Gaur (Bos gaurus) and development in Malaysia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A yearling female B. gaurus in Malaysia ranged over 52 km2 (October 1977-December 1978).
“Another telemetry study from Malaysia of 3 B. gaurus found a yearling male that ranged over 30 km 2 (November 1978-May 1979), a yearling female that ranged over 52 km 2 (October 1977-December 1978), and an adult male (about 5 years old) that ranged over 137 km 2 (January-November 1978; Conry 1989).”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Conry 1989
These 3 B. gaurus individuals frequently used areas adjacent to human settlements, and all their ranges included at least 1 salt lick.
“These 3 B. gaurus individuals also frequently used areas adjacent to human settlements, and all their ranges included at least 1 salt lick.”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Conry 1989
An adult male B. gaurus (about 5 years old) in Malaysia ranged over 137 km2 (January-November 1978).
“Another telemetry study from Malaysia of 3 B. gaurus found a yearling male that ranged over 30 km 2 (November 1978-May 1979), a yearling female that ranged over 52 km 2 (October 1977-December 1978), and an adult male (about 5 years old) that ranged over 137 km 2 (January-November 1978; Conry 1989).”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Conry 1989
A yearling male B. gaurus in Malaysia ranged over 30 km2 (November 1978-May 1979).
“Another telemetry study from Malaysia of 3 B. gaurus found a yearling male that ranged over 30 km 2 (November 1978-May 1979), a yearling female that ranged over 52 km 2 (October 1977-December 1978), and an adult male (about 5 years old) that ranged over 137 km 2 (January-November 1978; Conry 1989).”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Conry 1989
The 3 B. gaurus monitored in Malaysia primarily used disturbed and early seral habitats created by logging and agricultural development, secondary forest, and agricultural estates.
“Despite the availability of primary forest within 1.5 km of their home ranges, these 3 B. gaurus that were monitored in Malaysia primarily used disturbed and early seral habitats created by logging and agricultural development, secondary forest, and agricultural estates.”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Conry 1989
Areas within 500 m of agricultural fields, areas within 500 m of major rivers, and areas below 61 m elevation were used disproportionately with respect to their availability in the ranges of these 3 B. gaurus individuals.
“Furthermore, areas within 500 m of agricultural fields, areas within 500 m of major rivers, and areas below 61 m elevation were used disproportionately with respect to their availability in the ranges of these individuals.”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Conry 1989
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Conry, P. J.
- Corresponding author
- Conry, Paul J.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-65
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990132412
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- Bos gaurus, home range, habitat use, habitat fragmentation, logging impacts, agricultural development, human disturbance, road avoidance, mineral licks, poaching, ecological corridors, wildlife reserves, Pahang
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review