Cited by 272Neurological disorders and treatmentsMotor Control and AdaptationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Afferent and Efferent Relationships of the Basal Ganglia

Nauta, W. J. H., Domesick, V. B.·1984·Novartis Foundation Symposia

Abstract

A survey of the known circuitry of the basal ganglia leads to the following conclusions. (1) No complete account can yet be given of the neural pathways by which the basal ganglia affect the bulbospinal motor apparatus. Channels of exit from the basal ganglia originate from the internal pallidal segment, the pars reticulata of the substantia nigra, and the subthalamic nucleus, and each of these is directed in part rostrally to the cerebral cortex by way of the thalamus, in part caudally to the midbrain. The postsynaptic extension of the mesencephalic channels to bulbar and spinal motor neurons is largely unknown. Since the ascending channels are collectively of greatest volume, the notion remains plausible that the basal ganglia act in considerable part by modulating motor mechanisms of the cortex. (2) Recent findings in the rat suggest that the striatum is subdivided into a ventromedial, limbic system-afferented region and a dorsolateral, 'non-limbic' region largely corresponding to the main distribution of corticostriatal fibres from the motor cortex. These two subdivisions appear to give rise to different striatofugal lines, the outflow from the limbic-afferented sector partly re-entering the circuitry of the limbic system. (3) The limbic-afferented striatal sector suggests itself as an interface between the motivational and the more strictly motor aspects of movement. This suggestion is strengthened by evidence that the 'limbic striatum' seems enabled by its striatonigral…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470720882.ch2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LCSPT circuits initially were related to emotional behavior on the basis of their anatomical connectivity with visceral control structures that mediate emotional expression, such as the hypothalamus and periaqueductal gray (PAG).

    “The LCSPT circuits initially were related to emotional behavior on the basis of their anatomical connectivity with visceral control structures that mediate emotional expression, such as the hypothalamus and periaqueductal gray (PAG) (Nauta and Domesick 1984).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nauta, W. J. H., & Domesick, V. B.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Venue
Novartis Foundation Symposia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-01
Volume
107
Pages
3-29
ISSN
  • 1528-2511 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-4657
OpenAlex
W1502549816
Cited by
272
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Novartis Foundation symposium (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
basal ganglia, basal ganglia circuitry, striatum, internal pallidum, substantia nigra pars reticulata, subthalamic nucleus, thalamus, motor cortex, limbic striatum, dopamine innervation
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Basal Ganglia, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Extrapyramidal Tracts, Globus Pallidus, Humans, Limbic System, Nucleus Accumbens, Substantia Nigra, Thalamic Nuclei, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review