Cited by 312Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The latency of activation of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata during feeding in the monkey

Rolls, E.T., Sanghera, M.K., Roper-Hall, A.·1979·Brain Research

Abstract

To investigate whether the responses of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata associated with the sight of food could control the responses of the hungry monkey to the food, the latency of activation of these neurones by food was measured. It was found that when an electromagnetically operated wide-aperture shutter opened to reveal food or non-food objects, these hypothalamic neurones responded with a latency of 150--200 msec to the food objects, and did not respond to the non-food objects. To measure the latency of the monkey's responses to the food, a visual discrimination task was set in which the monkey could lick a tube to obtain fruit juice if a food-realted visual stimulus was shown, but obtained hypertonic saline, which was aversive, if a different visual stimulus was shown. In this situation the typical latencies of the neuronal responses to the food were 150--200 msec, of the lick responses 350--500 msec, and of the EMG activity associated with these lick responses 250--400 msec. Thus the responses of these hypothalamic neurones precede the monkey's responses to the food, and could mediate the feeding and other responses of the animal to the food. It was also shown that a different population of hypothalamic neurones with responses associated with the sight of aversive visual stimuli had response latencies of 150--200 msec.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90010-6

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rolls, 1976, Neurophysiology of feeding, Life Sci., 2, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Rolls, E. T., Sanghera, M. K., & Roper-Hall, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rolls, E.T.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-03
Volume
164
Issue
1-2
Pages
121-135
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156766402
Cited by
312
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
lateral hypothalamus, substantia innominata, feeding behavior, hunger, aversive stimuli, visual discrimination
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Arousal, Avoidance Learning, Discrimination Learning, Drinking, Eating, Electromyography, Hunger, Hypothalamus, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Reaction Time, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review