Cited by 198Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Activity of neurones in the inferotemporal cortex of the alert monkey

Rolls, E.T., Judge, S.J., Sanghera, Manjit K.·1977·Brain Research

Abstract

The activity of neurones in the inferotemporal cortex of the alert rhesus monkey was recorded while the monkey was shown visual stimuli, which included both food and non-food objects for comparison with the activity of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata. In the anteroventral part of the inferotemporal cortex, neurones were found with visual responses which were sustained while the animal looked at the appropriate visual stimuli. The latency of the responses was 100 msec or more. The majority (96/142 or 68%) of these neurones responded more strongly to some stimuli than to others. These units usually had different responses when objects were shown from different views, and physical factors such as shape, size, orientation, colour and texture appeared to account for the responses of some of these units. Association of visual stimuli with a food reward (glucose solution) or an aversive taste (5% saline solution) did not affect the magnitude of the responses of the neurones to the stimuli either during the learning or after the period of learning. Nor did feeding the monkey to satiety affect the responses of the neurones to their effective stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90272-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inferior temporal cortex represents objects and faces independently of their reward value.

    “the inferior temporal cortex represents objects and faces independently of their reward value as shown by visual discrimination reversal and devaluation of reward tests by feeding to satiety (Rolls et al., 1977; Rolls, 2012a, 2016b, 2019c).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Rolls et al., 1977

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolls, E. T., Judge, S. J., & Sanghera, M. K.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-07
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
229-238
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138203285
Cited by
198
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
inferotemporal cortex, rhesus monkeys, single-unit activity, visual object recognition, viewpoint invariance, food reward, aversive taste, lateral hypothalamus, substantia innominata, satiety
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Cerebral Cortex, Learning, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Reaction Time, Satiation, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review