The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Golgi study of neuronal types in the neostriatum of monkeys
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161
Cytoarchitecture of the central amygdaloid nucleus of the rat
McDonald, A. J. (1982) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902080409 · Cited by 338
Medium spiny neuron projection from the rat striatum: An intracellular horseradish peroxidase study
Preston, R. J., Bishop, G. A., & Kitai, S. T. (1980) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(80)90462-x · Cited by 320
Afferent and Efferent Relationships of the Basal Ganglia
Nauta, W. J. H., & Domesick, V. B. (1984) · Novartis Foundation Symposia · doi:10.1002/9780470720882.ch2 · Cited by 272
Atrophy of medium spiny I striatal dendrites in advanced Parkinson's disease
McNeill, T. H., Brown, S. A., Rafols, J. A., & Shoulson, I. (1988) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(88)90124-2 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- DiFiglia, M., Pasik, P., & Pasik, T.
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-09
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-256
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988041026
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Golgi study of neuronal types in the neostriatum of monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0006-8993(76)90669-7
- The paper
- DiFiglia, M., Pasik, P., & Pasik, T. (1976). A Golgi study of neuronal types in the neostriatum of monkeys. Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(76)90669-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
