessions
Rachman, S., & de Silva, P. (1978) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(78)90022-0 · Cited by 1,160
(1992) · Cited by 1,154
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Muris, 1991, Het effect van gedachte-onderdrukking: een quasi-experiment (The effect of thought suppression: a quasi-experiment), Directieve Therapie, 11, 119
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-Compassion
NEFF, K. D. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309027 · Cited by 6,436
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101 · Cited by 2,309
Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8 · Cited by 1,630
Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning.
Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S. (2007) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004 · Cited by 1,627
Bjureberg, J., Ljótsson, B., Tull, M. T., Hedman, E., Sahlin, H., Lundh, L.-G., Bjärehed, J., DiLillo, D., Messman-Moore, T., Gumpert, C. H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x · Cited by 1,081
“80; Muris, Merckelbach, & Horselenberg, 1996) and construct validity (Muris et al., 1996; Schmidt et al., 2009; Wegner & Zanakos, 1994) of this measure.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., & Horselenberg, R.
- Corresponding author
- Muris, Peter
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 501-513
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003939947
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- thought suppression, White Bear Suppression Inventory, intrusive thoughts, individual differences, emotional vulnerability, psychiatric symptoms, factor structure, reliability statistics, validity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Individuality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Repression, Psychology, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
