Cited by 925Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Utility of in vitro drug metabolism data in predicting in vivo metabolic clearance

Brian Houston, J.·1994·Biochemical Pharmacology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90520-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brian Houston, J.
Venue
Biochemical Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-04
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1469-1479
ISSN
0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064799851
Cited by
925
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 42
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
tubulin polymerization inhibitors, in vitro metabolism, G2/M cell cycle arrest, mitotic arrest, lymphoma, liver microsomal stability, anticancer agents
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotransformation, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Microsomes, Liver, Pharmacokinetics, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review